G-Spot “Doesn’t Exist”

momo_velia_deviluke-nana_asta_deviluke-to-love-ru-by-ishikei.jpg

Sex researchers have concluded that the so-called G-Spot, a vaginal area of exceedingly heightened sexual sensitivity, does not in fact exist.

The Gräfenberg Spot, named for the gynecologist who postulated its existence, is said to be an especially erogenous area of the vagina which can produce powerful orgasms when stimulated during sex.

For decades, sexual literature detailing how to stimulate it has flourished in the pages of women’s magazines, but its existence has never been scientifically demonstrated.

Seeking to put the matter to rest, University of London researchers undertook the largest sexological study of the G-Spot to date, encompassing 1,800 women.

The study participants, all twins, were asked whether they considered themselves to have a G-Spot or not, on the basis that if the G-Spot did exist as a biological and genetic phenomenon, it would be more likely to occur in identical twins (who share the same genes) than in non-identical twins (who share only half their genes).

The results demonstrated identical twins were no more likely than non-identical twins to report having such a spot, suggesting the G-Spot is in fact a purely subjective phenomenon at best.

One of the authors holds forth on the subject:

“Women may argue that having a G-spot is due to diet or exercise, but in fact it is virtually impossible to find real traits.

This is by far the biggest study ever carried out and shows fairly conclusively that the idea of a G-spot is subjective.”

Via the BBC.



    Post Comment »
    224 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by msoltyspl
    17:23 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uhh, "were asked" ? So they asked 1800 people about highly personal thing - and on top of that in highly retarded world we live in, where adults blush like 5 year old kids when talking about anything related to sex. And ... they draw conclusions from that ?

    Do some scientific TESTS for cyring out loud, or don't bother at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:45 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    agreed. how does this 'scientifically' prove anything? its all opinion. the participants were asked if the 'think' they have a g-spot, and base their findings on these opinions. what kind of fucked up science do they have in london?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:32 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Good point. This is like a survey more than anything. It's like asking someone, 'Are you ticklish?'. 'No.'

    And when they say 'no', that's it? I'd tickle the bastard in any which way I can!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:12 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mine certainly exists. I don't think it's mental, because even when I'm not in the mood that spot getting touched drives me absolutely crazy with pleasure.

    But really guys, all you need to do is rub the clitoris tip gently during pumping. That will drive a girl nuts usually, guaranteed.

    And try foreplay!

    Comment by RopeXPantsu
    22:23 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Biggest twincest orgy ever. Also, where the hell did they find so many twins?

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:44 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It has already been said a billion times that americans aren't "stupid", end of story.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:34 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    After reading this article twice from two different sources I still can't tell why they have to use twins. What the hell is the significance?

    Also, there is a g spot. I know I discovered mine before I read some shitty women's rag.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:13 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    All of you are complete idiots.

    "I CAN PROVE IT WATCH JUST FUND ME."

    or

    "I CAN FIND IT ON MY GF GOD WHAT STUPID SCIENTISTS."

    Awesome. Go do it. Go ask 10,000 women on a clinical study, "May I examine your vagina for a research study to prove that the G-spot exists?"

    I doubt you'll reach the 10,000 mark in due time. It's also possible the woman might say, "Why don't you just ask me if I have one?" To which you might respond, "Well, do you?"

    "I don't," she says curtly.

    God. Idiots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:10 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What about guys' g-spot? The prostate gland in our anus. Who wanna volunteer and take one for the team?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What I'm reading here is that their findings are that no particular G-spot exists, and one does not HAVE to exist in all women, that being said, their findings do not seem to conclude that "no women" anywhere have what is considered a G-spot.

    They said the identical twins were no more likely to report such a spot than regular twins. This means that some women DID report having such a spot, as their was a likelihood that existed, and it was never specified as zero (which would conclude there is no such thing).

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:41 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    TexasDude:

    What? This is NOT science... this is more of a lame study by guy(s) who DON'T know to pleasure a woman.... if ever had sex with human woman.

    Yeah, the G-Spot does exist. But its a matter of where and how its used and it varies from woman to woman. Just like different women like their clit treated differently than others. Or guys have different shaped penises and want them touched or stroked differently.

    Recently had sex with 2 women who came all over the place. One said her recently separated husband didn't make her cum like that. She was very messy in a good way :)

    For her, it was hitting that G-spot hard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:52 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so they asked 1,800 women if they thought they had a g-spot? that's a fucking survey and a stupid one at that. i would think that a study about the g-spot would include attempted stimulation of said area, not asking a yes or no question. this "study" has more to do with headline grabbing than actual scientific research, and therefore fails on every level.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:31 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I smell Bullshit

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:24 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    G-Spot have concluded that the so-called Sex researchers , a certain fake scientists- a former parasite of society , does not in fact exist.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:48 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Heh, it doesn't really matter if a G-spot exists or not..

    I bring women pleasure regardless.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:58 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It does exist.
    Just because scientists are too busy in labs instead of getting laid and finding it themselves doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
    "I haven't seen it, so it doesn't exist."
    Yeah, of course, and the air we breathe doesn't exist because we can't (normally) see it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:44 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the ppl who think they have one are just extremely and constantly horny.

    Comment by Rem
    16:25 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Trust a Brit to miss the G-Spot 1800 times.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    16:12 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    haha it's there...ya just gotta believe! :O

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:38 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hahaha awesome. New look at all the times a woman blames a man for not being able to find it.

    Comment by atomicparfait
    15:05 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Didn't read the article, did like the Ishikei pic.

    Comment by Shuu
    15:04 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Next they'll proclaim that female ejaculation is merely an optical illusion.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:29 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Forget the G-spot men and sadly many women need to learn how to use the clitoris.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:26 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I LOVE the idea of getting 1800 twins and conducting an "experiment" sounds like a mass orgy to me.

    Comment by Polarbear925
    16:53 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It can be safely assumed that the headline pretty much translates to "Scientists can't find G-Spot". Gee, maybe someone should tell Dr. Grafenberg, perhaps?

    Comment by Kelvin
    20:48 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Men have G-spots too. It's located right...under your feet...-.-

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:33 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You saw that! Go Wiskypedia, they have the truth.

    ... and Girl's g spot is in her neck or somewhere else inside the body. (?)

    Please don't try to research about the 2nd possibility.
    Kyo Haru

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:38 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Every women are different no matter what...Some women its easy to find it some not...simple

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:39 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So, theres no female g spot but there is male g spot! ; O

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:44 08/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats sad. So much for that "gee it feels good feeling"

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:44 12/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    MY EYES

    Could you who don't understand the original article, or the quote above from the author, stop bothering the rest of SanCon with your useless opinions?

    This is a peer reviewed article in a scientific journal. It has been reviewed by other scientists and if it was bad science it wouldn't even have been published.

    YOU are not better than scientists on the subject just because you have a girlfriend and confidence that you're right.

    As for why they're using twins for the study, RTFA RTFA RTFA.

    This does NOT mean that women can't ejoy sex, or that women can't have orgasms. It just means that the g-spot probably doesn't exist a physical part of the female body.

    Comment by Naeuigeudae
    19:19 27/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The G Spot does exist. Maybe if they gave up this useless research and got some ass instead..

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:24 12/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats weird because according to internet pictures and sites its there, and tons of women and men who use it. Its a spongy bump about 2inches in and the size of a dime. Theres even and collagen injection to enlarge it to increase pleasure in women. See:

    http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=69725

    One study doesnt debunk every proof of existence. Especially in the most up tight country ever.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:54 03/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The "doctor" just fingered 1800 women.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:30 17/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Know what else doesn't exist? Chivalry.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:01 25/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Huh? Wrong.

    I'm female. While I have not been able to feel anything from it, I feel that rough patch of skin.

    Comment by Plagus777
    16:47 25/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you're telling me this was discovered before electricity? I guess scientists aren't into things like this...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:31 24/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who draw the pic?

    Comment by tyciol
    03:07 15/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think it's probably more of an 'area' (as in, the wall the clitoris is on the other side of) than a 'spot'.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:12 25/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    if the g-spot was there, they would find it when they cut open dead women. They don’t. It DOES however touch the inner clit so, seriously, is that any shock it feels different? Touch a man on his shift, then the frenulum or the glans (head) itself and it feels different. Very different. But it's the same organ.

    Most women I know and have been with can’t find their own g-spot so how are men supposed to do it? Slip a finger in a few inches and make the come hither motion? Buy the bent toy that is supposed to stimulate it? Please. I've done all that all usually the general response are... that feels sorta good... to… stop that it makes me want to pee.

    It’s a part of the bundle of nerves that is the clitoris, just a different part of it. So yes, it feels different to the woman. But different is not always good.

    If an autopsy can some day pull out this magic spot as an organ and show it to the world, end of debate. Till then, I call bullshit on it being a real, separate thing.

    Comment by Lonesnipa
    19:09 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well the recession exists because the US banking system had almost all of its rules taken out so basically people were borrowing money that didn't exist. Sorta like a pyramid scheme, only the world loses.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:11 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is bullshit their study was nothing but asking women, thats not a study thats a fucking poll

    Comment by R3TAK
    23:29 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well im sure they'll find it some day they probally just need to look a bit harder.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:37 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So they concluded this after... asking some women? That sounds very scientific, really.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:03 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    but the male g-spot does exist :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    this study is does not extend to the entire human population because brits are frigid.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:50 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so... all the study did was ASK the women if they think they have no G-spot?

    that's odd. . . doesn't sound all that accurate to me

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:44 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uu~ Uu~ G-Spots 'exist'!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    00:54 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's a spot, or rather a way to mechanically stimulate a lady to orgasm, want it or not. Let's define, I don't know about an "Instant On" but the "G-Spot" was never supposed to be that. However, when she's being stimulated otherwise, yeah, there's an area -likely a nerve cluster or maybe a gland- that can be pushed to trigger things.

    In the "Sex Industry" it's called the "WhoreGasm" where the lady who's usually thinking about getting her nails done again while being pumped suddenly has a super powerful orgasm 'cause the stunt cock pumping her twists a bit to give the camera a better angle or the licker sticks deep enough. And, as long as she's fairly good at the "Oh yes oh yes..." act they don't really try to do it to her, since that sort of thing is what can cause a lot of them to 'quit' the biz.

    I can think of a way to "Test" it that'd make an incredible porn movie, but it'd be ethically unacceptable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:45 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well i probably wouldnt care much about this... i'll just have sex and usual and just think that the g-spot exists, and it would be alright

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here's a link:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/feb/21/medicalresearch.sciencenews

    Ultrasound shows actual anatomical differences between women who can have vaginal orgasms and those who cannot.

    Science wins.

    Comment by Ryoma_Saegami
    17:36 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    bahahahahahaha!!! i personally claim this shit false.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:17 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This so called study is an utter farce. The participants were asked if they had a g-spot, and that's it; no actual examination of any sort. So fellow fans, do not be disheartened.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:35 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And the twiiiiiiins!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:18 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's still the second spot, the "Deep Spot" or AFE Zone - Anterior Fornix Erogeneous Zone, which is purportedly located near the base of the cervix on the anterior wall of the vagina. Women have reported to achieving intense orgasm, much more profound than stimulation of other regions, through stimulation of this region.

    As well there's rumors of a third spot which is said to be in the cervical cavity. Stimulation of this area has resulted in orgasm for some women, however, most report pain and pressure on the likes of being hit in the stomach.

    These spots must be extensively tested in order to determine validity.

    Everyone! Onwards for science!!!

    Comment by Juuza Sama
    04:29 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    wtf how they managed to find 1800 twins who agreed to do sexual experience on them ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not scientist but give me the 1,800 women and I will prove with my hands (and my tool) if exist or not.
    Everything will be properly recorded for the scientists of the Internet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:29 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nice image of the Deviluke twins, mmmmmmmmmm

    Comment by Niwa
    09:37 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Character aside Ishikei does put lot of detail into his art so thats well applauding

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:30 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Use money to research cures for terminal diseases than something like this...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I pity women.

    They are less intelligent, they are weaker, they have obstructing breasts which hinder their lives, they bleed monthly, they have to go through the worst imaginable pain when bearing children and they can't even enjoy sex. And the list goes on.

    What a fucking pathetic existence. I would probably just kill myself if I was a woman.. Or wouldn't I be intelligent enough to comprehend how pathetic I would be?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:18 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This survey would be like me asking a bunch of Equality Now supporters whether erogames should be banned, and then concluding from that research the erogames, in fact, should be banned. Fail.

    Comment by SnooSnoo
    20:44 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Omoshiroi hanashi desu, aniki

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    23:25 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    X100000000000000000

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:45 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Now I know you're not being in anyway serious but I still want to smack you upside the head for saying(typing)it.

    Comment by Akumaten
    09:36 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    and I don't pity you, just disgusted

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:43 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why does the truth disgust you? Are you religious or something?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:19 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol, London? G-spot porn was banned in Britain because "OMG SQUIRT IS PEE BUT WE'RE NOT SURE!!!" Now they are sure. They are telling the women who can cum better than your mom that their orgasms are unlawful. Great.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:23 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No G-Spot?
    Psh...
    Next thing you know, they'll be spouting how women's ejaculation is actually piss.

    Comment by Chrouya
    09:52 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This research doesn't prove the non-existence of the G-Spot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:56 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    G-Spot: Up, Down, Up Down, Left, Right, Select, Start

    If you want the study to be conclusive sent all of the twins used in the study to my adress ##, ***** lane, NY.

    I'll perform an extensive 10 year study in my basement.

    You'll have to provide me with millions of dollars in funding and lubrication.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:52 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    WRONG, G-spot: circle, circle, triangle, square, L1, R1, up, down, left, right, start.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:23 07/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    PaceFalm

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:02 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    British scientists, what do they know ...

    The closest thing they've ever been to a pussy is a cat.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    As long as the cat enjoyed it, I don't have a problem.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:29 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    A cat is fine too.

    Comment by H-Ero
    21:08 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Silly anon, don't you know that a cat is fine too?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:02 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Technically, these twins are all blondes :| else the doctors were... did a doctor even try to see if they had one? you know... grapeseed oil + vigorous movement with fingers :| i mean, it's already proven that it's hard for oneself to find their own g-spot.. sometimes never possible..... unless you practice kegels and those balls that they hold in them.. :|

    Comment by Busy Person
    15:29 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually it was already searched with serveral scans and such and nothing was found, even scans while people had sex didn't find it and what can't be foiund in the body isn't a part of the body.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:48 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like the picture XD

    Comment by g0dslay3r
    09:36 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    what about the men's gspot

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:47 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    We know it exists - it is the prostate.

    Comment by g0dslay3r
    13:41 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    how did they prove that?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:57 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    rectal examination

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:38 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So... How does this prove anything? They simply "asked" some twins if they had a G-Spot and they found out by asking that "no, they don't".

    Really?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:18 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, shucks! No wonder I couldn't find the damn thing!

    Seriously though, I've always been under the impression that the g-spot was the back end of the clitoris. It is common knowledge that there is much variance in the sensitivity of women's clits; I've had some girlfriends who would jump around if I touched it just a little bit, and others who wanted me to chew on it. Perhaps a study should be done on highly libidinous women since they are more likely to be sensitive to clitoral stimulation (at either end), and more in tune with their bodies in general.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:35 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The G-spot is actually said to be inside the vagina, it has nothing to do with the clitoris.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:54 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Quoting myself here: "...the back end of the clitoris..." and "...under the impression..."

    The clitoris is several centimeters long and intrudes into the female body on the anterior side of the vagina, kinda near where everybody thinks the G-spot is. Okay, sure, the urethral sponge is in between the vagina and the clit, but this does not necessarily preclude the possibility of stimulating the clit from within. Not saying I'm right, but its as good a theory as most. Now am I making sense to you?

    Comment by Artefact

    Sign on and you shall have it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:59 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dang! This was supposed to be a reply to Anon 09:19 06/01/2010

    I could really use an "edit comment" or "delete comment" function right about now. Whaddaya say, Artefact?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:18 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should fund another $30,000,000,000 study to make sure twins can be born with a G-spot and if non twins have a higher chance of having a G-spot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:00 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fund me even half of that and I'll do that as a lifetime research.

    Comment by Fonzer
    08:54 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes proper meals and exercise helps.
    But having more sex to train your pussy muscle helps both to increase a better sexual expirience.
    Try having more sex :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:50 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    All that G-Spot talk and it's all made up? OH MY GOODNESS!!!

    Seriously, though, it's not a big deal. People will still completely believe in it, even though it's not logical. Take several religions, for example....

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:20 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Take ALL religions" would be the proper example...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:58 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for only having identical twins in the study. And honestly, it would just be a cluster of nerves, so who's to say environment doesn't play a part?

    But oh well. It's not like anyone with a girlfriend actually believed there was an "I WIN" button anyway. ;p

    Comment by Sithreis
    09:03 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The 'I Win' button is the enter button on any keypad connected to a credit card swipe machine......

    incidentally, you still lose even when winning.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:31 06/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    thats classic mate!





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments