Home Nudity Man Guilty of Indecent Exposure

maggie-mui-coffee-exhibitionist.jpg

A court has judged a man guilty of indecent exposure after a female passerby observed him naked in his own kitchen and complained to police.

The 29-year-old Virginia man, himself a father, was charged with indecent exposure after being spotted by a mother and her young son passing by; the details of this “crime” are presented in the previous report on the incident.

Despite his protestations that he was innocently moving about his own kitchen whilst preparing coffee, police and courts insisted he had committed an act of lewdness offensive to public decency.

The judge handling the case agreed with prosecutors that being naked in his own home was “indecent,” and rendered a guilty verdict, though he magnanimously refrained from handing down a prison sentence or taking his daughter into care. An appeal is planned.

The convicted sex criminal finally seems to realise his expectations of privacy in his own home are unreasonable:

“I feel the exact feelings that they’re speaking – I’ve put onto other people. They’re looking into my home. I live in a fishbowl, an ant farm. Everyone’s looking inside my house now. That’s ok.”

The man admitted he was foolish in not closing the curtains, but with characteristic self-preservation the judge responded “I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail.”

The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer, is reportedly pleased with his conviction.

Via Fox.



    Post Comment »
    239 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    17:35 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Same thing happened to a Singaporean man who was drinking coffee naked in his apartment by the window.

    A woman saw him naked and reported him to the police. He was arrested for indecent exposure to the public. If I remembered correctly, he was handed a fine of S$2000.

    Comment by HentaiKamen
    17:24 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    “I don’t fine people for being stupid. I'd be broke.”
    - Virginia Judge

    Comment by Sotanaht
    16:59 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He desperately needs to file a civil suit against that Nazi. Just picturing her smug look at the news infuriates me.

    Comment by HentaiKamen
    17:22 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Me too. I wish somebody would rape that smug bitch.

    I cannot believe this shit. How can they charge him guilty for this? Is there no justice left in this world?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:45 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats what you get for living in the dumbest country in the world.

    Comment by H-Ero
    17:20 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This man's lawyer must be terrible.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:13 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HAHAHAHAHA, this is why I don't have any intention of moving to the US anytime soon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:42 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't really get how a male child could be traumatized by seeing a man naked. I mean he's got the same equipment, hell he's probably seen his dad's before.
    When I was little I took baths with both of my parents, but then again they also let me run around the beach nude till I was five. I guess having a father in the Navy and living in Europe where that kinda shit is normal will do that to ya.
    (I'm American BTW but I lived in Italy for five years from 1-6 yrs old)

    But I digress; WTF I can't even be naked at home anymore? What has this country come to? I thought that a Man's home was his castle. Shouldn't a king be permitted to walk around his castle naked at 5:30am to get a cup of Joe. I don't even know what to say.............

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:45 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HOLY SHIT! They're outside of your windowless room watching your fap!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:45 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder how naked people can induce trauma...

    I believe that even in the US there are some public events with naked people.. like PETA protesters for example

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:43 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And this is why America is stupid.

    Comment by MechaTama31
    14:34 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sucks for that guy, but at least we got to see that picture of Maggie again... :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:07 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow, America!!!
    oyu peek into someone house instead of getting charged. you charge the house owner.

    Comment by Sir Romance
    14:06 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While the fact that the man was arrested for being naked in his own home scares me, what's even scarier is the fact that the woman reported him in the first place.

    Note that she could have just passed his "indecency" off as a blunder or mistake (which is actually the case) instead of going out of her way to convict a mostly innocent person of the smallest crime.

    I'm afraid that US citizens are becoming less forgiving and more judgmental. Jail is obviously not nice, therefore we must not be too quick to exile people there and be more sympathetic.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck the US, "County of Freedom" is just bullshit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:49 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid woman. She's the one doing the voyeur. She's stupid, stupid, STUPID!!!

    Comment by drunkspiderman667
    13:53 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i think ill find where this chick lives and just murder her.

    Comment by diskonline
    14:01 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer

    That's the point.

    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    14:40 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is AmeriKKKa for you...

    Caters to the parasites, worships the true thieves, the rich elite, driven by moralists who see the Devil everywhere but when they look in the mirror...

    And it must end, though it'll probably lumber and crash in a few decades.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:04 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OMG I KNOW RITE?! NWO will kill us all and turn us into mind drooling retards and each of us will have a tracking chip if not already.

    FEMA nuff said.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:09 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    FUCKING WHAT THE FUCKKKKK AMERICA?
    WHAT THE FUCK AMERICA? FUCKING WHAT?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:06 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd have jailed that woman for excessive display of stupidity!

    Comment by Cerenado
    16:17 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    “I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail.” <-- QFT.

    Comment by SaruDa
    16:30 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because fines = jail.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:18 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    happened in singapore ten years ago... not surprised

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:30 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The next thing you know, we'll be sued for shitting because it's indecent...

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:58 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Proves that women are spiteful beings.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:35 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so i wonder what is more serious, peeping or the peeped people being naked... wtf

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:43 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Rightfully charged

    Comment by Riiku
    15:05 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Such thing as "Decency" is fucking bullshit

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:26 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    apparently this Yvette Dean deserves everything she'll get from the anons of the world...lololol

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:11 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The search engines are your friends there can't be many Yvette Deans in Springfield Virginia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:21 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That bitch should be the one who got arrested!
    She's probably some kind of a perverted peeper.
    :/

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:33 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    to be honest, this is like the joke I've heard about a burgler slipping on an ice cube in a man's house and sueing the man for endangering his life. What surprises me is that, although the judge admits to his stupidity, HE STILL CHARGES THIS UNLUCKY MAN WITH INDECENT EXPOSURE!!! Okay, I could go on about everything everyone already knows, but WTF? He's only guilty for being subjected to this crap, he's not a sex offender, he's just unlucky. What I'm wondering is why she walked onto his property, she probably was peeping on him with her son as an excuse, and got caught.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:16 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Doesn't this article already appeared (with the same image and text) on October 25?

    Why publish it again? A server error?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:48 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, the earlier article was about the man getting charged, this article is about how the court actually found him guilty of indecent exposure. Might not sound as much difference, but it's actually the difference between "sigh, to many idiots around" and "there goes my faith for humanity...".

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:35 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Where are you from? I can't wait to google your pathetic country and find out all the weird, demented, stupid shit that you folks do.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:52 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Weird, demented and stupid shit? Must be from USA or UK surely.

    Comment by ariska666
    05:40 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is just ... not right...I mean damn what is going on with our government ... they'll believe whatever a women says but not a man...wow

    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    09:17 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That bitch needs to be convicted for the lewd act of looking into another persons house. She must do that to every fucking house for her morning cheap tricks it seems.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:43 27/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm surprised to see how easy it is to be convicted of PUBLIC indecency inside of your house.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:02 18/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i have the woman broght up on charges of voyuerism, trespassing and possably child abuse cause if she and her kid were walking through this guys yard at 5:30 am it would mean that her kid had to have been waken up befor that time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:07 09/10/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Double standard FTW.
    Man watches a girl be naked around her house, he gets arrested and deemed a sex offender.
    Woman watches man be naked around his house, minding his own business, he still gets arrested and deemed a sex offender.
    I wanna know why this woman was around his property with her kid so early and why no one is finding that questionable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:24 23/01/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    I say we molotov that bitch's house.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:04 22/02/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    It could be fun it Wlliamson's lawyer would have completely turned the tables: He could have claimed that the people who saw Williamson were voyeurs, stalkers, peeping-toms. Who goes in the early hours of the morning looking through others' windows? Only perverts do that! Did the man know he was being watched? No! Did he make sexual gestures? No! However, someone was looking into other people's homes early in the morning. Who does that? Only perverts do it!

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:14 12/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I live really close to where this happened, and not only was he doing this in his own home, but the only reason the woman saw him in the first place is because she was taking a shortcut ON HIS PROPERTY. That's right, she was trespassing, saw him in the window, and decided that she would make a show to her son how shocked she was by pursuing charges against the man.

    Comment by Bronxdragon
    10:46 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is stupid how did that bitch win that case....he was in his fuckin house...by himself...in his damn kitchen naked....what was the dumb bitch doing lookin in his window he should have countered sued her ass for like uhhhh whats the term...something privacy something...whatever lol.
    Oh yeah double standard bet you if that bitch was caught naked not only would "he" have lost the case but he would be in prison.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:39 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Putting away fact that woman was policeman wife, I think he would win if he was first in suing her for abuse of privacy

    Comment by man1
    02:28 29/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The guy should have Esukariborugu-ed her when he had the chance.

    "Pi-piru-piru-piru-pi-piru-pi... NOT!"

    Come to think of it, instead of it might be a case of sexism, it might be a case of DO NOT WANT in which the woman can't unsee the possibly horrifying sight of the guy's, er, lil' bro, hence the prosecution.

    Regardless, LAW FAIL.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:24 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should sue the woman for peeping.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:25 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is bullshit
    WTF was she doing at a time like that anyway ???

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:52 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And that's why I don't live in the Bible Belt.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:47 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well better than a guy who is chased by a bunch of wild animals in a zoo, get his clothes ripped and has tanks, jet fighters and soldiers on his tail

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:45 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Isn't this repeated?

    I swear I saw this same new before here...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:55 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It isn't repeated. The first one stated that it happened. This one states that the dude actually was found guilty for it.

    I once thought about moving to America, but now I saw this, fuck that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:48 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer, is reportedly pleased with his conviction."

    What a bitch.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:14 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No she goes above and beyond being a bitch this woman is a cunt.

    22:28 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer..."

    Corruption at its best, huh..?

    “I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail.”

    Awesome quote, dude. That soccer mom really needs to be jailed for peeping him... Oh wait, that would only be accepted if it's the other way around. Woman sees a nakky guy in his house; exhibitionist. Guy sees a nakky woman in her house; peeping tom.. WTF?

    Comment by Red Comet
    03:16 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's circle jerking and teabag politics in action.

    This is what I call good ol boy networks and behind the scenes decision making.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:59 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If the guy was walking around exposed in full view of anyone outside (whether intentionally or not) then I don't have much sympathy for him. That's why he probably got nailed: someone could see him with a casual glance rather than having to specifically peep.

    I also occasionally walk around the house naked, but I keep any windows low enough to allow passersby to see my nether regions covered with blinds. It's just basic decency.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:03 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You are wrong, according to Virginia law intent with knowledge that someone is watching is required if you want to charge (and convict) someone of indecent exposure. Also, the mom and her kid saw him in his kitchen when they cut across his yard, and not from a public road or street.

    The reason he got convicted was because the story told in court is a bit different than the one told here in most new articles, in court they had dug up 3 people who claimed they had seen him, and that he even after seeing them had not tried to hide.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/21/crimesider/entry6006155.shtml

    Personally, I still think he didn't do anything wrong even if it really happened the way told in court. Then again I also doubt the credibility of those testimonies, sounds a awful lot like made up stories to cover for the mom so she doesn't end up looking like the fool she is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:10 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I read in one news article that she wasn't even in the street, she was actually going down some sort of alley or path that cut through the dude's yard. I mean what a fucking bitch.

    Comment by R3TAK
    02:33 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well that'll teach him to be naked in his own kitchen.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:55 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Every baby should be convicted as soon as it's born. Unless it's wearing clothes of course.

    Comment by loli_freakshow
    20:37 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this pisses me of so fucking much...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:40 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What is with that judge? Stupid? You call some guy that forgot to close his curtains stupid? What the F man, what the F!?

    Comment by Stiyl-Magnus19
    11:41 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    eto... is his own house...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:33 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Arresting somebody for being naked in his own house is just wrong, afterall she is the one that obvisiously looked into his house so she is at fault for assaulting his privacy, afterall she doesn't needs to look into somebody else house, she was just peeping.
    (non american here)

    Comment by SnooSnoo
    11:33 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should sue the woman for not being in the kitchen.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:43 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Huh, just thought of an idea, peep into a window of a couple having sex and sue them for doing it whist you looking!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:50 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    well in my country if someone were to take a walk in the park in his underwear, we would just mumble about it for some time and just leave him be. It's up to the police to see if they want to get him or not. The law is bad here, but thats the good thing

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:43 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    People with no curtains over windows do have something to hide. This guy would not have had a problem if he had curtains or even a blanket stapled over the window. Turns out it was a mom and her son, so I guess the son is so freaked hes going to have a sex change operation too now because of this?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:44 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    only in Confederate America...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:45 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well the woman shouldnt have looked into the house at the first place. Maybe she should be the one charged for peeping

    Comment by Miroku74
    11:58 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd charge her for felonious cock-sucking with the intent to swallow the evidence... if such a charge existed in the Penile.... err, Penal Code.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:13 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder how that whore would feel if someone peeped through her windows and had HER arrested for the audacity to disrobe in HER home.

    God help her if she's caught fucking her husband and a passerby hears them and gets it on tape...send that cop and b***h to prison.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:35 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She's female, All she would need to due is counter sue for invasion of privacy, she would win.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:47 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No need for our peeping tom to be a male, why not send another mom with kid, you know, gotta protect those kids!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:17 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even better charge the woman with something like bodily harm or violence to your eyes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:14 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Truly the land of FREEDOOM.

    Comment by Niwa
    11:17 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep Good ole U S of Fuckin A am i right anon?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:18 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah you are.
    Maybe I should register, would make things easier.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:30 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol.

    idiot religious people/ moral crusaders are to blame.. minds too damn dirty to flinch on a naked man.

    Comment by Niwa
    11:42 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    meh Moral Crusaders and what not have sticks up their asses so why bother?

    other than that she was peeping either way and bringing her kid was just so she could pin blame

    Comment by mikejacobs14
    11:07 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh shit, so this finally happened? Poor dude is gunna suffer injustice.

    Comment by Syllen
    11:06 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should be able to do whatever he wants in his own house

    Comment by icecoldgangstaa
    11:59 29/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree. Also, wouldn't it be considered an invasion of privacy since the woman herself peered into HIS house? He can do whatever the hell he wants; it's HIS house. If a person can't be naked in their own home, how do you expect them to change their clothes? -__-

    It's the woman's fault for deciding to look into another's house.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:28 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can someone, anyone, please link me to hard evidence that seeing the human body and/or sex will do children any psychological harm?

    How is less than 1% of the human body offensive or even harmful? So what if the penis/vagina are sex organs. They aren't engaged in sex 99.9% of the time. How can something we all have, use on a daily basis, and use to have pleasure and create life be indecent or obscene?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:54 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think this is Matthew McConaughey, I can remember seeing a report on E! regarding a similar incident and the circumstances are the same also

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Americans! They can be THAT stupid and retarded for sure.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:26 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh, right. Nothing stupid ever happens anywhere else in the world, which is all a Utopia.
    Uh-huh.

    Comment by moonchow
    11:07 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But Big Brother (sister?) is watching...
    So put some damn pants on.

    Seriously though, this is retarded. Par for the course for the U.S. legal system it seems.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:22 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or at least close the curtains and/or turn out the light. You're only allowed to be naked if no one can see you, you know.

    Comment by Sylar
    18:57 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It was 5:30 o'clock in the morning. Really how the fuck could he know that they are crazy women who take little kids for walks threw his yard at such hours?
    Actually: Let the poor kid sleep, you bitch!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:47 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    that fucking whore is a mad woman who abuses her husband status of policeman and goes around "i'm going to sue you bitch".

    That bitch should get a pwned by an incoming car. WTF is wrong with her? It's not like the dude was staring at her and her son while jerking off. Fucking whore.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:07 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because realistically nudity is sinful, right? Sex is a sinful act, and as such anyone and everyone who had sex regardless of reason should be punished, right? Because parents these days are so fucking stupid and complacent in raising their kids that they need the MOTHERFUCKING government to intervene and protect their kids, right?

    While I agree kids are easily impressionable, I don't fucking believe seeing a naked man aside from one's father or self to be fucking traumatizing. If our society is so goddamned hell-bent on eliminating sexuality from the youths, why the fuck don't they just ban youths from the internet? Better yet, FUCKING EDUCATE THEM. Also another FYI is that kids aren't stupid. Watching 'PORN' will not fuck up their lives anymore than their parents and society beating up on them for having a healthy sex drive.

    Comment by Endeavor
    23:31 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    “I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail.”

    At least the judge admits his own stupidity... And no sir, there are some of us that aren't stupid either...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:49 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The funny things?
    In the "dark age" nudity was ok. Churches were full of naked statues.
    When the "dark age" finished nudity became a sin.
    It's pretty hilarious.

    Also
    >The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer
    Mmmhmh,

    Comment by TNinja
    14:28 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    At least he didn't get life time. Which is a soon to be standard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:02 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    These verdict and sentences are sexist.

    There are Mens' Rights Movements that he could join.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:50 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Very much inclined to agree with Sylar. Since when did women become more special than men? They. are. not.

    Comment by Sylar
    18:55 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This whole thing is ridiculous. If he was the one seeing her naked from the window they would have convicted him for being a peeping tom.
    A man just can't get a break.

    Comment by tyciol
    02:40 07/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Honestly, I think if this man was being raped in his own home, he'd still get convicted for being nude.

    Comment by Shanyy
    23:03 27/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail." Totally indeed.

    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    00:21 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ 23:11
    Sir, your epic graph just explained the whole verbally inexpressible problem SanCom has been telling us about for years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:11 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @19.50
    Well in society it is
    here's the proof

    http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/ob/masturbation/sexismmasturbation.jpg

    Comment by Schrobby
    12:01 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd bring up charges against the bitch for peeping on me.

    Comment by Niwa
    11:08 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Course Its the guys own house It's the women who convicted him whos really at fault here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:22 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should file a peeping tom complaint against her.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:05 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    From someone who lives in the states I can only see this guy is poor or not very rich. Any good attorney could have ripped that women apart in court showing that she is some kind of pipping tom.

    That is one problem in the states you want to win a case, bring the money baby, common sense is bullshit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:37 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The issue is that the judge and the police had been offended via someone who knew them. Buddy system in full effect! The verdict was hers, and hers alone. She condemned him when she looked in and found out her husband isn't the biggest around.
    That kid prolly gets beat up daily now.

    Comment by Sylar
    18:59 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She probably used the kid.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:43 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if this man is guilty of indecent exposure, i fear for all of us

    Comment by Dreck
    11:31 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And further reading into the verdict..

    They declare people must only dry hump during "sex" in addition to closing their curtains...so as to not offend the eyes of the lass gawking through your upstairs bedroom window, via a tree.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:10 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @Sarissofoi

    Let me guess, you're right-leaning in your politics and you're a Yank. They're the only ones I've ever seen make that mistake. They see the word socialism and it almost seems like their mind gets locked or something.

    National Socialism has about as much to do with Socialism as the following:

    - Pennsylvania Dutch and the Netherlands. These guys were Germans not Dutch, that was simply a mistranslation of the term Deutsch, which is German for.... German.

    - French Fries originating in France. They're from Belgium, and while the Walloons might act a lot like Frenchman, they're about as French as the Québécois are, or the Cajuns for that matter.

    - Equality Now and them actually being interested in Equality. All they care about is power over others, whatever the cost.

    Just because someone calls something or someone something, does not mean that they are what is claimed. Example: A member of the Washington Redskins isn't really a Native American indigenous to the area of Washington State. (Which would be Yakama, Wanapum or Colville.)

    National Socialism has more in common with Fascism than it does with regular Socialism. And Fascism is very much right wing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:40 24/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Ask any credible Historian where the Nazi's fit on the left/right scale and all of them will say on the right hand side.

    That's not redefining things, that's just you not being able to handle the truth.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:22 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    off saving children who don't exist

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:24 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, that's why National Socialism set up socialized medicine, government-controlled and tax financed day care centers and pensions, and lots of other things right wingers are always clamoring for.
    But redefining things to suit your purposes was a nice try.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:34 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not rightism or leftism, it's authoritarianism.

    The swiss are left, Stalin was left, Stalin was a firm believer in authoritarianism...the swiss are authoritarian in saturday night live skits.

    Comment by grgpsunk
    12:57 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hitler was in the right, and he was pretty "authoritarian", so to speak. But I can't think of a right-wing leadership that was ever "non-authoritarian".

    So much for the "authoritarian" theory. It's the conservatives with their puritanical view on things and you know it. If you think people in West Virginia are inbred dumbasses, where do you think they originally came from?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:24 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i thought human rights people would be all over this one... where have they gone?

    Comment by Sarissofoi
    13:06 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hitler was on left. You know nazi-national SOCIALISM. How socialism can by on right?
    And Stalin and Hitler(comunnism and nazism) cooperate longer that they fight.
    German Blitzkrieg was fueled by soviet suppllies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:58 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    socialism and comunisim just around the bend people take over most of the business in america then manage everyone because carbondioxide is dangerous to the enviroment. I think verdicts like these prove that this is where we are going.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:16 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What does socialism have to do with it? If anything, it's rightist movements that condone a loss of privacy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:26 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    watch it next time you masturbate , you'll get arrested for indecency after jerking off in your own bathroom

    Comment by BlaqCat
    11:32 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Y'know..I thought about that ever since this story originally broke. I now keep the blinds in my room shut unless I'm completely dressed. How sad is that?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:17 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol theres a kindergarden right below my apartment complex and theres a road that can look straight into my house...........i feel very violated even though i'm in the safety of my own home :(

    Comment by Sylar
    19:07 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There a high school(only last three years, Japan way) under my apartment but my fucking window faces the other way around. It's so sad to be so near the show and not being able to enjoy it. And i probably still can't walk naked with open windows because there other buildings facing mine. Guys from other apartments could probably see me.
    It's all loss for me.

    Comment by TehBoringOne
    01:14 23/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's child protection for you... You lose your right to privacy, they lose their right to think... Because in the book of the lawmakers, children just can't.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:31 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i live on the side of the mountain , my windows facing start into elementary school grounds and are on the same level due to the slope . I cant even walk around in my underwear when my window is open :'(

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:03 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not in the USA... THIS.IS.AMERICA!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:26 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sad... isn't it...

    that bitch is also 1 of us... it shames me so =_=......

    anyone get the feeling she's some radical religious person? no offense to the normal religious people of course, but it's just people who complain about something like that... wow...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:07 22/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Almost sound like that movie with the cop screw over the family. Money is all that mater in the states, people really just think they are safe been just normal people haha, not in this country, there is always some waco waiting to screw you over, better not to trust anyone not even your neighbors in the states, or who know who will file a complaint on you for what ever.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments