Woman Gets 60 Years for Sex with 12-Year-Olds

@Anon 20:25

Lucky? Have you take a good look at her picture? I'd say they're luck were eaten away

Look at the picture in the source article.

That woman is ... not visually attractive.

The article doesn't say whether she seduced them, or forced them.

To all the guys who say I'd be sweet to get laid by their teacher when they were young:
She's a 33 year old mother of 2. I can't find picks but I'm guessing she's past her prime.
I for one was flashed by a teacher when I was in primary school. I can remember her tattoo. Based on what she said, I think now that she was trying to seduce me. At the time I had no idea what to do and was too embarrassed to tell anyone.
If she had been halfway decent, maybe I would have felt differently, but I did not want a piece of that. I wanted nothing to do a desperate, rapidly aging Christmas cake, and I don't want it now.

>also forcing her to register as a violent sex offender.

I think that solves whether they went willingly or not.

And, hell, they're 11 and 12. I'm thinking they were glad to get whatever they could.

@Darkrockslizer

The courts didn't site what the kids had to say about it because they don't give a shit on the opinion of a person until they turn 18. They think people aren't capable of formulating thoughts in this country till 18 and that we can't handle our alcohol before the age of 21.

But of course they have an opinion on being allowed to have sex earlier and earlier. They can also drive cars at an earlier age.

Wait a second... And they have problems with teens getting married or getting pregnant at an early age but don't want to restrain sex socially?

For whatever reason kids are having more sexual activity at an early age be it the hormones in foods or lack of culture, it makes no difference. The end result is still the lack of acceptance of and demonizing of pregnancy and marriage at an early age.

I'd find it more amusing that instead of promoting relationships, more and more casual sex is happening as card and board games seem to go out the door...

While what she did was terrible, that sentence is extremely harsh. This kind of thing does not "make an example." That's the naivest shit I've ever heard. You don't go around molesting kids if you think you're going to get caught doing it. It's not a deterrent to anyone but the woman they put behind bars. While it /may/ be fair enough to lock her up until she has barely any sex drive left, she'll be lucky if she can still walk by the time that sentence is up.

A sentence like that is vengeance, not justice.

Missing in this whole discussion is how the boys feel.

Once again I'm shocked at how ridiculous the justice system in the US really is...

pfft i'd be depressed too if i learned i had to work at something to get it when i was getting easier before

it is sick. i would agree to sentence her for some time, making advantage of the shotacon but not finish her life ;/..
(by the way im getting curious about this tenga mobile vagina adding over this place, since i am a singel otaku. anybody has experience?

Society these days. People are really fucked up.
I mean in America rape has a higher sentence than MURDER! Wtf is wrong with this country's court??? Or peoples sense of justice? Oh wait. Im in SanCom >.>

I too don't agree with the sentence. Seeing how the prison population is exploding and is a huge burden on the economy and society I believe the death penalty should be more liberally used. She is a rapist.

It's not that it's a lack of acceptance, it's that this country tends to villainize sex. You can buy a game where you blow people to bits, but the second it has a nipple in it, it's like the world ends and angry mothers start bitching. Look at what happened with the Hot Coffee mod for GTA San Andreas.

a bit harsh, but we here say that the boys had a good time, cuz we're boys (some of us) and would enjoy the early experiance, but think of a girl at 10 or 11, would you be so nice? a child is a child. 60 years, is a bit much considering some only get house arrest for a year for doing the same crime. 20 years would have been good, for all, you touch the inocent no mater if man or woman you get 20 years, no i'm to pretty to go to jail BS.

mothers went a bit overboard thou.. but you would to if it was your child, if i had a daughter and found out someone touched her at that early age... one word.. Shotgun!

Such experiances like this can leave a emotional scar that it can ether leave them confused or depressed.

That's exactly what I always thought hearing people ask for hugely idiotic sentences for these cases. The offender are better off killing their victims. This is so retarded!
And anyway, these mothers are absolutely idiotic. If their sons are not faggot, they enjoyed the experience!

Oh darn. Her son lost his virginity and he'll never get it back. Meanwhile, someone just lost their life and they'll never get it back..

Wait a min...

2 boys have the time of their lives with a THREESOME over a year...

And she gets 60 yrs in the slammer...

OMFG, WHY DIDN'T I TAKE ADVANTAGE OF MY YOUTH!
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!
COME BACK, MY YOUTH!!!

I wonder why the court did not cite what the boys themselves had to say about this.

I dunno about others but I'd have been extremely happy to get laid at that age already.

To the anime character in the image above.

Not to some fat ugly ogre.

Lesson learned: If you're going to molest children, kill them and leave no evidence of molestation.

i dont even think i knew what sex was when i was 11 or 12, but again, that was a while ago and world was different!

Not really if you have looked at the photo of "her".

Most people do not look as their best when they are crying.
To my she is quite decent looking. How do most guys bashing her look? Not too good, i guess.
Of 60 years sentence the "justice" is giving i can say only one thing: INSANITY!

It's in the link. She doesn't look too bad for a 60 year old.

This is what justice has deteriotated into in America, sadly.

I thought the VIRGIN Mary got a creampie from the Holy Spirit, and poor ol Joe was just plain old cuckolded out of his unconsummated marriage???

Indeed, basically my position is.

If it was forced, raping boys is as bad as raping girls. If it is consensual, it's probably harmless, specially at age 12.

We don't know the circumstances behind how she was raping these boys. She may be a dominate female and penetrated the boys with objects to get her rocks off. Sexual deviance is different from what your casual idea of what sex is. She could have found a way to exploit these boys, blackmailed them into a sexual relationship with her, maybe she had naked pictures of them, with there genitalia being tiny, and forced them into a predatory sexual relationship where she violated the boys with a strap-on to feed her woman over man complex, remember she has a husband she can get normal size dick from. Assume these boys were violated in a way you wouldn't want to be violated, and then decide what someone should get for doing that to you.

15:19 anon is naive. I remember being 12 and knowing right and wrong quite clearly, 10 or below i might agree, 12 no.

What's the difference between the molestation of females or males? Uh, difference is when a woman molests a boy she's taking the dick! The kid isn't physically harmed as much as becoming possibly traumatised depending on the boy. When a man molests a young girl he is waaaay more likely to inflict harsher trauma upon the girl physically and emotionally.

Simply put, as a guy I can tell you, I'd rather be penetrating than being penetrated. That's why there's such a major difference between a man molesting a girl and a woman molesting a boy. Different physical attributes.

As for the sentence it is completely riddiculous to sentence any person to a 60 year sentence when if she would have rather murdered the boys she would only be sentenced to 20 years for murder. What kind of message does that send? Given the choice to molest or murder a criminal would much rather kill rather than spend practically a life sentence for rape.

There's a definite deference between 12 y/o boys, and 12 y/o girls when it comes to sex. For one thing, we males are pretty much expected to be predatory and lustful. This extend clear back into our teens (especially these days with the net and such). Obviously there are psych issues that could result from this, but my money is on the boys not regretting this at all.

Should it make a difference? Who cares if it was with males or females. Molestation is molestation. I'm more amused that the judge knew the people. Can this truly be impartial? She would probably been found guilty anyways but still.

While you are right the boys probably don't regret it (except perhaps because they got her jailed, I'd sure feel sorry about her) I don't agree that there is a definitive distinctintions between boys and girl here.

Firstly, legally, I cannot concent to there being harsher punishment for raping boy than for raping girls.

Secondly for the sggestion that girls can't be lustful at that age, actually lots of girls lose their virginity at 10-12, most girls that age masturbate and have sexual fantasies, including about older men, including "rape" fantasies. Little girls are nowhere as innocent as their parents wish them to be and consensual sex is not out of the question.

Consensual meaning willing. The current interpretation is that concent not only involves willingness but maturity age.

Which leads us to the odd abuntance of preteen girls being accused of C P for photographing themselves.

Yes, it's bullshit. The mothers are talking about the boys like they're girls losing their hymen and were raped. This shit happened for a year, they loved it, and boys lose nothing by having sex with an older woman, in fact they're going to get complimented all through high school if she was hot. If she were ugly, then the double standard, and by proxy this sentence, makes sense in an odd and incredibly sad way. If a woman wants to fuck a willing pubescent boy (which is to say nearly all the time), all that will happen is he'll have some experience for his girlfriend later.

Fuck our country.

It's not, its downright ridiculous.

I'd say give her maybe around 15. That seems to be about the length of incarceration for these types of cases.

lol, would you be saying the same thing if it was a 33-year old man and two 12-year old lolis?

Didn't think so, hypocrite.

Um...a male at twelve does not know what they are doing, not by the least. No way especially with hormones. But ya sucks for the kids. They probably wont regret it now, but ten or so years from now it'll probably hit them.

I would've been all over my 3rd grade teacher assistant...if only I had the chance...

lol! indeed. but if i were to have sex at 12 with a hot woman, i'm sure i would have not been a regular teenager. so idk.

It's simple really, without trying to sound sexist, I think you'll find it's much easier for a male pedo to push down a girl and rape her, than it is for a female pedo to push down a guy who in 8/10 wants it more than she does, especially at 12 years old, which is 1, more than enough years to know what you are doing, and by that age most kids these days are much larger in size than they used to be anyway, so yeh i do think a guy raping a little girl can be seen as worse than the visa versa case scenarios (not in all cases) but surely most.

most male pedos don't penetrate they're victims

You're right. It's infuriating. And the judge is jealous too.

I lol'd.

Just says how fucked up our country is, with all this injustice.

If you think that a 33 year-old woman is middle aged the you have setious problems.

lol you were not faping @ 11? Wow, i was @ 7 or 8, you are weird.

I did at 5. ROFLMAO.