Woman Gets 60 Years for Sex with 12-Year-Olds


A woman who had sexual relationships with two young boys has been handed a 60 year sentence.

The 33-year-old Indiana mother of two had sexual relationships with two boys, aged 11 and 12, over a one year period.

She was subsequently charged with 9 counts of child molestation.

One mother spoke of her surprise at the offender being a woman and her outrage at what was “taken” from her son:

“[She] took away the first relationship that my son will be able to have, the first girlfriend experience of a teen … the first intimate moment, the first everything that we as adults got to experience.

She’s left a mark on them, a mark that’s going to last the rest of their life. It’s never going to go away.

Society, I think, needs to step up to the plate as well and make sure they’re just not watching males, they need to be watching females as well.

I would’ve never in a million years thought a female would have done something like that to my child. But I guess we kinda walked around with blinders on.”

The other mother is even more hysterical, haranguing the judge for as long a sentence as possible:

“My son is going to have a long road ahead of him.

As far as I’m concerned there is no sentence in this world that is good enough. You took every precious moment he could experience in his life.

You preyed on him and then when you were done with him you preyed on the other one.

I ask you, your honor, if you would please do the fullest extent, as much as you possibly can, because this is going to set an example for all of the other women out there that are doing it and getting by with it. No one is standing up for our sons … and at some point someone has to. I have no pity for you.”

The court ignored the woman’s pleas for mercy and sentenced her to two consecutive 30 year sentences, also forcing her to register as a violent sex offender.

The average sentence for murder in the US is 15-20 years…

Via the News and Tribune.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of zealtron
    Comment by zealtron
    11:20 14/12/2009 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Hmm, 60 years...sounds a bit harsh don't ya think?

    Avatar of Karura
    Comment by Karura
    11:28 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    That's pretty much a life sentence without the "life" in it, considering that she doesn't live up to 93 years old.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:13 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    That's how it is. Why? Because it is cheaper than giving an actual life sentence or execution.

    I'm more amused that you would get off with less time killing an individual. You can get 30 years molesting someone's daughter and 20 years for killing the governor...

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    12:40 14/12/2009 # ! Good (+0.7)

    Wait a min...

    2 boys have the time of their lives with a THREESOME for over a year, and she gets 60yrs behind bars?


    Comment by Anonymous
    18:32 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Look at the picture in the source article.

    That woman is ... not visually attractive.

    The article doesn't say whether she seduced them, or forced them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:57 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @Anon 20:25

    Lucky? Have you take a good look at her picture? I'd say they're luck were eaten away

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:30 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    To all the guys who say I'd be sweet to get laid by their teacher when they were young:
    She's a 33 year old mother of 2. I can't find picks but I'm guessing she's past her prime.
    I for one was flashed by a teacher when I was in primary school. I can remember her tattoo. Based on what she said, I think now that she was trying to seduce me. At the time I had no idea what to do and was too embarrassed to tell anyone.
    If she had been halfway decent, maybe I would have felt differently, but I did not want a piece of that. I wanted nothing to do a desperate, rapidly aging Christmas cake, and I don't want it now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:13 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    >also forcing her to register as a violent sex offender.

    I think that solves whether they went willingly or not.

    And, hell, they're 11 and 12. I'm thinking they were glad to get whatever they could.

    Avatar of Smiling Jack
    Comment by Smiling Jack
    22:00 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    The courts didn't site what the kids had to say about it because they don't give a shit on the opinion of a person until they turn 18. They think people aren't capable of formulating thoughts in this country till 18 and that we can't handle our alcohol before the age of 21.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:01 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While what she did was terrible, that sentence is extremely harsh. This kind of thing does not "make an example." That's the naivest shit I've ever heard. You don't go around molesting kids if you think you're going to get caught doing it. It's not a deterrent to anyone but the woman they put behind bars. While it /may/ be fair enough to lock her up until she has barely any sex drive left, she'll be lucky if she can still walk by the time that sentence is up.

    A sentence like that is vengeance, not justice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:08 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But of course they have an opinion on being allowed to have sex earlier and earlier. They can also drive cars at an earlier age.

    Wait a second... And they have problems with teens getting married or getting pregnant at an early age but don't want to restrain sex socially?

    For whatever reason kids are having more sexual activity at an early age be it the hormones in foods or lack of culture, it makes no difference. The end result is still the lack of acceptance of and demonizing of pregnancy and marriage at an early age.

    I'd find it more amusing that instead of promoting relationships, more and more casual sex is happening as card and board games seem to go out the door...

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:32 21/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Missing in this whole discussion is how the boys feel.

    Avatar of Rokudaime
    Comment by Rokudaime
    05:59 28/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Once again I'm shocked at how ridiculous the justice system in the US really is...

    Avatar of Musashi75
    Comment by Musashi75
    10:22 14/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    it is sick. i would agree to sentence her for some time, making advantage of the shotacon but not finish her life ;/..
    (by the way im getting curious about this tenga mobile vagina adding over this place, since i am a singel otaku. anybody has experience?

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:59 07/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Society these days. People are really fucked up.
    I mean in America rape has a higher sentence than MURDER! Wtf is wrong with this country's court??? Or peoples sense of justice? Oh wait. Im in SanCom >.>

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:11 16/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    pfft i'd be depressed too if i learned i had to work at something to get it when i was getting easier before

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:44 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I too don't agree with the sentence. Seeing how the prison population is exploding and is a huge burden on the economy and society I believe the death penalty should be more liberally used. She is a rapist.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:08 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    a bit harsh, but we here say that the boys had a good time, cuz we're boys (some of us) and would enjoy the early experiance, but think of a girl at 10 or 11, would you be so nice? a child is a child. 60 years, is a bit much considering some only get house arrest for a year for doing the same crime. 20 years would have been good, for all, you touch the inocent no mater if man or woman you get 20 years, no i'm to pretty to go to jail BS.

    mothers went a bit overboard thou.. but you would to if it was your child, if i had a daughter and found out someone touched her at that early age... one word.. Shotgun!

    Avatar of Smiling Jack
    Comment by Smiling Jack
    09:57 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not that it's a lack of acceptance, it's that this country tends to villainize sex. You can buy a game where you blow people to bits, but the second it has a nipple in it, it's like the world ends and angry mothers start bitching. Look at what happened with the Hot Coffee mod for GTA San Andreas.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    13:56 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Such experiances like this can leave a emotional scar that it can ether leave them confused or depressed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:51 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh darn. Her son lost his virginity and he'll never get it back. Meanwhile, someone just lost their life and they'll never get it back..

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:48 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To the anime character in the image above.

    Not to some fat ugly ogre.

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    14:34 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wait a min...

    2 boys have the time of their lives with a THREESOME over a year...

    And she gets 60 yrs in the slammer...


    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    14:42 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder why the court did not cite what the boys themselves had to say about this.

    I dunno about others but I'd have been extremely happy to get laid at that age already.

    Avatar of notanother4non
    Comment by notanother4non
    15:50 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i dont even think i knew what sex was when i was 11 or 12, but again, that was a while ago and world was different!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:00 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's exactly what I always thought hearing people ask for hugely idiotic sentences for these cases. The offender are better off killing their victims. This is so retarded!
    And anyway, these mothers are absolutely idiotic. If their sons are not faggot, they enjoyed the experience!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:16 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lesson learned: If you're going to molest children, kill them and leave no evidence of molestation.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Damn, lucky boys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:58 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    These boys are SO gonna brag about this when they'll reach their teens :D

    Comment by Busy
    01:01 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not really if you have looked at the photo of "her".

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    04:03 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Most people do not look as their best when they are crying.
    To my she is quite decent looking. How do most guys bashing her look? Not too good, i guess.
    Of 60 years sentence the "justice" is giving i can say only one thing: INSANITY!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:09 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's in the link. She doesn't look too bad for a 60 year old.

    Avatar of greenpoint0
    Comment by greenpoint0
    17:47 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Earliest chance of parole: 8 years. Each.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:46 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    60 years is about 30 years of good behaviour

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:23 20/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you only get 5 years for a man with a boy

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:07 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "William F. Buckley reminisces about a dinner in Monaco with Prince Ranier and David Niven:
    "Waiting for the first course to arrive, David Launched into an autobiographical account of his seduction at age 15 by an accomplished lady of the night. The words spoken were lightly ribald, amusing, evocative. Before the second course was served, the prince was a rollicking companion..."
    Obviously, in telling this "ribald" and "rollicking" tale, Niven didn't think of himself as a "victim" of "rape" or "child sexual abuse." Nor did Buckley, Ranier, or anyone else, male or female, think any such thing.
    But if Niven were alive today and had "launched" into this "autobiographical account" as the guest speaker at a convention of "mental health professionals," social workers, police investigators, victim's advocates, prosecutors, and judges, poor David would be viewed as a "victim" of "child sexual abuse," and his delight in telling this story would be attributed to "denial" and/or "male socialization." The virtually unanimous response would be indignation, for many even rage, directed at the "rapist" and especially a society that could brainwash a "victim" and "survivor" into believing he enjoyed a heinous and life-destroying violation. (vaginal intercourse - what causes life to be and the essense of life and makes the world go around)
    At sentencing, prosecutors and psychiatrists would compare his trauma to that of people who've experienced warfare, torture, vicious beatings, dog attacks, gruesome car accidents, and internment in concentration camps. The woman would be classified as a deviant and compelled to underago "sex-offender treatment" as well as register with the police for 20 years if not the rest of her life so people could be notifed that a "convicted sex offender" is living in their community or neighborhood.
    And so, too, with the woman played by Jennifer O'Neal in The Summer of 42. If this movie were remade today, it should end or begin with Jennifer O'Neal being transported to prison in handcuffs attached to a waistchain and leg-irons."

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:34 28/05/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nah, she raped children, right? She deserves it... pain can destroy sins, y'know?

    06:45 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is pretty harsh I say at the worst she deserved 7 to 10 years.
    BTW to dumb fucks who say bitch deserved that sentence well you can pay the $36,700 a year it'll cost to house her in prison for the next 60 years.

    This why I'd like to purge the Puritan element from my country with extreme prejudice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:01 07/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ikr WTF? Their mothers are a bit dumb and spoilt, I think coming from what they said in court. "I want you to give her the longest possible punishment..." Yep. Sounds like a bitch.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:38 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, this is justice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:45 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sure... how about a 33-year old man (Joseph) and ONE 12-year old loli? (Mary).
    burn in hell for the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit... hypocrite. lol
    God says it's all good.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:03 07/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is what justice has deteriotated into in America, sadly.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:15 02/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I thought the VIRGIN Mary got a creampie from the Holy Spirit, and poor ol Joe was just plain old cuckolded out of his unconsummated marriage???

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:41 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    11:40 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It would be justice if she gave those kids AIDS. I don't see how this is justice.

    Avatar of yuriphoria
    Comment by yuriphoria
    01:05 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Indeed, basically my position is.

    If it was forced, raping boys is as bad as raping girls. If it is consensual, it's probably harmless, specially at age 12.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:34 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We don't know the circumstances behind how she was raping these boys. She may be a dominate female and penetrated the boys with objects to get her rocks off. Sexual deviance is different from what your casual idea of what sex is. She could have found a way to exploit these boys, blackmailed them into a sexual relationship with her, maybe she had naked pictures of them, with there genitalia being tiny, and forced them into a predatory sexual relationship where she violated the boys with a strap-on to feed her woman over man complex, remember she has a husband she can get normal size dick from. Assume these boys were violated in a way you wouldn't want to be violated, and then decide what someone should get for doing that to you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:40 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    15:19 anon is naive. I remember being 12 and knowing right and wrong quite clearly, 10 or below i might agree, 12 no.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:17 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What's the difference between the molestation of females or males? Uh, difference is when a woman molests a boy she's taking the dick! The kid isn't physically harmed as much as becoming possibly traumatised depending on the boy. When a man molests a young girl he is waaaay more likely to inflict harsher trauma upon the girl physically and emotionally.

    Simply put, as a guy I can tell you, I'd rather be penetrating than being penetrated. That's why there's such a major difference between a man molesting a girl and a woman molesting a boy. Different physical attributes.

    As for the sentence it is completely riddiculous to sentence any person to a 60 year sentence when if she would have rather murdered the boys she would only be sentenced to 20 years for murder. What kind of message does that send? Given the choice to molest or murder a criminal would much rather kill rather than spend practically a life sentence for rape.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    12:21 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's a definite deference between 12 y/o boys, and 12 y/o girls when it comes to sex. For one thing, we males are pretty much expected to be predatory and lustful. This extend clear back into our teens (especially these days with the net and such). Obviously there are psych issues that could result from this, but my money is on the boys not regretting this at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:14 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Should it make a difference? Who cares if it was with males or females. Molestation is molestation. I'm more amused that the judge knew the people. Can this truly be impartial? She would probably been found guilty anyways but still.

    Avatar of yuriphoria
    Comment by yuriphoria
    12:57 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While you are right the boys probably don't regret it (except perhaps because they got her jailed, I'd sure feel sorry about her) I don't agree that there is a definitive distinctintions between boys and girl here.

    Firstly, legally, I cannot concent to there being harsher punishment for raping boy than for raping girls.

    Secondly for the sggestion that girls can't be lustful at that age, actually lots of girls lose their virginity at 10-12, most girls that age masturbate and have sexual fantasies, including about older men, including "rape" fantasies. Little girls are nowhere as innocent as their parents wish them to be and consensual sex is not out of the question.

    Consensual meaning willing. The current interpretation is that concent not only involves willingness but maturity age.

    Which leads us to the odd abuntance of preteen girls being accused of C P for photographing themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:52 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, it's bullshit. The mothers are talking about the boys like they're girls losing their hymen and were raped. This shit happened for a year, they loved it, and boys lose nothing by having sex with an older woman, in fact they're going to get complimented all through high school if she was hot. If she were ugly, then the double standard, and by proxy this sentence, makes sense in an odd and incredibly sad way. If a woman wants to fuck a willing pubescent boy (which is to say nearly all the time), all that will happen is he'll have some experience for his girlfriend later.

    Fuck our country.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:52 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not, its downright ridiculous.

    I'd say give her maybe around 15. That seems to be about the length of incarceration for these types of cases.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:11 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, would you be saying the same thing if it was a 33-year old man and two 12-year old lolis?

    Didn't think so, hypocrite.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:19 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Um...a male at twelve does not know what they are doing, not by the least. No way especially with hormones. But ya sucks for the kids. They probably wont regret it now, but ten or so years from now it'll probably hit them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:34 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I would've been all over my 3rd grade teacher assistant...if only I had the chance...

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:54 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol! indeed. but if i were to have sex at 12 with a hot woman, i'm sure i would have not been a regular teenager. so idk.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:16 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    most male pedos don't penetrate they're victims

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:01 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's simple really, without trying to sound sexist, I think you'll find it's much easier for a male pedo to push down a girl and rape her, than it is for a female pedo to push down a guy who in 8/10 wants it more than she does, especially at 12 years old, which is 1, more than enough years to know what you are doing, and by that age most kids these days are much larger in size than they used to be anyway, so yeh i do think a guy raping a little girl can be seen as worse than the visa versa case scenarios (not in all cases) but surely most.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:56 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    youre only saying that cause it didnt happen to you and youre jealous. older women dont prey on young boys, lucky young boys get to have sex with older women.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:50 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're right. It's infuriating. And the judge is jealous too.

    Avatar of OTIKA
    Comment by OTIKA
    13:25 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you're not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:09 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you wont get this for a murder

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:47 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If this were Texas, and you murdered a 12 year old white boy/girl you'd get the death sentence. On the other hand if it were Texas and you murdered a minority (black/hispanic) 12 year old boy/girl you would probably only get 6 month probation.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:51 15/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I lol'd.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:07 07/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just says how fucked up our country is, with all this injustice.

    Avatar of Sylar
    Comment by Sylar
    19:57 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You people are all idiots. We don't know if she forced the boys or not.
    At 11 i wasn't even fapping. I started at 12.
    So how do you know that the boys weren't disgusted by her? She is not even attractive. And even if they started feeling the need for women it doesn't mean they liked her. I was dreaming of sexy young girls when i was 12, not some ugly middle aged woman.
    If the boys wanted it then i agree that she shouldn't be prosecuted like that.
    On the other hand the mothers should stop acting like that because they make the experience even more dramatic for the boys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:41 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you think that a 33 year-old woman is middle aged the you have setious problems.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:27 14/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol you were not faping @ 11? Wow, i was @ 7 or 8, you are weird.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:08 07/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I did at 5. ROFLMAO.

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments