Vaginal Plastic Surgery “Female Circumcision”

ok guys ur right i dont know much and il try to learn but im having my self a sex changeto become a woman
so itll be my very own learning journey so if u can give me any info ill be glad to accept any plase message me at Miss_mystic2000@hotmail.com please ok looking forward with ur nice honest reply thanx

sincerly may

Cool assumptions, bro. Fact of the matter is that nearly all men buy or view porn--and this is the image they overwhelmingly respond to.

The rest of your comment was irrelevant to the subject and full of propaganda.

I am sorry for some spelling faults above.
In short, i am not trying to look like a stud or impress anyone. Far from it.
Instead i wish to say to boys & inexperienced men: Do not believe to urban legends or what stupid, women hating men sprout out from their mouths. Do not believe on bad jokes, but think clearly what is most natural and trustworthy, learn and think of your real experiences, and the most important: LISTEN TO WOMEN AND DISCUSS WITH THEM. They should know their bodies best.
There is no harm to your manliness if you give some credit to women. Even when it comes to sex.

Little problem: usually they are NOT taking advantage of others in the slightest.

The doctor's oath only states that they will tell people the side effects (there are few to none from this procedure) and the benefits (there are many). Then allow the PATIENT to decide if the risks are worth the benefits.

In most, if not all, cases.... the benefits are worth the risks for the patients in their minds.

The doctors are NEUTRAL ARBITERS... they just tell you benefit vs. risk, then allow you to make your own decision based on that... they don't take 'advantage' of anyone, or at least most don't.

You`re spitting lies through your teeth. Are you a cosmetic surgeon yourself? Neutral arbiters? Not taking advantage? They would kill for money if it was not against the law. Go jump to sea or lake, have 100 kg of iron in your pockets.

"person in the position of authority"
"take advantage of others"

Welcome to society!

Pubic hair? But that's not about how it looks, that's about how it feels and gets in the way. Accidental flossing with pubic hair is annoying.

exactly.this guy gets it.

Two words... Pubic hair.

CAN'T UNREAD!!!!

ill say this now - i havent has actual sex before... but from the pron ive seen, i see "whithered" looking pussies like this

http://www.penissizedebate.com/page49b_more_big_pussy_lips.htm

and then there's this kind

http://www.nuhunter.com/images/posts/m/87-perfect-pussy.jpg

and this:

http://www.sweet-nicole.com/may07/mirror/nicole_graves6.jpg

and this:

http://www.thepornmustflow.com/hosted/spunky/cravingcarmen/blackmesh.jpg

the latter few seem to be the blueprint anime tend to use to get the cleaner and easier to draw look that anime likes so much... you can guess which kind i find more appealing. still, its not like that when im with a woman ill ever be staring at her crotch (anime tells me they find that embarrasing LOL), so in the end it matters to me very little. im actually surprised many women care what men think about how they look down there, our eyes arent actually in our dicks obviously. maybe theyre hoping guys would be more likely to go down on them by making it look more inviting? Still, one side they say they hate sluts and what to not look slutty at all, on the other side they think they need to looks and act slutty to be actractive to men by sneaking a pic at their fap material o_O (they should peak at my fap material, id like to see a 3D girl turn herself 2D, like Mr. Game and Watch or something) they hate not only porn stars but even sexy internet/magazine models, yet they love mariah carey and pussycat dolls who basically dress and act like those "sluts" do. paradoxes and hypocracies gallore.

but i really dont think there's enough information out there on how different pussies look and should look, a lot of people just watch porn and make their own assumptions. ill tell you now, i have no idea which kind is fake, which is just worn from too much fucking, which is "untouched", which is just poor surgery...

And so, they called her "Princess meat curtains" no more. The end.

A lot of guys are turned off by labia that large. They know that it is natural, idiots.... they just DO NOT LIKE IT and do not feel that their women should have them like that.

Also, it is not natural to have labia that 'hang down' like 'meat curtains'. I have seen 40 year olds who have had NO surgery, have had sex with oodles of big dicked men, yet don't have that.

It's not natural, it is something make the women's labia overgrow.... maybe the fact that she isn't getting doinked enough.

I've only seen the 'meat curtains' in 'moral' women who don't have sex outside of marriage or women who have had STD's.

"Actually, after giving birth, the vagina never goes back to looking the same. Source: My mother has had 10 kids."

WHY DO YOU KNOW?????

What a idiot you are. Why are there so different noses, mouths, ears, chins, hands, eyes, legs, feet... and so on forever.
Why should a pussy and vagina always look the same on every woman? what right do you have to say that?
I like many kinds of pussies, but i prefer definitely large, long lipped, voluptuous ones. And i think most men( and i man men) do, it`s only shyness and peer pressure what makes them to keep silent instead of admitting it clearly.
I have had my best sex with large pussied girls, and believe me, there has been many! I still love all of them!

"It's not natural, it is something make the women's labia overgrow.... maybe the fact that she isn't getting doinked enough."

Large labias are usually a sign of a lot of estrogen.

And the size of the outer/inner labias has less to do with (normal) sex habits, and a hell of a lot more to do with genes.

Meaning that teenage virgins who never have touched their genitals can have hueg "meat curtains", and that they probably inhereted it from their mothers. Same as with guys: dudes with a fuckton of excessive foreskin often have dads that look the same, and dudes with so little foreskin naturally that they look cut often have dads that look the same.

Genitals are only yet another body part. If a guy has a weird looking natural nose, chances are he got it from one of his parents.

I meant to say in parenthesis: and i mean men.

Any guy that thinks that hasn't had sex. It's not how loose a vagina looks--it's how tight it feels INSIDE that counts.

One is voluntary, the other is not. "fag"

Nothing beat NATURAL VIRGIN VAGINA, tight, soft, warm and juicy!!!!!

Remember, kids, vaginas aren't clown cars.

To everyone that thinks that the vagina cannot be as tight or tighter than it was pre-childbirth after giving birth. I advise you go find out out about the current world's strongest vagina.

For me it's nothing to do with looking like a slut. It's just that "innie" vaginas a more visually appealing than "outie" vaginas. And more pleasant to perform oral sex on.

I think I've missed quite why the medical professionals are so upset. It's only because it's genitalia that they're kicking up so much fuss. It's just removing/trimming excess, unnecessary stuff to make it look nicer. Like shaving, just more permanent and requires surgery.

I like dem cute smooth pussies so I'm all for it.

^ this comment is also somewhat misleading.

The vagina is a muscle, not a shoe. I mean, the skin can stretch to the size needed for a baby, and then shrink back naturally. It's not like they have a bowling-ball sized opening in their pelvis for the rest of their life.

There's a difference between spewing out kids like a Pez dispenser, and keeping in shape.

Plenty of women with 1, 2 3 or even 4 kids who take care of themselves still look and probably feel great..

Don't blame us because your mother's got a vagoo the size of a hallway..

Actually, after giving birth, the vagina never goes back to looking the same. Source: My mother has had 10 kids.

And the reason that men are wanting loli's more and more is because after the age of 25, a lot of women let themselves go if they are married.

I'm not kidding there, my own mother did that (though part of it I have to blame on my father's eating habits and our family having a history of using food to console ourselves).

On the topic of male circumcision: I live in the US. I had an ex that was born in Italy, and he was not circumcised until he was 10 years old, and it was done at that time because his penis had grown so much, so fast, that the foreskin began to "strangle" his penis, and was beginning to cut off circulation. Yes, he was quite well-hung. I had another male friend from the UK that had a similar experience, but he was a few years older when he had to be circumcised. Older male circumcision requires wearing a diaper and bleeding from the penis A LOT for WEEKS. On the other hand, my husband has very little feeling in his penis except for the spot just under the glans, and he was circumcised as an infant. My sister's son had to be re-circumcised TWICE because the doctor apparently didn't circumcise him entirely the first time, and I'm not sure why exactly the second time didn't turn out right. It was very expensive to have corrected, and very painful for the poor little boy when he was between six and eighteen months for all of it.
No matter whether you circumcise or not, there are still chances of problems occurring. There is no right or wrong choice. Until I found that my husband has very little sensitivity, I thought that it was better to inflict the pain when they are young and will not remember it the rest of their lives than risk them having to wear bloody diapers and go through excruciating pain during puberty. The question now is whether possible loss of sensitivity is worth avoiding that.

There is no difference, except these women do it out of free will, where cutting babies is mutilation. Ofc there are medical reasons for circumcision, but they mostly appear in the early teens.

In third-world countries there are benefits of hygiene and STD-prevention as well.

Reread your facts: medical science has proven that there's NO need for circumcision since we have running water and the ability to bathe, not that people do it.
Circumcised men are something like 3 times more likely to get STDs as well, which was a bit of an odd discovery. There's a huge moralfag push to stop the process of male circumcision as well.
Women wanting to look pre-pubescent is due to men wanting lolis more and more. Shaving is just another step on that totem. I suppose we should moralfag to stop female shaving, too?

Let people do what they want with their bodies and stop being a douche.

Nothing personal, bit you're a bit dumb if you can see the difference between an long standing religious tradition for Jewish men and a new cosmetic surgery for women.

"can't" and I fail sigh.

Because male circumcision actually has some damn use.

Most studies have shown that Male Circumcision reduces the chances of catching an STD by somewhere between 30-60% depending on the STD. As well as reducing the chances for urinary track infection in infants.

The reason for this is because the skin on the underside of the foreskin is thinner and more sensitive to outside attack than the rest of the penis.

Of course there are also the cultural reasons as well as hygiene (which is less of an issue in today's first world countries).

While it may cause some minor loss of sensation the glans due to the constant stimulation it receives, it is not enough of an issue to cause one to not under go the procedure.

There are very few risks associated with male circumcision, most of which are infection or scaring, however those are very rare.

---------*
The more you know.

foreskin does give a slightly increased protection against most STD's except for HIV. In case of HIV its the opposite, foreskin give a slightly increased risk of HIV infection. This is due to foreskin functioning like a kind of a buffer against pathogens so the immune system can more easily combat the collected pathogens in the foreskin, but because HIV targets white blood cell directly foreskins are advantages for HIV.
But leaving the foreskin or circumcising is a inadequate measure against STD's anyway so it negates the argument.

[citation needed]

Actually, foreskins protect you from STDs- As long as you actually wash properly.

And no, cutting off the clitoris is like cutting off the head of a penis. it's just mutilation.

Cutting a Child's genitals is mutilation. Having it done of your own volition, as an adult is fine.

And btw, circumcision has little medical function in the modern world. It is purely cosmetic.
It's just as clean unless you're the type that only washed his cock once a week.

Having a foreskin makes you slightly more likely to contract an STD from unprotected sex, but makes no difference if you wear a condom.

But, I will admit that cutting off the clitoris is more severe.

And this isn't full female circumcision. That would be remove the clitoris.

Non-religious circumcision was a medical fad. It was supposedly done to promote cleanliness.

I fortunately missed the fad. My brother was about three or four when the wave hit, and on medical advice, my parents had it done to him.

I remember him screaming and bawling every time he took a piss - shudder. That lasted three or four months.

Years later my mom said that if she'd known it was going to cause such extensive post-surgery pain, she'd never have had it done.

"Trust me, I'm a GOD^H^H^Hdoctor."

If my brother wasn't so good-natured, he'd probably have tracked down that doctor and had a little wager.

"Hey, doc, I'll bet ten bucks you can't put your hands on the bar and keep your mouth closed at the same time."

(Doc puts his hands on the bar, then opens his mouth and screams after an inch-and-a-half diameter piece of steel stock slams down on his knuckles and fingers, breaking many of them.)

"By the way, doc, 'You may experience some mild discomfort'. And you owe me ten bucks."