Comments on: 14-Year-Olds “Most Prolific Rapists”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:35:32 +0000

if 12 year olds want to have sex let them. research even show that 11 or 12 is when most kids lose their virginty to each other

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:41:02 +0000

...what, really?! How is that supposed to make any kind of weird sense?

By: Blue Slime

Blue Slime — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:35:02 +0000

Blame politics for this. I'm sure most of the lawmakers realize something is wrong with this, but one side is too afraid to be seen as encouraging immoral behavior, while the other WANTS it this way so they can bust out a new victim and sympathy ploy to stigmatize their "religious" opponents.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:03:21 +0000

... not really sick weird butt.. that isnt really rapist ppl rape is forcing sex on another and alot of the so call crimes isnt forced if they girls agreed usa and other contries just dont care about some thing sooo simple ill spell it out for you.
the H-E-A-R-T.
girl and guy should make there choice.
....
but what can you say, nothing people do or say wul effect nature.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:56:42 +0000

oks this topic went too the point. usa dosent care on age if your under 18 u have sex u will get in hauled in. nextin my vie girls and guys age should matter to an extent XD. 10 yr old and a 17 yr old is like 10 and 30++... world forget most parents and grandparents married before 20 10-20 was normal and mostly girl were married at 10-14... kids will have sex b/c you say they cant.... its like drinking laws... its useless and cause of the mess...

By: Fenek Alfa

Fenek Alfa — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:46:46 +0000

Nope, but AFAIK this rule is common in EU countries

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:40:28 +0000

Makes one glad to live in a country where two (or more) individuals from the ages of 14-17 can legally have sex.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:33:34 +0000

USA and IRAN are champions at that!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:28:23 +0000

This is complete madness, hysteria bred for financial profits, with the support of politicians thriving on fear, the whole thing reported by media more interested in money than informing or telling the truth.
You have the support of many more people than you think, who can express themselves only on this kind of forum.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:09:28 +0000

I am personally dealing with this with my 14 year old son. That is why this site caught my eye. It has been and will continue to be a nightmare. Playing Doctor with the same group of kids he has been around for years. Penetration was not even in the mix, oral curiosity has given him 4 years probation, hours of community service, some used this as their excuse to break up their families (even though we all new their families were already dysfunctunal) Children made outcasts and labeled, alone, confused and made to feel abandoned by the same children who knowingly participated but saw the fall out and lied to save themselves from the anger of their parents. A court system that has taken advantage financially.... Because they know we will fight for our children. The system is broken and that broken system is breaking our children.
I wonder why its okay for a 60 year old man can hook up with a 19 year old, but a 14 year old is sentenced to a lost childhood if he plays doctor with his his friends that all participated in some form or fashion. Even the parent that brought up the incident in anger at what was discovered can not believe the way it has been handled and once the law had it, they would not let go, they went for blood and when the parent tried to retract it, they threatened to take their kids away from them. It is horrible.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 May 2010 23:22:24 +0000

This is just one of America's horrid laws. Kids are always charged worse than adults. Think about kids who commit or try to commit bank robberies. They can be sentenced to life in prison without parole, yet adults only come close to that if they kill someone.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 May 2010 19:10:47 +0000

Anonymous, you're an idiot.

There is a difference between rape and sex. I would agree that a 35, much less a 25 year old having sex with a 15yr old girl is wrong.

But you're an idiot, with the law and your rules - two 14 year olds having consensual sex *IS NOT RAPE*. Most people become sexually active around 11~12, and being sexually active at 14 is not rare. Just because you never got laid, doesn't mean you have to have a stick up your butt about it.

Also, with the laws being stupid, ie: there ARE stupid laws out there that should be fixed, yes we need laws, etc.

When a 14year old girl takes nude photos of her self with her camera phone and sends it to a few friends. What happens?

Yes, she is charged as a pedophile in the USA for distributing child porn. And the other kids who received those photos, just by looking at them, not knowing what was sent - are registered sex offenders too.

Lets see, yes she shouldn't have done it - but THEY ARE KIDS! They do stupid kid crap and only should be warned not to do that as it could embarrass themselves and attract predators. But to go through trial, jail time and a sex-offender for the rest of their lives? That hurts kids, doesn't help.

That is fucked.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 25 May 2010 17:17:21 +0000

Well, it's the age you feel hornier than any other... Both boys and girls. Problem here is religious fundamentalism or fake moralism. The USA are champions in such things.

Ppl should have sex when they felt like, if they were more honest there would be less frustrated ppl and probably less raping.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 25 May 2010 13:44:08 +0000

i got raped when i was 4
this girl named sarah pulled my pants down
and sucked my peepee, then i stuck my head in her vagina and made a fort in there for a couple of weeks
yeah i know, im da fuckin man

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 22 May 2010 23:19:37 +0000

my bff wants to be raped from head to toe

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:13:41 +0000

Naa, it's okay, it's hotter when it has to be hidden.

By: drunkspiderman667

drunkspiderman667 — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:43:58 +0000

this sickens me.. 14 year olds having sex is natural.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:27:45 +0000

"How do they go to school if they're sex offenders?"

Protip: They can't.

Can't see any of their friends or family that are < 18 as well.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:29:27 +0000

While I believe that teenagers getting involded in sex so early is not precisely desirable (they still don't have the criteria and maturity necessary to act with responsability, so they act mostly on animal instinc, hormones and mediatic pressure), this is absolutely ridiculous. The fact that age makes of the older partner (usually the boy) the rapist, is perhaps the most ridiculous part when everyone know that girls mature physically and mentally faster.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:56:49 +0000

Barbaric.
Nearly have of the 15 year olds in the UK had sex already and I'm suffering from Incel =(

Just grow up! >=0

By: a lolicon

a lolicon — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:37:44 +0000

Based on reason? Praying to the IPU that your uninformed daughter won't have sex doesn't even come close to reasoning. "Let's say you have a 14yo daughter who is sexually active." If I found out that my 14-year-old daughter was sexually active, then I'd make sure that she knew about the possible consequences and that she'd have access to the appropriate contraceptives if she decides to continue. "One day, you find out she is pregnant. 14yos, generally, are dependent on their parents. So,if you are fine with taking care of a child that is unintentionally conceived, then allow her to sleep around at age 14." I'm neither omnipresent nor am I omniscient. If my hypothetical daughter choses to have sex without my knowledge, then there's nothing I can do about it; I won't chain her to her bed or threaten her with various punishments if she doesn't obey me. "As for me, I'd encourage her to wait until she's out of my responsibility." This gives me an "unlike you"-type feeling... Don't get me wrong; I'd warn her about the consequences, but I'm not naive enough to think that she'd be abstinent just because I told her to. Now, I understand why you're shaking in your boots. Sex ed in Sweden is both mandatory and taught throughout the duration of your school years (my generation was, at least). In the U.S. however, sex ed isn't mandatory, it isn't taught nearly as much (if at all), and it might not even be truthful. If I were in your shoes, I WOULD chain my hypothetical daughter to her bed and threaten her with eternal torment if she disobeyed me. Letting an ignorant teenage girl spend time with ignorant teenage boys is just asking for a grandchild... "P.S: Your nick makes you lose some cred in this debate." It's most fortunate that I'm not running for president then, huh?

By: Firetribe

Firetribe — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:08:08 +0000

@ a lolicon

My explanation isn't based on morals, it's based on reason.

Let's say you have a 14yo daughter who is sexually active. One day, you find out she is pregnant. 14yos, generally, are dependent on their parents.So,if you are fine with taking care of a child that is unintentionally conceived,then allow her sleep to around at age 14.
As for me, I'd encourage her to wait until she's out of my responsibility.

P.S: Your nick makes you lose some cred in this debate.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:56:21 +0000

STATUTORY RAPE--- that just meanst they had sex. In this case, females can be the sexual offender just as often as males--- if she is older than the male OR the community, state, or place of offense has a ZERO TOLERANCE policy (ie, two 14 year olds screwing on school grounds after school --- school will see BOTH charged with stat rape).

By: Barbarian of Gor

Barbarian of Gor — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:48:52 +0000

My grandparents were either 14 and 15 or 13 and 17 when they married. This was depression/post depression era and in a rather remote place. Simply put, they weren't on any official "Registers" for a LONG time;-) It was America back then. They both passed away in the 90s. I'm not old myself, they had kids over a long period of time, so I'm a child of the 70s. But in AmeriKKKa some prosecutor would find out and go after them for "Justice by Points". They love 'technicality' crimes. When they are forced to prosecute mafia kingpins, corrupt businessmen, drug traffickers, child sellers...etc. Those guys not only can fight back, they have good lawyers. And too many lost cases lose a good job, sometimes even one big lost case. So they go after cheap "Points" with contempt for the damage they to to people. The "Molester" term has become the modern cry of "Witch!" the unforgivable crime that is so vile that if anyone even argues the accused's innocence they are considered guilty of it too. If they'd lived till today, some Prosecutor would look over records (yes, they were eventually on the system) and go after them. Two "Serial child molesters" plus lots of money and property to seize for the state. Easy points. This is AmeriKKKa.