dragon-ball-raging-blast-xbox-360.png

The latest Dragon Ball video game, Spike’s Dragon Ball Raging Blast, is set for a multiplatform PS3 and Xbox 360 release on November 12th in Japan.

Observers have been quick to note some significant graphical differences between the two versions…

The comparison PNGs:

PS3:

dragon-ball-raging-blast-ps3.png

Xbox 360:

dragon-ball-raging-blast-xbox-360.png

It looks as if the blast will not be the only thing raging about this.

The game itself is available for pre-order now.



    Post Comment »
    129 Comments
    Comment by SnooSnoo
    19:08 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There are three more strands of hair on his front left bang in the XBOX 360 version?

    Comment by Rokudaime
    07:56 26/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    I see no difference, and even if I did, I don't care. DB sucks. In fact, it's one of the most sucky franchises out there. I don't get how anyone can like it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:13 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    no look the background has a few more rocks to blow up... and the 360 version has 100+ more hours of charging times before attacks...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:33 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you fucking blind or something and DB does not "suck". I bet you're one of those sailormoon fanboys who crossdress as one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:04 26/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    Dragonball is, from what little experience I have with the franchise, fairly generic shonen anime. I will admit that it's fairly generic because everyone else started ripping it off, however.

    That said, every shonen anime that isn't Yakitate!! Japan fails.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:04 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yakitate!! Japan is amazing, but that in itself is a parody oriented series, ripping off of animes that the directors liked, most of which are shonen. Fist of the North Star (Yes, it IS Shonen) is one of them and there are very few people who could ever give enough good reason to even slightly dislike Fist of the North.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:39 27/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    Indeed Fist of the North Star is far superior to dragonball or any other bullshit shonen ( e.g Bleach, Naruto, One Piece) in both action and story.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:08 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Eh, I haven't seen Fist of the North Star, so Yakitate!! Japan still stands as my favorite, partially because it's a parody. Series really went downhill after the Pierrot arc, though. I think I'm mostly pissed about the most badass character, Kawachi, getting demoted to Butt Monkey.

    Comment by RicharDteKing
    19:16 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i don t really see much diference between those 2 pictures

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:17 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the ps3 version has a more grey-blue and its missing a few rock chunks....ever played spot the difference?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:21 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 POWER!

    Comment by k
    22:18 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol ps3 got longer speech...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:09 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, that was the victory-pose, the rocks were destroyed in the PS3-Version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:49 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Exactly, rock are destroyable, here's another cap on the PS3 for the xbots:

    http://www.dotup.org/uploda/www.dotup.org300824.bmp

    PS3 is supposed to have higher resolution according to the source of the original article at Hatimaki.

    Comment by Csalbertcs
    01:22 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yea, the game does have destructible environments just not too many.

    And the destroyed rocks re-appear for cutscenes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:05 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Xbox gets an extra rock
    xbox 1 - ps3 0
    WIN

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:33 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, all the rocks are in place in the PS3 version if you don't destroy them. Same as the 360's rock count. Plus PS3 version has better anti aliasing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:11 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Seriously, which crappy looking Dragonball looks SLIGHTLY better on which console? Get a life...

    Comment by First Posting Idiot
    00:23 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Besides the missing rock in the background, I can't see any significant difference. Certainly not anything that would keep a person from buying it if they wanted to.

    Comment by Schrobby
    08:47 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 has less details because it can't compute as many polygons as Xbox...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:20 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anti-aliasing, a couple extra rocks here and there. 360 one is better on a level so minuscule that it'd only serve as fodder for console fags to war with.

    Comment by Ninsheart
    20:09 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah, right! Someone really needs to explain to me what anti-aliasing means. I've seen that term so often, yet I still don't know what it means.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    simply put, it's a technology used to make the edges of a picture smoother.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:25 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It has to do with signal processing. When sampling points in a analog signal, you need enough points to derive the original frequency. The theorem of Shannon states that you need at least twice the maximum frequency you wish to detect. Otherwise you get residual frequences that do not exist in the original signal. That effect is called aliasing.

    What this has to do with games is that using anti-aliasing you can smooth out the pixels, so instead of rising blocks you get a line.

    Comment by CJLopez
    01:54 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    thats a victory pose, hence the end of the battle. so the rock that are missing on the ps3 version must have been destroyed in the battle.

    yes, the whole enviroment of the maps is destroyable

    Comment by Y10NRDY
    03:12 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Anon 20:22 & 20:25 - thx for the explanation on anti-aliasing. i, too, have long heard the term without understanding the meaning.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:14 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They both seem to have crap Anti-Aliasing jaggies everywhere.

    The xBox360 version seems to have much better LOD (Level of Detail - basically using different sized textures based on the distance from the viewer)and anisotropic filtering (averaging the LOD frequency to fill in the gaps between the data). Look at the bushes and trees to the right behind the character.

    Comment by Ninsheart
    06:57 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah, great! That's an amazing explanation on anti-aliasing. Anon :25's explanation was so detailed I was having a hard time understanding it, but after reading it 3 times I understood everything. XD thanks so much!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:20 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Pic for Xbox 360 is more "anti-aliasing" than PS3

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:20 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How about the rock that has disappeared in the top left?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:30 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    and the one thats right behind his head.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:10 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Destructible environment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:21 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    check out the outlines

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:22 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A couple more mountains... but could be a change of camera, or because they are randomly generated...

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:57 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is actually what it is, that level has different rocks everytime you play

    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    22:17 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But we can still assume rocks spawn more often on XboX than PS3 just by looking at these images no?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:50 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Go play the demo, the rocks get destroyed during gameplay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:34 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the difference is in the dialog. and also the rock

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:35 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL! You're an idiot. Opening/victory taunts are always chosen randomly. The dialogue's the same in both versions.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:42 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If he was being sarcastic, then that would make you the idiot for not getting the sarcasm.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:47 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    haha seconds guys right

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:40 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The X-Box version has more geometry in it. Two of the rock pillars are missing in the PS3 version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:16 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    in all of 360/PS3 comparisons. The 360 version seems to have more "add-on"s (eg. extra rocks). why is that?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:23 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    theres a ROCK MISSING

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:29 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OH SHIT!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:56 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    RUUUUUUUN!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    bad game is bad

    Comment by Eric Cartman
    03:54 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    real games

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:19 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 looks sharper compared to 360. 360 seems to be alot more blured

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:22 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yea thats what i thought too

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:27 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Blurring is caused by a smoothing filter, a form of anti-aliasing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah the worth type of anti-anliasing that is possible... blurring. Real antialiasing uses super-sampling on the edges of the polygons, but I've never seen that in any console game.

    (PC ftw :P)

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:22 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As far as I can see the 360 version just has some blur to cover the Aliased lines where as the ps3 version doesn't.

    Don't think it's a big deal, I'd play either version, I'm not one of these new breeds that get all OCD over HD.

    Comment by RicharDteKing
    19:25 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You said it dude. i m not really care which versions to play because, for ma eyes they are almost the same as far the only thing i spoted of diference was 1 rock and nothing more o_o

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:23 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 is darker? which from Bayonetta point of view darker = better graphics apparantly?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:25 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not just Bayonetta, Resident Evil 5 as well. Its darkness vs washed out grey. Of course, I know some people that pump their brightness and contrast up so that there is no black, only grey, but that drives me mad... mad I tell you!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:30 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    who cares!
    tried demo it sucks...

    Comment by Poyo The Great
    19:32 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Xbox 360 better?

    Comment by Tateha
    19:43 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    xbox 360 has got anti-aliasing, where as the ps3 has a lack thereof. if the ps3 is like seriously lacking these nice rocks and mountains, then some shit is gonna fly. probably developed first on the 360 then tried to port to ps3 with fail results. can't blame the system, just the lazy developers.

    Comment by chronomaster
    20:18 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not really (decent) AA. It looks more like a blur filter was put on, post processing.

    I prefer the PS3 version if that kind of stuff is forced.

    Comment by chronomaster
    20:21 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To extend: On far away objects, it looks fine. A depth-of-field filter would have looked just lovely. Filtering the entire image like this, however, makes the lines look uneven and clumpy in places.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:24 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's not a blur filter, that is 2x FSAA.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:57 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol. Try enabling 2x FSAA in a game on your PC. You will see that it looks much better than this "anti-aliasing" filter...

    Comment by Riiku
    19:44 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whaaat? They REMOVED some rocks from the field? NO WAY. There's NO excuse for this whatsoever!! *sarcasm*

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:57 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    AHAHA. Artefact, you win. Reading these comments are the true meat of your article. XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:57 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is only one rock difference since the one behind Goku on the 360 one is just replaced by one further back on the PS3. The PS3 has a better looking sky also.

    Comment by hALOTOO
    20:06 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OMG who stole the rock from PS3 version ??

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:43 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Microsoft with their greedy hands

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:34 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I lol'd

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:12 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    .....really....the dialog is the big thing. Its a pretty big difference compared to the ps3. 360 version=americanized over masculine crap. A typical blunder the us makes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:25 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you being serious? Each quote exists in both versions.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:29 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 version looks a bit better but the gameplay is what really matters.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:55 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I totally agree with you.

    Comment by Sylar
    20:32 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The game has horrible graphics in both consoles anyway.
    Just look at the character.
    It's kind of disappointing because with the power this consoles have they could have made it look like the anime but they are just pleased to stick to N64 graphics.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:33 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The PS3 version has deeper colors, but Goku's "forehair" seems to be somewhat rough and there are boulders missing..

    They just lost a buyer.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:36 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    here we go with this again....you know what I think I'm going to make a multiplatform fps, its going to be called "my dick" and I want every one's opinion's on what console it looks better for.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:53 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No rock for you, Psfags

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:52 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey xbot did u try out the game you dumb fuck?
    PS3 screen cap w/ the rocks not destroyed during game play:
    http://www.dotup.org/uploda/www.dotup.org300824.bmp

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:59 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    learn2link

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:02 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 version is clearly superior.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:18 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what a boring game... just looks and feels like al the past ps2 dragon ball games.... even the animation is the same XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:26 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, I can see how this game needs a -graphical- comparison.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:28 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's more than just a rock and some jaggies, gentlemen.

    The color range is much greater on the 360 version, anti-aliasing is higher, and it seems they were also able to add in more terrain to the 360 version.

    I'm a big PS3fag so I'm used to this kind of treatment. I just hope people will fucking start developing multiplats on the PS3 first instead of the 360.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:55 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Demoed it and wasn't impressed deleted it after 2 matches so at this point it doesn't matter to me which is better it's just a polished turd on whichever is better shit will always = shit

    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    22:04 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Either or, it doesn't make much of a difference on this game since the "texture" detail is kinda anime to start with.

    Though it does seem to show that the battle fought on the PS3 was far more messy. The sierra club are probably shiting tofu bricks over all the land destroyed in that pic.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:10 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    theres a stone or two missing from the ps3 frame?! the shock! the horror!

    Comment by HyperKnuckles99
    22:19 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This post is going to have 300 comments in no time.

    Comment by MaidNiac
    22:21 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OMG! Goku speaks less in Xbox360..

    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    22:23 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep, just finished the demo, and what I saw as the winner is the background shown on the 360. Which again tells me that the battle on the PS3 was far more destructive than the limp battle fought on the 360...

    Though of course I did as good as the 360 player to end up with the "pristine" victory pose. I'm Not much of a fighting fool who knows all them fancy punch 'em moves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:25 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i'm all for ps3
    but this game is stupid waste of money

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:28 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what's the difference???

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:56 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Xbox's is not anti-aliased but actually at a lower resolution then the PS3's, look properly at the "blur" jaggies.

    not picking any sides here, just saying.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:04 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you count the aliasing lines on some sharp edge (like the black line on his arm), you'll see that there is the same number of pixels in both versions. So the resolution is the same, it's just somewhat blurred in the Xbox 360.
    Actually it looks like the pic is moved by 0.5 pixel in both directions, averaging the values of neighbor pixels.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    23:00 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360's Gokuu: "Don't bother. It's over." PS3 is finished.

    Lol sorry, I just had to do that lame joke.

    Yeah, missing rock and lack of filtering on PS3. Don't see much beyond that, we need all that technical scribble of DF over the pics to actually know about their respective native resolutions and whatnot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:00 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 sucks anyway.Why bother? why pose thread about gay box anyway? shama... FFXIII need 3 disc BOOOHHHHHH SUCK MAN

    Comment by EvilTradingCards
    23:29 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Does the 360 suck? If it sucks then how come it has sold so well? But does that mean the people who bought one suck as well? I'm pretty sure I don't suck and I bought one...or does the fact that I own a Wii and PS3 counteract the suckage?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:33 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    1/10

    Comment by ScarredBushido
    23:56 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh no xbox 360 has a extra rock FUCK must be HEAPSSSS better then ps3 lmfao

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:04 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's sarcasm. Wow, guys....

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:22 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=659769148

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:33 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Game sucks on both consoles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:33 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It actually looks like the 360 version is upscaled rather than having anti-aliasing

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:10 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can't really count the backgrtound rocks since they are destroyable, and could have well been done so during the gameplay seqeuence before that screen was taken.
    The main difference here is that the 360 version uses anti-aliasing while the PS3 version doesn't, making it look really jagged, which is even more noticable in games like this that use cel-shaded graphics technology.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:59 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sankaku fags like you all suck

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:22 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    0/10. Too obvious, troll.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:28 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Better anti-aliasing in the 360 version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:35 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You have a choice between sharp jagged edges and blurry jagged edges.

    Comment by Eric Cartman
    03:56 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    XBOX!
    better

    Comment by Eric Cartman
    04:01 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    haha

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:21 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The rock isn't missing in the PS3 picture. It was destroyed. If you've ever played the Budokai Tenkaichi (Sparking) games before, you know the environment can be destroyed.

    Also, the difference between the two is entirely miniscule. I really don't notice anything.

    I'm getting the 360 version, because that's the one the GameStop guy asked me about. If that doesn't work, I'll get the PS3 version and see how it holds up.

    Lastly, if the gameplay is good, than that's what really matters. Maybe it'll keep me off of Super Dragonball Z.

    Mysterious Voice: "So you'd prefer 3 characters with 130 skins over truly unique characters? Nothing should keep you off of Super Dragonball Z."

    That's a low blow, Mysterious Voice...

    Mysterious Voice: "My specialty."

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:13 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I remember hearing the Ghostbusters devs saying if the game was exclusive to PS3 there would be more crap flying around, I am often confused to why multiconsole PS3 games have less crap in the background.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:59 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    IMO PS3 fails for having less colour saturation. I like vivid colours.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:07 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is a DBZ game, who cares....

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:52 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol at these 360 vs PS3 threads... so many fanbois get their knickers in a knot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:30 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well Artefact always posts these PS3 vs Xbox360 articles in the first place.

    Comment by chad001
    08:09 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So Ps3 had more detail in terms of sky, and 360 tried to make up for it with rocks?

    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    08:16 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The 360 version is more sharp, but the sky detail is better on the PS3 version. Not much of a difference though.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:18 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can't we all just agree that multiplat games suck at PS3, 'coz devs are too lazy to reprogramming everything for the PS3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:36 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is a stupid article. It just seems like bait to start another fanboy flame war. Do really need so many of these console flamebait aricles?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:51 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    it brings more traffic to the site?

    dunno if it's wise to increase hits at the cost of more infantile cretins obsessing over if their expensive toys are better than the "other" expensive toy

    Comment by Kyo
    11:05 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's differences? In the text yeah, but other than that...
    Who cares anyway. These DBZ games are fun for like, 10 minutes and then get really old. :/

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:24 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I bet Dragonball Evolution's game on the XBOX360 will be super awsome too. Justin Chatwin is hawt

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:46 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 has higher contrast, but that's just a TV setting so it doesn't matter which console.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:31 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh my dog they have more rocks

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:26 26/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Tenkaichi style games suck anyway so who cares

    Comment by Vetus
    10:49 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whatever. It's just another Dragonball fighting, same things as always. I prefer playing Dragonball - Revenge of King Piccolo at Wii.

    Comment by Gilley234
    19:25 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's very clear, people, that the rocks in the background were previously destroyed before the screenshot was taken. The playstation 3 has deeper black tones, and much more vibrant color. the average gamer wouldn't notice the difference but if you're OCD like me, you definitely will be able to tell.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:05 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    well kinda stopped caring about dragon ball ever since they put reruns of it for about 2 years from dragonball to dragonball gt, you'll just tired of it

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:52 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they are the same thing but PS3 version is better.

    why?
    because it doesn't have stupid blurr to cover up the jaggy edges. Sharpness is good!

    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Forum Posts

Recent Comments