Comments on: Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: “What Has He Done?”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:12:28 +0000

Almost looks pantless, up to his balls in corexit foam? I'd frame the upper half though, they should have made him walk on water instead.

Couldn't he remove the TSA (not visiting ever already, x2, with the TSA and seeing what happened to the Indian Ambassador) and those 1000+ military bases, of which 38 are in Japan?

US isn't very attractive or safe or goodly anymore. Just another 2nd world country.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 01:17:30 +0000

Well it's not Obama's fault for receiving a Nobel Prize... Than why are you guys tormenting Obama for getting one and stating that he has done nothing?? I mean, as I'm not a American, I wouldn't understand that much politics in America but it's just too damn sad to see one country not supporting one's leader "because he has done nothing" -_-;;

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:27:23 +0000

Every third peace prize is bullshit.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:27:17 +0000

Every third peace price is bullshit.

By: BloodThirstyNogitsune

BloodThirstyNogitsune — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:27:26 +0000

well he hasn't exactly been 'throwing more oil on the fire' when comes to war now has he?

By: Sevodax

Sevodax — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:22:42 +0000

I want one too ( >_>)...soo gimme! >_<

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:32:16 +0000

Wow some people's children! I still hear everyone saying Obama is spending billions, trillions in health care.
Where were you dumbasses when bush was sending billions to Iraq? Blank check signings so the sky is the limit. Sure it was stopped and so was our internal state structural funding. But we could build schools and hospitals for insurgents to practice on or give Al-Qaeda some thing to do. Where was all your bitching at then? we could have used that here in the states. Where are the excuses now?

Republican = Buttsex no indicators no warning until too late. Selling you the no buttsex speach but doing it anyway.
Democrats = Buttsex and atleast they yell Suprise! And say it to your face.

Plus
our economy was great in the clinton years unless you were super wealthy. (Incert babycry here)
9-11 happend so spend spend spend thoes hard earned dollars!!! This way terror does not win since they were trying to cripple us that way anyway.
Wait out economy became shitty anyway, more rich, more poor people. Interesting how we won this one?

By: Kazu_Akuma

Kazu_Akuma — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:01:27 +0000

Perhaps the the Nobel Prize committee thought that if America was able to elect Obama as president then maybe world peace doesn't seem like some far-off fantasy anymore. Perhaps Obama is the greatest force for the miraculous occurrence of peace in the world by VIRTUE of his very election! lol.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:18:09 +0000

'BALROG OH BOMBER'

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:56:24 +0000

probably they ran out of candidates and they thought who is the most popular guy > Obama < then give him the noob prize for reading from a teleprompter.
PS: Obama is actually Bush in disguise.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:51:06 +0000

Its quite funny actually, the other day I was driving and about two blocks of people where protesting obama and years earlier only about a handful protested bush...lets get this right, BUSH was the one to fuck every thing up, and things arnt gona start changing overnight dipshits

I give Obama some kodos for having the balls to take this job...i agree he didn't deserve the peace prize, until some things he said followed through. I wont judge him till the end of the four years.

IRAQ is a shitthole, we all admit that much...americans should leave the damn place alone...

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:47:47 +0000

The prize is really for the American people for not electing a total fucking failure this time.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:37:57 +0000

Obama sucks too liberal fag. No one cares for your useless hollow bipartisanship.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:37:02 +0000

I would of liked to have the olympics, but Obama winning over people who justly deserved the award is bullshit and you know it man.

By: hALOTOO

hALOTOO — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:54:21 +0000

Bush should get a Noble prize since he did such a BANGup job

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:54:04 +0000

If he could count past ten without taking his shoes off, he would have gotten the prize for Mathematics, too.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:05:30 +0000

I think this is a form of reverse psychology: now that he's got THIS much support, he's might start doing some work for a change.

Then again, what do I know. I'm a leprachaun.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:20:44 +0000

not very justified to say that one must support the deed of fellow countrymen. Especially if it was so...FUCKED UP

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:18:56 +0000

hey that goes for you too...??

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:16:12 +0000

great spelling

allowed*

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:48:06 +0000

If the guy in control of the biggest arsenal in the world wins Nobel peace prize, next year's Nobel science prize will be for an Amish.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:55:33 +0000

The REALITY is that we started a pointless war in Iraq. What does taking over a tiny nation that didn't have any WMD's have anything to do with "having a job" or "not being attacked?" If anything, it has the reverse effect. I'll admit, we need to stop focusing on healthcare and look more at the economy first, but globalisation is happening right now as we speak, we can't keep being the bully on the playground and expect to get away with it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:52:02 +0000

Torture and the Iraq war weren't things that Bush "needed to continue." They were MISTAKES that he and his administration STARTED. The fuck man, you think a war like that can be ended right off the bat? Sure, if we want to happen in Iraq what happened in Afghanistan in the 80's, be my guest, we're just setting ourselves up for another Taliban.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:46:27 +0000

Well, I will at least give that you're very upfront and honest in how you see the politics of some of the things that have happened, and I agree to most of the points and concerns you have listed above. It is troublesome, though, that most people in the US do not at all seem to take the time to think through the reasoning of such things - admittedly you must say you are also a special case, in that most US citizens have NOT traveled the world and yet many of said are ready to condemn it. And also despite your reasoning, it still does not justify the actions that the US has taken in many cases. Fundamentally there is a "right" thing to do, and I would guess that the US being such a moral nation would understand this. Iraq is a mistake and should be apologized for. If we want to accomplish things in the middle east there is a right way of doing it and a wrong way. There are many paths to reach the goal, and sometimes you have to choose between what's easy and what's right, and the US does not always choose the latter unless it's what's "right" for the US.