Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 PS3 vs Xbox 360: Night & Day?

ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-013.jpg

ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-014.jpg

Another comparison of Tecmo’s oppai physics simulator Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 reveals what many are hailing as the apparent complete graphical superiority of the PS3 version to the Xbox 360 version, already scrutinised in some detail previously.

Xbox 360 images above, PS3 images below:

ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-001.jpg

ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-002.jpg

ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-003.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-004.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-005.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-006.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-007.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-008.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-009.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-010.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-011.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-012.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-015.jpg
ninja-gaiden-ps3-xbox360-comparison-016.jpg

The game itself is due October.

Via Hachimaki.

Possibly the Greek lettering was omitted for good reason from the Xbox 360 version’s title…



    Post Comment »
    269 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    06:39 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    maybe ill have a use for shitty ps3 now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:32 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Will it be any more fun?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:18 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Please remember that the 360 version of the game was also made by the Team Ninja that was refused wages and bonuses that they were promised by the management. They also had to rush the game cause MGS is a collection of douchebags that want a game to meet IT'S deadline.
    Oh and both the 360 and PS3 suck because their respective manufacturers are full of shit.
    MS steals from the consumer, Sony steals from the developers.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    06:43 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Now that was a harsh statement, but I agree with you Anon.

    Just to avoid confusion, "MGS" stands for "Microsoft Game Studios" here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:17 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Guys, Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 is a over one year port. It's OBVIOUS that Koei Tecmo made some improvement on the graphical side of the game, isn'it? Otherwise, it would have been a fucking shitty port. :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:20 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh, please cry louder. I can't hear you over the sound of how much more awesome my version of Ninja Gaiden is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wait, you actually bought a PS3? HAHAHA! What a idiot!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:41 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uh? I fell in love with Valkyria Chronicles, so I thought "Why not?"! D,:

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Erhh...I own both system, I have completed Ninja Gaiden 2 @Master Ninja difficulty on 360(I have a 1150 on 1250) and I'll buy the ps3 version too for the enhancements. :P
    Be less fanboy, play more.

    Comment by Y10NRDY
    07:23 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ok ok we get it.

    /thread

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:21 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Omg guys you wouldn't believe what happened to me!

    I was always jealous of people who got into betas early ..but then came my chance! I bought xbax console yay!

    So then i was beta testing the xbax version (the one with multiple dvd swapping feature and censored oppai)

    some minutes passed when i began to get tired of swapping dvd's just to load the next area, then suddenly! xbax went into rrod mode oh-shi! (hidden feature) then blew up next to my curtains and caught fire!

    btw i'm posting from heaven cos i died in fire.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:13 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They both looks terrible but each for their own reasons.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:29 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they removed best parts of gmae though new game plus and the stair case of death where there is so many enemys that it lags

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:40 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Better or worse, I'm not paying full price ($59.99) for a remake! I already played it on 360. I'll maybe buy it for the PS3 when its $20 dollars.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:09 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damn as soon as Xbox360 fans find out what the difference is between their system and the PS3 they start coming up all kinds of excuses. Seriously face the fact that you are in the 90s baby, your still using DVDs. Everyone else is moving onto the HD era. They still can't figure out why their graphics resolution is so small: DVD 9GB, Bluray 60GB. No rocket science or college education required. You can put up to 10x the content and MORE if you double layer the bluray.

    Comment by Rinfinite
    04:24 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Resolution? Ghost Busters? ToV?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:11 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    fuck ryu, ryu is boring and gay and also has a penis

    ayane should be the main character in ninja gaiden

    also, during the game she should be raped and sodomized by evil ninja's for our pleasure, far more interesting then tit bouncing.

    Implement these changes and NG will be over 9000 times better

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:59 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agree 100 percent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:26 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 FTW!!! 360 got pawned very hard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:59 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Without the gore, the 360 version is still the better version. There's just something so satisfying about cutting the enemies to pieces and watching the blood spray everywhere. That feeling is completely missing from the ps3 version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    04:31 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dont foget ps3 coudnt handle blood becuase of its lower ram poor ps3 fags

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:03 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The PS3 version has blood, there's just less of it. Go find another stupid excuse to hate on a console. Either way I don't care since I won't be getting this game.

    Comment by tingle
    05:05 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I hate to point this out because it will make me look like a total xbro fanboi.

    The PS3 version had a lot more development time with a finished game with months of nothing to do but polish it.

    Much like how Resident Evil 2 looked far superior on N64 then PS1.

    Some say DOA 2 hardcore looked better on PS2 then DOA2 on Dreamcast, which is true except for jaggys and resolution. However what they fail to note is DOA2 hardcore WAS released for Dreamcast in Japan where the DC version was clearly superior to the PS2. The difference? almost a year of polishing an already great game.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    06:40 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can't see how that'd make you look like a fanboy in the eyes of non-retarded human beings, tingle. You are stating facts and logically tying 'em up.

    If I had an example of a PlayStation 3 game that got a Xbox 360 port later on after the PS3 version's release, I'd point out the exact same thing.

    Maybe we'll have to wait for Cross Edge Dash, but that one already looked like a PS2 game running at high definition on the PS3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lazy developers are lazy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:16 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You mean "incompetent", surely.
    Team ninja is one of the worst developping team ever.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:49 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Now if I could just get my PS3 fixed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:52 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Surely that Xbox360 is capable and should have the same graphic as PS3 and even better.
    It's obvious that tecmo seems doesn't give a shit about xbox360 like: "You know what? we want PS3 to be superior to xbox360, so I'm sorry microsoft."
    Can't you see what Namco Bandai have promoted PS3 with their new and better Tales of Vesperia? Who would prefer to get better graphics over having more contents?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:08 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 apparently since they get better graphics and more content just for being patient and not buying the first thing shoved down their throat.

    You would realize this if you weren't a mindless consumer that can't see that one console is not better than the other. Both consoles have their advantages and disadvantages. If you were a real gamer you would appreciate both consoles but instead you are just a pathetic fanboy who can't stop and think for a minute what is most beneficial to the market.

    Have fun sucking Bill Gates' dick which is coincidentally the smartest thing to come out of your mouth.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:52 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Being a real gamer doesn't mean you would appreciate everything. That is just a matter of opinion.
    To me, I like ps3 more than xbox but not because of the quality, it is the games that appeal me.
    There are no other games I would want to play on xbox since most of them are multiplatform like fallout 3.
    Fanboy or not, we are all here to discuss how we feel after all. =]

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:49 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Meh. I still prefer the 360 over the PS3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:03 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i'm tried with these kind of article...hoaaam.... boring...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:33 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    team ninja started working on both versions of the game at the same freggin time. they even split up the dev. teams and pulled some help from their euro studio for the ps3 ver.as you can see they spent more time on the sony version because the sdk was more versatile and easier to work with. i have a nice pc rig, an xbox, wii, and a ps3. they all have their pros and cons. but honestly i enjoy the consistancy of consoles over p.c. with effin computers you have to constantly UPGRADE them which costs ALOT more money than buying a new console every 5-8 years(said with the understanding that the console wont shit out on you every 8-12 months{XBOX360}). technically pcs have more opportunities to be more powerful(costs lots of$$$$$$) but out of the current consoles i would have to go with the ps3 then the wii then the 360. by the way halo is wayyyyyyy wayyyy over-rated. and all you faggy fanboys are faggidy fag fag freakin flamer assed fanboys. why cant we all just join together and say that video games are the greatest instead of bitchin like a cow on the rag... my console is better than yours fuckin chumps grow th fuck up bitch ass complainers

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:19 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But what happens to the franchise? I'd heard the director of Ninja Gaiden was in trouble and the developer tanked or something.
    That would mean no more DOA or ninja gaiden for either system for a long time.
    Say it ain't so.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:29 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    its obvious the ps3 version had to be better, the 360 version is much older, the only thing i didnt like on the ps3 version, is the lack of gore, why did they take it out?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:59 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You guys seriously wana compare two pictures of Xbox360 to many pictures from the PS3? don't make me laugh guys, the whole subject is to make PS3 look cooler, this site only shows one side, which is PS3, PS3 fanboys AND Xbox360 fanboys are stupid, I have both systems, I enjoy Xbox360 more than PS3 I admit, but that doesn't make PS3 a bad console, I like both of them, though Xbox360 has more games that I like.. Gears of war,Halo and such.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:41 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL . X360 has more real lighting and more natural materials . PS3 is sa unreal and all the materials looks like plastic or wet poop .

    Someonse tells that the shadows in night need more computing power in this game... LOL ;] . The light are precomputed ,baked ligtmaps and there's no diffrence for a hardware if there will be a day ,night or other shit ;] .

    Sorry for my engrish ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:37 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Guys, it is clearly a win for the Station. BUT! It is a 1 year difference and I'd say the graphics on the 360 were under-achieving at the time (not because of the console, but of the developers)

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:21 06/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 is superior? I dont see it.

    From those screens the 360 has better graphics processing from long distances where lots of detail is not needed or used but close up the details suck compared to the ps3 screens.

    The 360 streets look flat and bland while the ps3 streets use normal mapping and have more detail to them.

    Also the 360 renders the water horribly while the ps3 does an excellent job.

    Again, PS3 screens are on the BOTTOM and 360 are on TOP.

    Based on these screens anyone that says the 360 is better then the ps3 needs to get some fucking glasses and look again at the ground details in the second set of screen shots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:09 27/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    who want to suppose to see the difference if the screenshot of xbox360 are during the day and the ps3 in the night?!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:21 21/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is the welcome page for the dietguidance.us Association web site.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:00 16/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Both images suck
    all the 360 pics look flat
    and the ps3 looks like someone had a fricken field day with the normal maps

    so they both look horrible
    anyone that says one looks better is a fan boy
    and anyone that complains that one sucks worse owns the system and wishes they had the other

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:38 28/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    only reason to buy XBOX here = Cheap Games

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:40 09/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ps3 version supposed to look better. its a year improved from the original.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:05 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    let's see.

    the programmer fails hard in bump mapping with XBOX and fails harder with unnecessary glare in PS3.

    now, where's teh PC version?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:21 30/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Congrats!!!! The ps3 is the better system now because of this. Thanks sankaku!

    Comment by Ryuw
    03:14 30/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But more importantly: GORE FUCKING WHERE???!!!

    TEAM NINJA, I AM DISAPPOINT.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:11 30/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Eh, based on those shots, I think both versions are about equal for different reasons. The 360 shot looks more realistic, whereas the PS3 shot looks more technically impressive.

    More important factors would be load times and framerate/slowdown/tearing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:35 30/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I really dont give a shit :D Looks like crap game anyways

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:10 01/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Bargain bin purchase for me

    Comment by GHS
    12:56 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Seems like people have finally officially seperated themselves into the PCfags and Consolefags clans. And then of course there's that eternal, internal strife in the Consolefag clan between the Xboxfags party and the PS3fags party. Reminds me of real governments too much I have to say.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:35 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Development time between releases, coupled with a little console bias on the devs' part would explain things... or the less-confrontational angle, of the 360 version being pushed out of the door prematurely, whilst the PS3 gets a bit more t.l.c.

    Regardless, this series of Sigma 2 comparisions are utterly moot. Anything more than a month between releases and some differences are to be expected. As stated earlier, let's see Bayonetta, or any other game that's simultaneously released on both consoles, face off before PS3 owners start pounding their chest like mindless apes. :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    13:56 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I always wonder if we are just being played and the PS3 pics are the ones actually on top? Also doesn't anybody here find it hilarious that everybody keeps blaming Artefact for this article but the Author tag line reads Leon? PC graphics are still far and away way better but when consoles get better games and the PC's latest offering has been a MMORPG I'm just bound to get a console eventually. Anyone one here know which one is better?aafr

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:18 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Do graphics really make all the difference? I've played both versions, and while the new characters are nice, you barely even get to pay as them. Other than a new coat of paint, the core gameplay is identical, save for a few minor camera differences and enemy setup. Besides, this game was mediocre to begin with. Go play God of War 1 and 2 for the best action experiences ever, with Devil May cry 3 a distant second. They might not look as pretty, but the gameplay (what actually matters) delivers on levels miles above these games.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:19 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes, we all play games to stare at the floor tile

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:51 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    also tons of weapons missing in ps2 one like the spear gun and the windmill.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    09:27 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    all i see is the superiority of blue ray over normal dvd

    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    10:06 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh beta testers... i mean 360 people :p

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:15 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    360 user are faggots thx

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:33 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think that sony users are just crying babies when their exlusives were rellesed on x360 ;] .

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:07 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course the PS3 version looks better. They've had an extra year to tweak it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    14:29 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    they are redoing god of war 1&2 and putting it on the PS3

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:30 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't know why people are comparing a SNES to Wii...? They came our different times and of course the newer game would be improved upon. @~@

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:59 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anonymity*
    1. gives retards courage around the net.
    2. damn sorry excuse to be a man

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:14 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow i must say that is quite on spot

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:43 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dang...PS3 Blew Xbox graphics away, Xbox is so flat...no depth at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:08 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    screw that, just you guys wait till they decided to put this bitch on wii!

    ull be cryin' your little asses off!!

    *sets fishing rod*

    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    18:29 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The difference is really huge here. Well considering it's already been a year since the game is launched i thought the graphics will be the same or something.

    Looks like the developers work really hard to make the difference. And game review sites saying that the difference is not huge, yeah right if you're telling me that graphics difference is not huge you will obviously need some glasses >_>

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:01 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can bet I'm still gonna prefer the Ninja Gaiden 2 for NES.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Either way, this games sucks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:06 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even if their slanty eyes don't give it away, proof that you can never trust japs. They'll stab the white man in the back as soon as they can make a yen out of it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by kairuu
    Comment by Anonymous
    00:59 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No. Yours.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:01 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you both suck

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:43 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://www.destructoid.com/fact-ps3-fanboys-are-the-worst-149259.phtml

    oh you ps3 fans... every straw etc.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    06:28 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's really fun and eye-widening. I mean, I knew about the kind of stuff Sony fanboys throw tantrums at, but never actually cared to sit down and compare it to other kinds of fanboys.

    Thanks, Anon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:07 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Great article, I bookmarked that shit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:18 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That article made me smile. Also I've never been to the site before but his other articles seem just as good.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:57 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, did they develop the same game two times? Why changing all the textures and models? It doesn't make any fucking sense.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:03 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because they have to have an excuse why a game that's over a year old and in the x360 bargain bin for $20 is going to cost PS3 owners $60. LOL

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:26 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Totally owned PS3 freaks with that one...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:13 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I haven't played it yet, but if those photos along with added content are what's on the PS3, then I'd gladly pay $60 for that rather than for $20 trash on the Xbox 360.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The last set of images.

    Seems PS3 doesn't copy pasta windows. Shame on you 360 shame on you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:16 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So another Beta Test for 360 ???

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Looks more like the PS3 version has been implemented with newer texturing techniques versus that on the Xbox 360 so technically, it could have been done on the Xbox as well.

    Still, it is nice to finally see a multi-platform game on a PS3 that's not graphically inferior to its Xbox 360 counterpart.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:10 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stop blowing air. The PS3 doesn't need new texturing techniques. 360 might be able to pull it off to have those same textures if you use multiple DVDs, but it's doubtful to handle the revamped AI, increased resolution to 1080p, lighting, dynamic shadows, and other effects all at the same time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:30 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Multiple DVDs? Are you out of your freaking mind? The 360 version doesn't even fill half a DVD.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:10 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's a reason for that. 1/10th the graphical clarity, I do believe.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:30 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the 1080 resolutions just up scaled the 360 version actually has a much higher native resolution

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:20 29/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOl what the fuck are you saying lol ;] . Look at Crysis with hi hi-res stuff that'll not even run on top quality like pc doeas and the game is only 6GB big lol.

    Just shut up with this dvd vs br bullshit becouse the only diffrence is about HD prerendered movies and not graphic content for this shity hardware.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:58 28/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, no, no.

    They implemented a newer texturing method because the methods were 'newer', not because the PS3 was inferior and needed a different method.

    Ever seen Parallax Occlusion Mapping that was used in games like FEAR? Or even texture mapping methods that were used in Crysis?

    Plus it isn't about the amount data available that makes a game look better, it is all about using improved graphical methods to make the game look better and at the same time, run better due to the illusion of being super-detailed when it is actually a single flat poly textured with smarter shaders and bump maps.

    Perhaps the only reason why developers claim that blu-rays are superior is because they can now stuff in more audio data ala uncompressed such as MGS4 but that's probably just one of the many reasons of its benefits.

    Hell, it allows a lot of development headroom due to it being as large as a small hard drive.

    Do note that the GPU on a PS3 is slightly inferior to that on the Xbox 360. The only reason why games like Killzone 2 look so good is simply due to the availability of more cores on the cpu, which allow even more multiple threads to occur in a single pass versus the 4 cores that's on the Xbox 360.

    Do learn a bit more about computer graphics and play some quake. Lots to learn about computer graphics especially from the Carmack.

    So you sir, please check your facts before accusing others of blowing hot air.

    Comment by HyperKnuckles99
    23:37 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I played the PS3 demo and it looked and played good, but I would have preferred if it stayed day time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    เครื่องไม่ผิด แต่แฟนบอยเหี้ย

    Comment by DHP
    23:17 27/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ... lol, they even edited those buildings.
    So what now, will they do the same with NG3 later?

    Comment by Anonymous





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments