Microsoft Funds PS3 Game Development

patty-fleur-lucky-star.jpg

Responding to the complaints of Xbox 360 Tales of Vesperia beta testers, a developer has laid bare the not so shocking truth of just how Namco was paid off by Microsoft to secure an “exclusive” release, but instead merely used the Xbox subsidy to reduce development costs on the PS3 version, which it expected to sell better.

However, Sony intervened and blackmailed them into adding massive amounts of new content if they wanted to be allowed to go ahead with the PS3 release at all…

He goes into considerable detail on his blog:

“First off, it was easier developing for the Xbox 360. This is to do with the games I was involved with, but basically if you sign an exclusive contract with Microsoft (you won’t release it on other hardware for a year or similar), they will give you a lot of cash for development.

Their support is also very fast and complete in these cases.

SCE don’t really give much cash out (any at all perhaps). Their support is confused and unreliable. When I was doing it at least, the 360 was easier to develop for, which lowers costs.

As a result, first you develop for the Xbox, reducing development costs. But the Xbox version won’t sell [in Japan], you can’t recoup even those lowered costs at all.

So they ported to the PS3, it’s cheaper as you already have the game done, but then Sony came back and told them ‘We won’t recognise it if it’s the same as the Xbox 360 version. Make sure you put in a lot of extra stuff!’

If we didn’t then they wouldn’t have let us pass their check…”

He claims that the developers all wished to produce the best possible game with this opportunity, and had no intention of deliberately putting out an incomplete game; they were instead keen to produce a version that “even Xbox 360 players could enjoy again.”

He also claims traces of later additions found in the Xbox code merely fell victim to pressures of scheduling…

He goes on to pour cold water on the notion of a DLC Xbox 360 version, saying that it could take another year to convert all the development resources back onto the Xbox, making it impossible in practical terms.

This news seems to suggest that Microsoft has been cunningly funding the development of PS3 games by allowing developers to develop cheaply on its platform, accompanied by a huge grant paid for each “exclusive” release, with the developers then cheaply porting onto the PS3, with additional features as required…



    Post Comment »
    211 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    08:41 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL!

    I love this line "‘We won’t recognise it if it’s the same as the Xbox 360 version. Make sure you put in a lot of extra stuff!’" the ff makes it good:P
    makes it sound like you're greddy

    Comment by Fonzer
    08:53 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    well yes 1 year of waiting time and they got their development money from m$ so they could add content to the ps3 if they didn't want to accept it,m$ didn't plan this.And fuck m$ doesn't want lolis in their games.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:38 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    thankfully both consoles support mp3's, so you can just pump up motorhead, get drunk & get on with your lifes! cheers...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:43 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats why 360 sucks shame FAIL

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:45 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who are whether MS is generous they suck at bribing game anyway.360 IS FAIL fuk halo never get enough of masked man? and now odst? fail

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:37 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    thankfully both consoles support mp3's, so you can just pump up motorhead, get drunk & get on with your life! cheers...

    Comment by Fonzer
    08:35 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OP pic?
    MOE flash damage?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:02 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not that worried, though it feels very crazy it just happened like that

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:56 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Holy shit, I'm really getting tired of these fucking PS3 vs. 360 articles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:34 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    m$ is so generous...

    Comment by Fonzer
    09:27 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i think he did mention it in a previous article.

    Comment by g0dslay3r
    09:21 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is what should have happened to ff13.i dont some half assed game because of the 360

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:30 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Now even star ocean 4 is coming to ps3, they so call exclusive games will soon be over

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:33 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So that's two exclusives down, Over 9000 to go.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:30 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This also helps explain why these games end up looking/running worse on the PS3. Devs too lazy to make good use (if any) of the Cell, since it would require major rewrites of the game's code. They end up relying mainly/exclusively on the PPE and RSX, which aren't as powerful as the 360's CPU and GPU. So the games end up being just quick ports with some extras thrown in. And it isn't just 360 -> PS3 either; Virtua Fighter 5, Unreal Tournament 3, Cross Edge, etc.

    One side gets the play the game a year early, and the other gets a year-late port with lots extras and performance issues (in most cases) at full price, while the original can be found for $30 or less by the time the port comes out.

    We're all losers here, folks.

    I say we boycott all 3rd party games that don't get a simultaneous multiplatform release.

    Comment by Spider20
    09:01 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    loli <3
    Patty <333

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:07 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, not really. Artefact's hiding quite a bit of facts in this post...

    "He does not however mention the traces of later additions found in the Xbox code…"

    ...either that, or he's blind.

    *quote*
    360であったPS3版追加要素の痕跡は、単純に入れたかったけど間に合わなかったのが正解だろう。
    わざわざカットする理由が無い。
    優先度の低いモノからカットされるのだから、追加要素になったモノはカットされたモノの復活と考えるのが自然ではないだろうか。
    */quote*

    Rough translation:
    The traces of PS3 additional content found in 360, was most likely just simply that they wanted to put it in, but just didn't managed to make it in time.
    There is just no reason for cutting it out on purpose.
    To cut things(content) of low priority first, and to revive the cut content as additional content elements is just natural, isn't it?

    Comment by Artefact

    Fixed. A simple oversight on my part.

    Comment by Myballz
    09:12 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Xbox 360 can make Add-on downloadable content for games if you can afford the points to buy the new content. Fallout 3 for example you can add new expansion which allows you to play more content which other Game Developers would proudly add more gamming content for the fans to play.

    And Yet Namco Game Developers making that excuse.

    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    06:21 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course Sony would say that...they want more people to buy the PS3 version as well, it's helping Namco Bandai as well. ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:24 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ofc sony has to be complete douchebags and fucking bitch

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:09 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's over for Microsoft. No games left, just E74 errors and the Red Ring of Death. Now that the PS3 slim has been officially released and with an unstoppable lineup to boot, Sony will overcome and destroy the competition, just like they did the previous 2 generations.

    PlayStation 3. It only does everything.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:31 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So it plays my PS1/PS2 games?

    I thought so.

    It only does everything my ass.

    Comment by InfiniteNine
    10:52 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mine plays my PS1/PS2 games. ;)

    Also: All PS3s can play PS1 games.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:25 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't really see why people are getting so bent outa shape about this, it's been going on for years. If a game is only exclusive for a short time it makes sense that the second version would be improved/different as the company producing it would have more time to continue developing the software.

    One game that comes to mind is the first Onimusha which was a PS2 game that eventually got ported over to the Xbox as Genma Onimusha, the changes were so extensive it was basically a different game.

    So in closing, this isn't the first time that this has happened nor will it be the last. After all Business is Business and developers will do whatever they need to do to turn a profit. Be it improve a port, give exclusive DLC, or drive dump trucks full of cash up to each others doors to insure an edge.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:28 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, if microsoft wants to pay for timed exclusives than that is what they get. It's ridiculous to think that a developer can't improve on their game to give it more value for money. To me its more irresponsible to deliver a game that you know has some problems when you can go ahead and fix them and make a better game for the customers. Heck people that own Tales of vesperia in an x box that also have a Ps3 might think of getting it also in the ps3. This breaths in new life to the game.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, and so was Enron, Haliburton, et cetera. In the end, a bribe is still a bribe, I mean at least Sony has standards...

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:01 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    God damn fanboyism is terrible. On a more related note, I believe this port will cause me to buy a PS3 too along with my sleek Xbox 360. And then later, a Wii.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:03 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "He goes on to pour cold water on the notion of a DLC Xbox 360 version, saying that it could take another year to convert all the development resources back onto the Xbox, making it impossible in practical terms."

    I'm going to laugh if we see DLC 360 version after the PS3 release (though I doubt it), as the above excuse is pure BS.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:40 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    RRoD 360 FAGS STATUS: BUTTHURT & TOLD

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:36 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is FUCKING epic lololololololol

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:24 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Everyone who wanted it on the 360 already bought it. If you liked the game you liked it. Who cares if another version with some added bonuses came out over year later. Nobody will ever see me run to get Ninja Gaiden Sigma or Eternal Sonata. I have both systems too. I treat things like this like metal gear solid 3 subsistence. If you have never played it get the new version. If you have played it before stick with the original.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:42 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tales of V. is Shit anyway the Ps3 can have it when they want HALO 3 FTW Fck Ps3

    Comment by ScarredBushido
    02:55 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    halo 3 is sooo overrated

    Comment by Fonzer
    19:37 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    kinda shitty shooter game sometimes.

    Comment by ScarredBushido
    02:58 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the only reason im pissed off is cause of the extra content there getting and with hearing star ocean 4 being released on ps3 im happy cuz my mate can play it but i hope with Star ocean they give xbox 360 at least the chance to download the language pack

    Comment by onitake
    22:05 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    truth be spoken!
    ... at least about why development for 360 is cheaper or "easier" than for the ps3.
    considering how expensive it has become to develop high-profile games, it's hardly surprising how the business works. developers/publishers take any incentive they can get, and the console manufacturers butter serious money in titles that are expected to sell, so they can collect big licensing $$$ later on.
    microsoft has at least recognized the potential of indie studios (you have to start somewhere, right?), while sony and nintendo still sit on their precious hardware like hawks.
    the gp32 has shown well that a purely open platform isn't the best way to go, as it's difficult to get publishers port their high-profile titles without much incentive. console and game sales go hand in hand. good marketing alone can't save you the day...

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:15 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Something I noticed in the bonus Mysterious Unison dungeon in Eternal Sonata, on the final floor before the dungeon boss it had two empty rooms in the Xbox 360 version while in the PS3 version they were filled with weapons for the PS3 exclusive playable Crescendo and Serenade characters. So that there is proof that they were planning on releasing on a console besides the Xbox360 from the start.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:19 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ok thats officially the stupidest most miss interpreting heading for a article i have ever seen.
    now i know why bull was the first thought into my head when i saw it.
    ive lost all respect for asian developers.
    they have completely sold themselves down the river, they use to be about quality now all there worried about is $$$$$$$$$$.
    capcom, square enix, namco bandi have all recently turned to crap.
    congrats guys you have sold your soul to the devil, i hope it was worth it.
    what happened to the good ol days where developers were worried about quality?
    they just wanted to go down in the books of history.
    now all their worried about is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    who cares if our game sucks donkey balls as long as it brings in the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    ala halo or guitar hero.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:13 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah Last I remember they Do Sony IP's only

    I am open to correction.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:22 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shut the heck up man.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:39 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Other websites posting this story have posted updates, saying the blogger featured in this article never worked on ToV, he worked on Vampire Rain. Apparently, it had a similar situation, being ported from 360 to ps3 after a year, but I doubt the guy is in any position to talk about the ToV code or if DLC is possible. Not to mention his crappy vampire game has a metacritic ranking of 38, and it makes me wonder how much his experience as a shovelware maker would differ from a developer that actually made good games.

    But if this is merely another troll 360 owners post, then carry on Artefact, carry on.

    Comment by ScarredBushido
    03:03 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the only thing im pissed off about is the fact that there getting extra content other then that im happy now my friend can play it thats the same with star ocean 4 i just want the langague pack so hopefully DLC

    Comment by Kamigod
    05:30 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dreams eh, nothing wrong with havin them

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:16 20/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    NAMCO BANDAI removed charactors from 360 version for selling PS3 version.

    Tales of Vesperia had benn released by NAMCO BANDAI one year ago on xbox 360,and was released on Playstaion3.
    We have benn claiming that they removed several elements,and then,we find one of the evidence.
    Look at this image:

    http://www.dotup.org/uploda/www.dotup.org160606.jpg

    If it were added charactors,there isn't bank holes.So it is clear to be removed.
    They were planning to cause who bought 360 ver to buy PS3 version.
    Maybe They regard gamars as useful machine paying money.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:54 20/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just wanted to thank every XBox360 owners for beta testing, you guys make sure the game will be great, or lets say better when it's released for the PS3. We need guinea pigs to ensure quality, and I dont mind if they use Microsoft fanboys as labour rats.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:41 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, that sucks...

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:00 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    snape kills dumbledore! seriously before the game is release, there will be spoilers. and rpg strongest point is story.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:08 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Um, that guy's not actually a Namco dev, guys. He's a dev from another company talking about his own experiences.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:04 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Japanese hypocresy at it maximum level...

    Comment by greenpoint0
    11:08 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's a war of the consoles. Perhaps I suggest the Wii?
    (lol, sorry, but I had to).

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:09 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    rankaaaaaaaaa!!!!! (see OP)

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:29 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He goes on to pour cold water on the notion of a DLC Xbox 360 version, saying that it could take another year to convert all the development resources back onto the Xbox, making it impossible in practical terms.

    more like "We don't expect any functioning xbox 360 in the near future to still exist"

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:02 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I paid 60$ for the "Beta" (which isnt really a Beta by any Software Engineering definition at all - Beta means FEATURE-COMPLETE BUT BUGGY, and this was the exact opposite of that), and didn't feel ripped off. It's still a great game. And I'd still buy the PS3 version too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:06 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *fap fap fap*

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:39 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sucks to be you 360 faqs!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:22 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What is a 360 Frequently Asked Question>?

    Watch your Acronym there little boy.

    You are a embarrassment to the Gaming community.. Go play outside.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:42 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So basically, Microsoft is generous and Sony is an asshole.

    Surprised really.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:14 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Microsoft generous...LMFAO. You mean the company that forces developers to charge for DLC. $5 for some Masterchief armor for your Mii...i mean "avatar".

    All Microsoft do is bribe timed exclusives. Its just logical sony would want extra incentives for the ports a year later otherwise the game would be DOA. Do you honestly think a JAPANESE company would decide to make a jrpg for the 360 out of the kindness of their hearts? all the rpgs on the 360 have BOMBED thats a FACT, stupid 13 year old americans play HALO all day long.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:33 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dynamic Themes anyone..
    PSN has the same Charging Customrers for DLC... Dont be Silly now.

    Sony Charges Companies to have there DLC up there unlike MS which has everything paid for due to xbox Live.. which is also prob why there is a lot more Content on LIVE marketplace than there is on PSN.

    If you dont want to buy themes or avatar clothes then dont... No one is forcing you..

    oh yeah PS HOME has the same thing to buy Stuff for your Virtual home ..which is still in beta..

    I LOL at fanboys seriously.. the Sony Ones are the funniest.

    Where are the Nintendo dudes oh wait they prob too tired from Waggeling on Wii Sports Resort or something..

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:21 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uh, no. Microsoft lied to us about the game being exclusive. That's why people are pissed. Ports happen, it's not a big deal, even if they come with new content. But what IS a big deal is that we're told "Only for Xbox 360" and see a port (with new content) just a year later. That's called lying.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:49 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    MS bribed first and after that Sony tried to secure the games sales by asking more content. so Sony is the asshole?

    AWESOME LOGIC

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:21 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And how exactly is a company giving incentives to develop for their own frekking product a bribe ? NICE LOGIC ASSWIPE!

    Now go die please ...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:23 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe you should re read the article on how they did it..

    Sony Told them by blackmail to do it otherwise the game will not go passed the Check point.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:52 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Microsoft paying for timed exclusive so they can move console sales in Japan over the ps3 is generous, while sony requiring additional content so they don't have sloppy seconds is asshole?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:25 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes. through blackmailing as well.

    Comment by Fonzer
    04:36 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    still waiting for a dreamcast 2

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:20 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it plays Dreamcast 1 games yeah that would be sweat rumor is its going to have a i7 Core CPU

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:26 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL now waiting for the complete version of Star Ocean 4

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:30 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thanks, RRoD 360 fags, your helpful beta testing will give us PS3 Slim owners better game and enjoyment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:20 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what a intelligent Post.. well done man..

    RROD LOL Never had that.. in my 5 xbox 360 oh which MS gave excellent service about it costed me nothing I scored 4 games in the process too.

    PS3 Slim.. LOL same thing just smaller nothing specially oh wait you cant run Linux on it now...oh well slowly but surely they are taking features OUT of the PS3.. BC anyone?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:47 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Insulting someone just because they own a different system? They are VIDEO GAMES. How is that something to be insulted over? It's incredible how you can make such a short comment, and sound completely stupid with just a few words.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:56 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When you are a no-life, the only thing left for you is your game console obsession, do not blame him he needs something to hang on or he's going to kill himself.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:03 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Before it was "Sony funds Xbox 360 hardware development"*
    Now its "Microsoft funds PS3 software development."

    What goes around, comes around.

    *referring to the notion that the 360's processor is based off the same IBM PowerPC architecture that was being reengineered to eventually have the feature set that was to become the Cell. Sony paid $$$ to have totally overhauled new PPC architecture from scratch; Microsoft entered in the middle of the development cycle and walked off with an "off-the-shelf" processor and pumped out their next-gen console first.

    Personally, I say SCREW YOU ALL. You should have been making JRPGs for the PC in the first place. But noooo, you want us all to go buy consoles. Now that we buy consoles, you make more JRPGs for handhelds. Now you want us all to go buy handhelds. Fukken Japs and their fukken JRPGs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:37 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    JRPG on PC! X3 Now that would be cool. PC is supreme, imagine all the challenge the community could creates! Fucking console for suckers!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:07 17/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck off, poorfag. Everything or nothing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:06 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol fking idiots. MS doesn't give a shit about you and your gaming needs just look at your rehashed shit you call shooters. 8 weapons 6 online maps 1 character model with different color schemes and online. Seriously are you fking proud of that? That you get this kinda shitty treatment on a monthly basis.

    If Sony's actions of telling these companies to stop being lazy and be more considerate of their consumers and give them what they deserve means being a dick move then I'm all up for it. Fk having 3 mini bosses 1 main boss 1 extra boss and 4 fking playable characters in my jrpgs. That kinda shit would get old fast.

    Yet whatever everyone single 360 fanboy is too busy riding MS's cock to realize that the companies are treating you like shit as they laugh their ass off to 1m sales and above.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd say the same about PS3 fanboys, but PS3 games are lucky if they break one million in sales.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:19 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sony is the shooter console. Less JRPG and WRPG than 360 and it has more shooters. Just look at Uncharted, Socom, Killzone, warhawk, resistance 1 and 2 and then more.

    Your trolling the wrong console lol.
    And what FPS you talking about?
    What? TOV is huge, you probably wouldn't know cos you've got a good year or two wait ahead of you to get it but there's no 'having 3 mini bosses 1 main boss 1 extra boss and 4 fking playable characters in my jrpgs'. Much more content than that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:12 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When a shooter has 8 weapons, it's generally a bad shooter. When a shooter has 6 maps, it's generally a bad shooter.

    And anyway, the majority of 360 games are not shooters. The majority of games that are advertised are shooters. Your one of the types who still live in a fucking cave and don't realize this.

    360 has more rpgs than a non-bc PS3, but PS2 and even PS1 rapes all current-gen consoles with rpgs. 360 also has more eroge games, which are also less censored than PS3 eroge games, because of Sony's retarded checks. Well guess what. PC has all the uncensored eroge games and dating sims you could want.

    So stop hating on Microsoft, it's just proving that their doing something right to piss you off. Fucking fanboy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:14 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    someone just got trolled

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dick move by sony?

    I wonder how they bribed/blackmailed naughty dog with uncharted 2 then.

    The fact that there's more content doesn't mean it's a dick move. It's a fact that Sony's pushing for QUALITY. Something Microsoft doesn't seem to give a shit about and their loyal blind install base is willing to waggle their ass at. Just look at all the god damn rehashed fps. 8 fking weapons 6fking maps 1fking character with different color options and online. Whose the one really being the dick? The one that gives wants to make $50 a year from each consumer, releasing a defaulty product so it can shit on you forcing you to buy another one and increasing their sales numbers (until it happened so much MS got sued for it) or Sony's whose telling companies be more considerate of your installbase and aim for new heights? All MS is doing is pampering lazy developers and lazy development. In which you fking wanna be gamers are gonna continue getting the same rehashed shit over and over again. Fking idiots.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "I wonder how they bribed/blackmailed naughty dog with uncharted 2 then"

    fyi Sony OWNED Naughty Dog

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:55 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Microsoft are awesome

    I paid them to suck my cock and they did

    great guys

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:57 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You idiot Anon.

    Microsoft pays you to suck your dick. Retard paid them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:13 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^ Here's somebody who sucked M$'s dick and love it. How's it feel in your mouth, 04:57 Anon?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:52 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe is tastes the same of your Sony dick experience ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:34 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry dude, my Sony was a busty chick so yeah, it, like totally, PWNED your Micro-dick ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That is simply bad business done by M$. Well someone could look at it in a way saying that this made them sell more consoles in Japan (and in some other places) which is true, but considering the amount they must have given these companies to produce the game and hold its exclusivity for only a year is a market disaster, because it takes away the complete trust the consumers have in the system and the company not to mention the money. In future releases the consumers will think "why the hell am I buying the 360 version if in a year the PS3/Wii version will come with more stuff than this". Well if it was me I'd rather wait a year and get a better version than an incomplete version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:18 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am pretty sure Namco and MS has made there money back if not Profit about it otherwise they would be repeating the process all the time..

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:41 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How do you expect them to try and get a foot hold if they don't try and compete? It was good business sense to try and get a foothold in Japan or they'd constantly have a territory where Sony and Nintendo defeated them so in the hardware sales they'd always be at a disadvantage. Naturally it was a risk though as they're the under dog but it was something worth trying. Getting exclusives that don't last is bad business sense though as it erodes the confidence consumers have in going for the product.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:07 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not saying that they're not trying to get a foot hold in Japan. But if they really want to increase sales there they need to get their hands on real exclusives and not timed ones. This is just another reason for the Japanese not to buy the 360 if it's exclusive will get ported to their national gaming console with even more stuff.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:06 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah sry bout that. Perhaps I wasn't to explicit at first ^^

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:14 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah I agree on the real exclusives thing. It's not working with the current method as people catch wind of it coming to PS3 and just wait or they can tell during interviews the companies have a PS3 version lined up. It then sucks when they don't have an exclusive to show for there money just a year down the line. I agree on that I guess. I kind of mistook your post as saying they shouldn't try with JRPG and japan.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:17 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As an XBox 360 owning JRPG-loving weeaboo, I don't have a problem with this as long as some PS3 JRPG exclusives get ported the other way (and I'm looking at you anything from Atlus or NIS).

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:24 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    there is no reason for anyone to port these games to 360 in japan,
    but if there is an international release, they have to think about the money they can make out of it.

    look at ff13 maybe its not worth even the cost of making the dvds on japan for a 360 release.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:55 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just wait a few months...
    Disgaea 3 and Cross Edge will get ported to PSP with better graphics

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's why they aren't even bothering with a 360 release in Japan. The 360 version of FF13 will be for America, Europe, Australia, etc.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:17 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    At least they are using there brain on that one.

    FF12 was a fucking disapointment I havent bothered finishing it.. Its crap..

    SE hasnt made a decent game in years what was the last Game I enjoyed from SE .. KH series err yeah I think thats it..

    Unless its cause im old Skool JRPG lover.. oh wait no I am enjoying Lost Oddesey a lot by the dude that made FF since He left SE hasnt made a decent FF game..

    I didnt like FF10 much but still a lot better and more tech involved than FF12 that took too long to release on a Old Gen when it should of been next Gen in my Opinion maybe It would make me want to play it more..

    FF7 FTW

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:53 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Microsoft should have known these kinds of games only sell well in Japan, where it is the only place the ps3 is a bestseller.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:38 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, they meant to change the tides there, to no avail as you can see.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:13 18/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The PS3 Is Currently The Best Selling Console WORLD WIDE, Get Your Facts Right... Only A Best Seller In Japan.. Ha

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:02 02/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Best selling console worldwide...what a joke...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:09 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah that is why they are doing it hello.. Its japan JPRG sell like hotcakes dude..

    If MS has no JRPG market in japan It just means less Consoles to be sold in Japan...

    Obvious Dont you think>?

    I think MS did a right thing.. Actually Funding a dev that is developing for there console unlike Sony as stated on the article that they may not even get Money from Sony when Developing for them I am not surprised as Sony Makes losses on a PS3 anyway which is the stupidest move for any business..

    Sony did a Wrong doing but got what they wanted.. it worked so be it.. but How long will a strategy Like that last? Seriously When will a company (Besides Activision lets not go there) say Fuck you Sony If you don't want our game its your loss..

    JRPG's are welcomed around the world Sadly its main Market is in japan for those Devs If the Japs want a good JRPG then they go buy that game regardless of what Console it is on I do that with my games I dont see why ppl shouldn't get over the fanboysim and just be a gamer not a childish Fanboy.

    - Ouji San

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:47 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +9000

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:32 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's why Microsoft was trying to get a foothold by getting those kind of games first. They underestimated just how xenophobic the Japanese were.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:49 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    iPod says hello! Japan is no more racist than U.S.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:46 16/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://www.hrdc.net/sahrdc/hrfeatures/HRF39.htm

    http://www.indexmundi.com/japan/ethnic_groups.html

    Yeah. Coupled with the retardedly difficult to acquire citizen-status and nigh resounding refusal to give the vote to ''foreigners'' (Koreans who have been living there for years and even pay tax)

    Green Card says hello.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments