Tekken 6 PS3 vs Xbox 360

TEKKEN IS FAIL DOA IS WIN

Look to all you fanboys of the 360 let me break something down for you. Tekken 6 and Tekken 6 BR are both built on the PS3's cell processor technology. The game looks amazing in the arcade. But in order for namco to make an equal product for both console they had dumb down the graphic engine for the PS3 port and make the X360 port slighty better. It's simple fact you can't deny it. Both look pretty much the same it's just shitty that they couldn't take full advantage of the processing power the PS3. But at the end of the day it doesn't matter. Noobs will get it on the 360 and hardcore Tekken players will get it on the PS3

Still, Tekken 3 for Playstation 1 is way more fun to play. In Gameplay VS Graphics, graphics never win.

Why doesn't this shitty fighting game series get non-flat, realistic stages already? Dead or Alive has them, Virtua Fighter 3 (and only that one, sadly) had them... plus, the floor textures look like ass.

Oh, and it's better to wait for some real performance comparison on these, like Digital Foundry's. With, you know, something better than useless artifact-filled low quality JPEGs...

Aaaand Tekken 6's original arcade version runs on System 357 hardware, which itself is based on PlayStation 3 hardware (as has always been the case with Namco games since around 1994), so the PS3 porting should be a breeze... no excuses this time when it comes and looks better on the 360. ;D

Xbox 360 more dark picture

Ps3 little more clear

=/

Nothing better than a console comparison thread to start a flamewar.. lol

360 fail anyway,why are you guys discussing this? FFXIII need 3 dics dont make me laugh.FAIL

Same here, there's even one at the University I attend.

I'm truely neutral when it comes to the 360/PS3 wars but, in this case(drum roll please)........................the 360 version pretty easily comes out on top.The frame rate ought to be better on the 360 version as well if the devs of the game use the extra video memory and the stronger gpu to their advantage.

how can you tell that when one is lit and the other isn't?

i also wasted a minute for each one to spot differences and i can only spot them on the second picture, in the 360 version the environment at the center of the image is darker than the ps3, if you notice in the 360 version the tree blends with the mountain because of the darkness while in the ps3 version you can see the branches... if thats good or bad i don't know

to me they look the same, both bad that is... probably because of the jpeg compression...

with this sort of comparison you would have to view the actual gameplay. a shity picture would never give the games due justice. so lets all wait to buy the game to see the freggin differences. duh

You cannot compare graphics quality with a lossy compression format, especially if the difference is minuscules to begin with.

The Xbox has SLIGHTLY smoother lighting effects, but I think everyone is missing the point: who's going to notice when you're actually PLAYING THE GAME?

I see no damn difference between the Xbox360 and Ps3 booth will look OK.
I have it preordered but now that I know it's not even 720p I might cancel it. Maybe for Tekken 7 they take the effort to make it full HD. WTF this low resolution on a 42ich TV will look shit.

I see the difference; they both have horrible ground textures.

wow i thought that was a black sagat for a sec

arcana hearts 2 ps2 port owns these t6 ports for free

good thing to see Xbox taking the cake in this one

XBL > PSN

Street Fighter 4 > Tekken 6
Street Fighter 6 (after a few dozens of ALPHAs, Turbos and whatnot) > Tekken 15..

man, shit on tekken. Tekken was good when the PSX was still THE console. I loved Tekken 3 back then.

look the smoke in the pic nmber 3 compar
360 is better ..

this is fake!!! look at the name for the fighters!!xbox 1 have diffrent name

Overall performance, ergonomics and flexibility:

360 > Saturn (both original and multicontroller) > Xbox Controller S > DualShock > Genesis/ Mega Drive 6-buttons > GameCube > Nintendo 64 > [insert various systems here] > Wii

Not every single one, but most of them either have higher resolution/ better graphics, a higher/ more stable framerate, or have less glitches/ bugs on the 360.

The Internet is chock full of research on this subject (and porn, but that's beyond the point), so it isn't necessary to own either of the two systems to have an extensive comparison.

Bamco damn downgraded the PS3 version. The arcade that runs on PS3 is displaying 720p.
The PS3 home version should be displayed at 1080p w/c was originally intended. >_<

LOOK I HAVE A 360 AND PS3 AND I AM BUYING IT ON 360 BECAUSE I BELIEVE ONLINE IT IS A BETTER SYSTEM. THERE IS NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO GRAPHICALLY and is not worth my time thinking about it.I do believe that the xbox 360 is a better system at the moment and i spend more time on it. But in the future i tend to believe the ps3 will start to dominate the market mainly because of the blue ray capabilities
From David Mudge daveeboy@windowslive.com

I don't give a shit about these comparasion as long as i get to play the games i want.
I have ps3 atm but gonna get 360 so i can play Alan Wake and some other 360 exclusives.

What a fucking fanboy article

Fighting games for me are way better on Xbox 360.
Online is way serperior aswell.
I still have troubles finding a match on Street Fighter IV (PS3) that I gave up.
I always find good connections when playing fighting games on Xbox 360.
The same will be for Tekken 6.
I've been using the 360 D-Pad for years now and I really don't see any issue with it.

DOA is a fantastic fighting game, great graphics and very smooth gameplay.

Tekken is a good fighting game but I prefer the real legend that is SoulCalibur.

Tekken still feels old and outdated compared to the games that use the 8 way run with analog sticks.

You still have to hold back in Tekken to block where every other fighting game uses a button.
Holding back to block should stay in Street Fighter and only Street Fighter.

Also when you get knocked down in tekken it's a hellish experiance when facing cheap ass characters like Lili to get back up.

The recovery response is horrible in tekken games.

SoulCalibur IV may not have been the the best in the series but the previous games I will remember and cherish forever.

Don't see a difference, so whatever.

Still excited though. :)

Doesn't matter, tekken is crap.

u know there is no fucking differnce between them if have same hdmi cable on same tv. change it and there will be a differnce, some tv work better with a partcular console. i tried it on friends but it isn;t really worth worrying about as like one pixel differnce

xb seems better...

I don't believe that still shots can show the difference in gameplay or graphic quality on systems either - the 360 or the PS3 might run a little choppy.

"A mere 1368x768?" That's a higher resolution than the PS3 is running at - the difference is the PS3 is using AA. AA is pretty taxing, which is why they're running at a lower resolution and upscaling. To me, it looks like the 360 is using blur AA at normal resolution and the PS3 looks like it's using real AA and upscaling.

You're not going to be able to get a positive quality difference 2560x1440 full capture of identical benchmarks. Two separate 1280x720 identical benchmarks played simultaneously would also suffice.

There were definitely problems with the Xbox 360 before, fortunately even though I was an early purchaser I never experienced a true RROD. I did, however, get one of the ones that etched circles in to your discs. RMA'd it and got a new one that is a little louder, but no issues at all. The most recent Jasper chipset that is making its way to becoming the majority of the stock of retail stores pretty much doesn't RROD because it runs so much cooler.

Fighting games suck. End.

PS3 looks way better...

cant see any fucking difference

Okay, this was a funny article. Credit where credit's due.

The PS3 version is clearly better!

Tekken doesn't really excite me anymore after watching all those floaty juggles in every sequel.

Don't see any difference, and it's not gonna make a difference in buying which version as well (PS3).

There needs to be a Wii version.
Why?
I want to see the three way flame wars. YEAAAAAH!

I don't even care about fighting games, but seeing people argue over which looks better when it's the same damn thing, just slight graphic differences, will forever make me lol.

You forgot that it will be also released on PSP

nope

guys, don't get excited for T6

T5 DR and SC4 are living proof that namco don't know how to code decent netcode, it'll be yet another shitty, laggy as fuck fighter online.

Go masturbate to pictures of lady gaga (lili) instead.

Don't care... Tekken sux.

Very minor difference in term of lighting effects and it's hard to notice

tekken don't have neco arc or mech hisui. actress again>>>tekken

Ok...

When I was a wee lad, I dealt with strong differences between consoles. Try Atari 2600 vs Intellivision vs Commodore 64 vs Colecovision vs NES vs Sega...

I didn't hate it, I found it rather interesting how you'd have a super popular hit, like Q-Bert or Frogger, and so the big company would commission a port for every major platform, failure is not an option... And what was included or done better or worse really painted a picture. Does anyone remember the print ads on the back of comic books that actually show 12 or so screen shots?

The only suckage was when they tried to do something that simply couldn't be realized due to the technology at that time, like Pac-Man on the Atari 2600. The "Movie" category fell especially into this game system. Indiana Jones and the Lovecraft level failure of "ET"...

The 2600 got most of the horror stories, due to it being very popular a lot longer than expected and being "Obsolete" but still selling newer and newer games as the arcade and competing technology improved. It triumphed over the much more advanced (and expensive) Intellivision and the later ColecoVision, but eventually was erased by the video game crash and the NES...

Overall, even the "Flops" were amazing works of programming. Imagine if you had slightly less available data than one of these square "Thumbnail" images, and it had to be all in machine language and you had to mix drawing the image with the very slow processor which had to also calculate which sprite was doing what or what the controls were doing... The classic hit "Adventure" for instance was made because it was impossible to port or make a game like "Zork" an all-text adventure.

Now, the only part of the modern "Console" debate I agree with is where some part is "Censored". Wish we had Ero games in the states, I bet Idol Master would sell like mad, but... Well, I've raved my thoughts on "The Pig ladies of the UN"...

That is a horrible lack of detail on the PS3 version. The PS3 version looks fuzzy and lacking of clear lines exactly the same way the PC to TV Plextor device sends any computer game to the VHS tape.

If its the PS3 version, we would expect that we could see tiny sweat droplets around the side of the face and the divisions that make up the legs on a female. Not trasposition graphics conversions which the PS3 seems to be using.

if they look exactly the same and the ps3 is said to be the god machine compared to the noob x360

then ps3 is failing

Looks pretty same-y to me! Good for them! Regardless, I'm sure it's a matter of time before someone with fanboy-vision puts one of 'em on the same level as the PSP version, looks-wise.

Looks the same, really.

The only major difference is in the texture resolutions and lighting. The xbox version has slightly, and I do mean SLIGHTLY, softer shadows.

Examples of differences in lighting:
Screencap 1, Alissa is standing in front of a broken pillar. You will notice that the shadows are darker in the ps3 pic while it is lighter in the xbox pic. While I would have thought that the PS3 would have better lighting due to it's multiple processors, it seems that they decided to go with SLIGHTLY better detail on character models rather than world environment.

In this first screen, the xbox shows better diffuse lighting over that post.

Examples of difference of texture detail:
Let's examine the third screenshot. You'll notice that the pants on Kazuya show a little more detail in the fabric on the ps3 than it does on the xbox.
Because the ps3 is running at a lower resolution, it's got 2xAA going on to reduce the jaggies. The xbox is running a much higher resolution with no AA, but the effect is virtually the same. The real benefit of running at a higher resolution is evident in the detail seen on the background textures. Take a look at the break in the wall. You'll notice that the broken concrete looks more defined on the 360 than it does on the PS3. Take into account the better lighting effects from the 360 and the end result is that the 360 is able to render the world environment slightly better than the ps3, whereas the ps3 has put more detail on the characters.

Final thoughts:
In the end, the differences are so small and minute, you're not going to notice it while you are having fun playing the game with your friends. There's no point in trying to have a virtual E-cock size match between Ps3 and Xbox 360 because you're never going to notice the differences anyway. Both systems render the game beautifully and both produce a very good image. What it comes down to is which system do you own? Buy it for that system. Do you own both systems? Then buy it for the system you play the most.