Mother Sells 6-Year-Old Daughter to Lolicon: $6 a Go

inumimi-shoujo-dominatrix.gif

A mother faces a lifetime behind bars after selling her 6-year-old daughter to her lolicon friend so he could rape and sodomise her; he also faces life.

A jury found the 48-year-old Kansas woman and her 51-year-old male accomplice guilty of two counts of rape and one of aggravated criminal sodomy.

She was found to have sold her daughter to the man for a paltry $6, with him having sex with the girl eight times. She is said to have then spent the money on whiskey and cigarettes.

The girl, now 7, took the stand in order to answer questions about her ordeal; though the defence argued she was merely telling tales in order to escape a poor home life where she was deprived of proper food and clothing, or even a bed, jurors were convinced and opted to convict.

The pair face a minimum of a 25 year sentence, with life a possibility.

Via KansasCity.com.



    Post Comment »
    208 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Magister
    21:39 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think US is a fucking terrible country but damn, at least your system punishes criminals.

    ...or that's what I'd like to think.

    Comment by Exitium
    17:36 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You've never been to Alabama have you?

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:58 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If people how are mentally handicap get the electric chair, then yeah of course no one has special privileges.

    Comment by RiderFan
    22:02 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, the man will most likely not live very long in jail. Pedophiles are the lowest on the prison tier. He'll probably be raped a few times then killed. As for the woman, she'll end up getting beaten a great many times by fellow inmates.

    Comment by Apirant
    21:16 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Six dollars for a six year old. According to this logic, a twelve year old sells for twelve dollars...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:13 27/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's just absurd and backwards. Everyone knows 6yo is worth more than 12 yo, unless we're talking about the whiskey.

    Comment by VZ
    21:07 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I saw the pretty much the same thing on an episode of Steve Wilkos titled "Devil Mom."

    Fucking nuts.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:51 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Artefact, can't you just tell us if there was evidence?
    You already said it was anal, so they found injuries, right?
    So people don't need to imagine some kind of evil 6-year old loli raping a poor 50+ man and accusing him and her mother... unless that's what you want to, what seems like to be the case.

    Comment by 13k
    01:04 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    read the source of the article, the link is provided, in particular when it mentions the older sisters. It's more than enough evidence, imho.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:38 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dude it could still be a lie,especialy becouse it took so long to tell everything,probably she could have been told what to say or was affected so much by the questioning and all that she started saying things that they like.

    The 20y girls could also say something like that to get revenge and hold together with their sister,becouse maybe mother didn't care for them as much as they needed.

    Also all so called friends(boyfriends i call them) from the mother could be naturaly hatted by their daughters,i had the same feeling and wished to bring a couple of her friends out of the way.

    But all this sounds like it is true,but i will still question it,due to my knowledge of knowing things.

    Comment by Riot Gear
    00:03 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Toto,i think where not in Kansas anymore...

    Comment by Arcane Azmadi
    23:40 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Another little reminder that sick, child-raping fucks and degenerate would-be "mother" scum aren't only found in Japan and China. Those 2 are going to have a great time in prison- prisoners who aren't as low as filthy child abusers just LOVE meeting those who are.

    Comment by Busy Person
    22:28 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anonymous said:
    actualy animals don’t always rape just for procreating,they have their drives and they can fullfill them and fight for them anyway they can,there will be no law officers and prison and all that shit for animals

    Animals DON'T rape. Go back to school learning biology or read wikipedia. They have hard sex in the agreement of each other like I said before that may look to somebody like rape but it isn't rape because both want it that way.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:52 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    pffft.Like i will believe you.Not everything is told the right way in schools and everywhere,they always hide things to make it sound nicer.
    You should understand the world as a whole and not just as a part what they tell you.

    Comment by Nimas
    22:34 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    License to be a parent now plz.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:45 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    giggity giggity giggity giggity Let's have sex!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:55 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Seems like a great deal to me.

    Comment by maniac
    18:59 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the guy faces life? ... well can't be so bad. I always thought life was good ....

    -.-
    that was the most stupid troll I have EVER done ....
    goodbye ladies and genltemen

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:50 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    $6 a 'pop' @ 8 times = more than enough for booze and some cancer sticks, and is more likely than 8 times for a total of $6.. just a random thought

    Comment by Schrobby
    18:49 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    6$ a go is way too cheap, the mother is a complete fail.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:30 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or if you work your logic around you would realize the kid made up everything. The poor folks got thrown in jail because the jurors were completely blinded by "child" and "rape".

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:37 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good 'ol USA... and where is the focus of the groups who are supposed to work against these types of things... oh yeah... on Japan and hentai... where this happens less unless they count any events in hentai/ eroge...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:11 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Best Mom Ever?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:32 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or the worst daughter ever. Lied just to get her mom in jail.

    Comment by Busy Person
    19:54 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anonymous said:
    You are a retard. Rape is just the nature’s way as intended. Pretty much every species out there procreates through forceful intercourse, or what you call “rape”. A powerful male managed to pin down a female to mate with her. There is no consent in nature. You do it whenever the hell you went, as long as you have the strength for it. Rape itself isn’t evil. It’s only evil when the goal isn’t procreation, which I guess it is in this case.

    Rape doesn't exist in nature, only at few species is hard sex existing that was made after the courtship with the agreement of each other. You sure failed at biology lessons in school.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:01 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    actualy animals don't always rape just for procreating,they have their drives and they can fullfill them and fight for them anyway they can,there will be no law officers and prison and all that shit for animals

    Comment by Busy Person
    22:23 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Like I said, animals DON'T rape. Go back to school learning biology.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:38 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Since animals don't have any verifiable notion of informed consent, the claim that rape does not exist in nature is incorrectly defined. Rape is not defined in species that can neither give nor withhold consent.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    FUCKING HENTAI SHIT THAT CAUSED THIS! LOSERS DIE!

    Comment by Exitium
    05:04 26/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What the hell are you talking about? Hentai had nothing to do with this, nor was hentai even mentioned.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 26/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WHO GIVES A FUCK, IT WAS PERHAPS A CAUSE NOT MENTIONED SO FUCK YOU!

    Comment by Arielaol
    12:30 28/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *facepalm*
    why do you even try -_-"

    Comment by Simca
    23:32 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    simca is disgusted, such a cruel mom!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:22 26/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well at least the two got a good punishment, not like in fucking Germany.

    Comment by adolf moeler
    14:11 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    who the defence sucked where phoenix when you need him

    Comment by Exitium
    17:34 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Currently working for Nintendo. They don't pay him well I hear.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:51 01/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It should be every mothers right to sell her daughter.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by ShadowOrinus
    03:13 15/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even if the girl was lying they should still convict them. "the defence argued she was merely telling tales in order to escape a poor home life where she was deprived of proper food and clothing, or even a bed..." That is still child abuse and you know if she spent the money on drugs then she's a junkie.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:05 30/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The $6 sounds suspicious. A fifth of whiskey OR a carton of cigarettes costs a lot more than that. Young girls have been known to lie before: Anybody remember reading about the Salem Witch Hunts, or that day care fiasco a few years back?

    However, in this case, it's almost certainly true. The girl's story gains a lot of credibility when you read the last couple of lines of the original story:
    "Two older sisters, now in their 20s, told authorities that their mother had also provided them to Stafford for sex when they were pre-teens and teenagers."

    She probably got the amount that her mother was charging the old pervert wrong, but the rest of it rings true.

    But the fact that the people in this case are probably guilty doesn't mean that there isn't a huge problem with public defenders: You're about as well off just defending yourself, rather than some bozo showing up 10 minutes before the trial starts and advising you to plead guilty of whatever you've been charged with, without even bothering to read what the charge is. A local PD was charging $250K per year to do the PD work for the county. But that was just one of his jobs. He was a full-time probate judge, and was coaching little league in the afternoons. If he had to actually defend anybody, it would have cut into his other jobs. There were days that he "defended" as many as 60 people and still managed to make it to little league practice at 3. He was finally fired after a TV news story exposed how much he was making on the side as a PD while receiving a full-time salary as a judge, but the replacement was even worse.

    In other words, if you don't have the money to hire a lawyer, it doesn't even matter whether you're guilty or not, you're going to jail. For a very long time. That's how we've managed to expand the prison population from 400,000 to nearly 3 million in just a couple of decades.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 27/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While I have problems with the mother selling the girl, I don't have problems with the sex in itself in this case.

    Comment by Come my little ones
    08:47 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck that bitch.
    I hope she burns in hell for eternity. Even though such a place doesn't exist.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Exitium
    17:32 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you're saying that because...?

    Comment by otakubaka
    01:49 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    that's just fucked up

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:55 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is why I hate living in red states. Because this shit happens all the time. I bet she was a redneck (and socially backwards).

    Comment by Al
    02:02 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Toto , i have a feeling we're not in Kansas any more

    Comment by Vicious
    05:45 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lawl? lolicons like em all :) we're just not gonna touch them.

    pedophile is the term for criminal abuse

    Comment by Busy Person
    06:05 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually pedophile doesn't mean that you actually rape childs...

    Comment by Kaiji
    06:20 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even if the kid was lying, they could get her mom on neglect. That woman's going to jail either way, the difference is that one would drag another guy down with her.

    Comment by Vicious
    06:35 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No. but its used as a criminology term...at least in the u.s it doesnt have any other meaning outside criminality...and the dictionary.

    so we make up words like cougars...and whatever the male acceptable equivalent is?

    otherwise pedophile is a strict criminal label. you dont have to rape "childs". it could be anything that breaks child abuse laws. posession - extreme

    Comment by Nekki
    04:11 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shizuru X Natsuki

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:38 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "he also faces life"
    The most cruel punishment that we all must face xD

    Comment by Lazydabear
    18:11 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why would you want to sell your Daughter for $6?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:27 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is why I call this case bullshit. The mom apparently has no concept of how much things are worth. $6 a pop?! That might sound a lot to a little kid, but not to an adult. $50 would be a more reasonable price tag. The kid lied to put those guys in jail. What a fucking tool.

    Comment by Busy Person
    19:44 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    6$ per rape... People should learn reading news.

    Comment by Lvrhina
    12:05 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So.....was she hot? lol

    Comment by Endeavor
    12:22 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Most lolicon will give you a biased answer.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:02 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's the joke.

    Comment by Minru
    12:23 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You have to have curves to be hot. If she was in pigtails she might have scraped a cute. But only as long as she didn't open her mouth, you know 6yr olds lol.

    Comment by Oh No xV3GAx
    12:21 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Aww I Feel Bad For Her, Now If She Was Just Doing It For Fun (the girl) it would be different... but her mother selling her... thats fucked up

    Comment by Endeavor
    12:28 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think her mother and Agnes are more or less on the bottom of my crap list by now.

    Comment by RLich
    Comment by Anonymous
    11:57 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think a round of applause for the mother is in order.

    *slowly begins to clap*

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by MeidoNiac
    11:58 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, 6yo who knows how to tell tales regarding sex and rape to adults? Good job, adults.. >_>

    Comment by gunzaku
    13:21 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    a cat can use a pc and download cp is more trustworthy than this. adults... hah!

    Comment by typographist
    11:59 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why does Sankakucomplex describe every pedophile out there as a lolicon? A lolicon doesn't have an interest in real children but drawn ones. A pedophile is someone who goes after real children. Please don't call pedophiles lolicons or lolicons pedophiles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:00 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dear fucking god..

    Comment by maga
    12:38 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whiskey and cigarettes for only six dollars? That amazing.

    Comment by Val Varo
    12:36 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good god, this woman failed at business.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:34 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder what the UN and UNICEF are doing right now...Surely it must be more important than a child who has obviously suffered from rape...right?

    "though the defence argued she was merely telling tales in order to escape a poor home life where she was deprived of proper food and clothing, or even a bed"

    Wow and these lawyers went to law school?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:31 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She got off scot free! Instead, someone should have sex with her!

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:55 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Too old, and from the South

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:55 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh my, this happened in my city.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    12:48 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In my room.

    Comment by Schrobby
    18:41 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For 6$? ^_^

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:11 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For over $ 9,000.00 ;D

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:48 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In bed with me.

    :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:27 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    in my ass

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:51 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whiskey and smokes for only $6? Almost makes moving to Kansas worth it.

    Comment by Lvrhina
    11:12 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WTf, i didn't know whiskey and cigerattes only cost 6 dollars? and they say american economy is bad. lol

    Comment by zeeohsix
    11:38 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    over here some lady pimped out her own preteen daughter for crystal meth.

    $6 for cigarettes and whiskey WTF?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:01 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Do the math. The kid was raped 8 times. That means she got 48 dollars, not 6.

    Comment by solace
    12:09 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, "do the math" -

    Ok, class, here's the next problem. If a deadbeat mother sells her 6-year old daughter to a friend for $6, and the friend has sex with the girl eight separate times, how much money does the mother make in total?

    Does anyone have the answer?

    Comment by gunzaku
    13:17 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    why doesn't she increase the price, so she doesn't need to wait so long to buy her whisky..sheesh...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:16 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    these kinds of stories make me sad

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:18 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Typical midwest.

    Comment by 13k
    11:06 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    One wonders what kind of lawyer would defend scum of the society like this.. and actually try to cook up a story about the girl lying.

    A 16 year old girl might lie, but a 6 year old? I wouldn't say impossible, but most wouldn't at that age.

    Comment by smooches
    04:50 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    All people are innocent until proven guilty, and all have the right to a fair trial. Lawyers are assigned cases by the court (public defenders). They can only turn the case down if they are currently over burdened with a high case load and cannot represent the defendant sufficiently because of this. The lawyer was just doing his job, and I am glad that he/she does this.

    Comment by nocturne
    11:57 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In America, they're known as public defenders. They're hired by the government to represent people who can't afford an attorney. Pimping your daughter for $6 dollars falls squarely in the middle of can't-afford-an-attorney territory, so I'm sure that's the kind of lawyer they got. In my opinion, these folks are the most noble lawyers of their kind. They have a thankless job, don't get paid as much, and the occasional win means you've saved an innocent person from a lifetime behind bars, or even the death penalty.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:23 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not siding with the scum, but it's important that defendants have competent legal representation.

    It's espcially important in heinous crimes, because the potential penalties for the defendant are so much higher.

    Vigrorous defense is also important to help keep the government honest.

    I know some of the law enforcement people here are corrupt.

    In one case here (Salem, Oregon, USA), officers planted evidence (drugs), lied and perjured themselves, got a warrant based on the planted drugs and lies, raided the "Outlaws" motorcycle club building, there was a shootout, one or more cops died, one or more gang members died, and some of the bikers went to jail.

    About five and a half years later, the lies were uncovered. A judge had the jailed bikers brought before him, and he apologized, and had them released. But, those guys had lost 5 1/2 years of their life! You can't return that to someone; you can't un-ass-rape someone.

    Now, there is no question that those guys were drug-dealing scum. But, the government should NOT be planting drugs and lying in court!

    Second case - the Oregon Superintendent of Corrections Michael Franke was knifed to death in 1989 on the steps of his office building. The police later "found" a suspect, who was convicted, even though there were so many holes and unanswered questions.

    On the day of the murder, my mom and I read the newspaper article. We looked at each other and spoke at the same time.

    Me: "I wonder who was _really_ behind that?"
    Her: "Someone made that murder happen. Someone who had secrets they wanted to stay buried."

    Important note: Michael Franke's personal job priority was, "Cleaning up corruption in the prison system."

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:14 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not that the lawyers are bad. It's their jobs to promote themselves by way of winning cases.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:45 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah, he seems to be doing a really good job, too.

    NOT

    Comment by Tatsu
    11:17 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They often exaggerate things though.

    Regardless of how guilty a person is, by law they are supplied with a state lawyer for a 'fair trial'.

    Its fun to have your imagination seeing the prosecutor and defence yelling Objection at each other, Phoenix Wright style though.

    Comment by Adoring Fan
    12:25 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Objection!!!

    Comment by gunzaku
    13:15 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *exciting bgm cuts it*

    Comment by K9T
    13:11 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Considering its a constitutional right to representation in court... We do still care about the constitution in this country, right?

    So, what do you think the lawyer should do? The clients say they are innocent, it is his duty as a lawyer of the ABA to plead their case the best he can.

    I'm curious as to your alternatives.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:27 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's people like you that have knee-jerk reactions that there are innocent people in jail.

    A woman accuses a man of raping her. YOU: BURN THE FUCKER, I HOPE HE GETS ASS RAPED.

    BUT OF COURSE, if she said so it must be true! Women OBVIOUSLY DO NOT LIE about rape because they're saints!

    But what's this? She lied? Oh well, she must've been pressured into it. That man that had his life ruined because he was accused despite being innocent? Too bad for him I guess.

    Just because they MIGHT not lie does not mean they WILL NOT lie.

    If everybody thought like you (though I guess about 80% of Americans do anyways), there'd be no need for lawyers. Accused? Forget that, just go straight to guilty. In fact, let's just erase the word 'innocent' from the dictionary.

    Nowadays it's "Guilty until proven innocent" instead of "Innocent until proven guilty."

    That's not to say the little girl didn't get raped BUT YOU MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL POSSIBILITIES if you want a fair trial.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:33 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    +1

    I call this trial bullshit. When the jurors heard the words "child" and "rape" in the same sentence they probably found the defendants guilty already.

    Comment by 13k
    16:47 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    From the reply comments, some of you have misunderstood what i meant, methinks.

    I'm all for fair legal representation, every man has that right, and if he/she can't afford it, the state will provide one. It's true in my country as well (I'm not in America, btw).

    Ok, I admit i'm biased at this point, and i do not know all the details of the case.

    What i'm just saying is that, the lawyer appointed by the courts must've had the chance to go thru the case details beforehand, and prob talked to the lolicon as well before deciding to accept the case. What the lawyer decides to do then from that point, well..
    Yes, SOMEONE has to take up the case,but.. (read my reply below)

    @K9T
    "So, what do you think the lawyer should do? The clients say they are innocent, it is his duty as a lawyer of the ABA to plead their case the best he can.

    I’m curious as to your alternatives."

    I'm not a lawyer, but if i were, looking at all the factors and details of the case (and obviously i would've asked the real truth from the lolicon), I would've followed my conscience and asked him to plea guilty for a reduced sentence, rather than going calling the child witness a liar.

    Of course, this is assuming that the lolicon did really do the deed. On the other hand, if he DIDN'T do it, then something is very wrong here, why is the child lying to get her own mom in jail? 6 year olds aren't exactly devil-incarnate (well, maybe some are ;D)

    @Anon
    "It’s people like you that have knee-jerk reactions that there are innocent people in jail.

    I'm looking at this on a case by case basis my friend. This isn't an adult woman claiming rape. How many 6 year olds do you know that can describe the act of sodomy?

    Comment by Zacharov
    23:46 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But she is young enough to be a selfish brat who decided to take 'revenge' because her mother did not buckle into her tantrum-throwing. And she is still stupid enough to not know the consequences of certain lies!

    Children, especially ill-disciplined ones are conniving selfish bastards who will pull out anything out of their asses to get strangers, or rather, mobs of strangers, to go booing their parents until they buckle in.

    In her case, it is possible she did lie, she pulled the whole 'raped for 6 bucks' thing due to what she hears from her parents or some stranger or some gossipping aunties and thought it would make a good lie. And she did not expect the lie to actually go result in something like this!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:52 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kids are gullible. You tell them they got ass raped and they will tell people they got ass raped. I am convinced those folks are innocent. That kid is a liar.

    Comment by Zacharov
    18:11 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Answering the question about 'how many 6 year olds do you know that can describe the act of sodomy', I say that you will be surprised.

    Children can be very very devious. There's a reason why stories like 'The boy who cried wolf' exist.

    Comment by 13k
    19:55 24/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ok, i'll bite, say that i believe that the girl lied.

    She must have suffered one hell of a mis-treatment (read: abuse) at the hands of her mother (and the friend) to want to send them to prison for life.

    She's old enough to know the consequences of that. And you mean to tell me she's doing this for ATTENTION-SEEKING? Hard to digest.

    OR maybe in a week or so, Arte will post a follow-up story that she WAS really lying, and the mom is set free XD

    Comment by Draco
    00:21 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you honestly telling me that a 7 year old child understands the full consequences of lying about rape.

    Comment by Zacharov
    00:59 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh, I forgot to point out about the 'distorted mind'. Just plain fear of being found out is more than enough for a lying child to keep on the facade. There's a reason why a liar keeps on lying about the same lie for undeterminate periods of time. And that reason is 'fear' of being found out.

    Comment by Zacharov
    00:33 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A 7 year old child probably knows enough that 'rape' is a bad thing just by looking at the response of people when 'rape' is mentioned for one reason or another. She probably thought it was a bad thing, but did not understand just how bad rape really is. She might want to shame her mother, and instead got a trial.

    From the way I see it, there are two possibilities. Either the rape did happen, or it was a lie told by a tantrum-throwing child who doesn't know the full weight of the crime of rape.

    If the rape did happen, it brings the question of why, of all things, $6 for the rape, and if there's cigarrete and whiskey that would cost that much and how many times her mother bought her whiskey and cigarrete during that period of the girl being raped. If the facts did not match up, I am inclined to say the girl is 'crying wolf'.

    Comment by 13k
    00:51 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    and what kind of distorted mind would the child have to have, to continue with the facade until it blows this big?

    read the accompanying article, the source of the story. Among other important points:

    "..pointed out that the girl first told her brothers about the abuse and didn't tell authorities until she had been in foster care for months."

    "The jurors didn't hear the stories of the girl's sisters.

    Two older sisters, now in their 20s, told authorities that their mother had also provided them to Stafford for sex when they were pre-teens and teenagers. In January, Waller ruled the sisters' testimony inadmissible at trial."

    OMG. MOM from hell. I'm more than convinced.

    Comment by Zacharov
    00:55 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Now that there are witnesses' testimonies, I am leaning towards the side of 'Mom is a criminal'. Older sisters of age 20 are more than able to understand the consequences of certain lies.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments