Stripper Rapes Man with Strap-On, Gets Off

strap-on-bdsm-raep.jpg

A stripper who donned a strap-on at a party and then sodomised a man against his will, injuring him in the process, has been declared not guilty, with the court ruling that the anal violation was “accidental.”

The stripper was part of the entertainment at an Australian stag night held in 2007, but the events of that night would only conclude with the verdict delivered at a recent trial.

During her act both he and she ended up unclothed, and she directed him onto all fours, donning a strap-on dildo.

She promised him she would not penetrate him: “Not a problem, relax, it’s only fun, I won’t go there.” She did anyway.

“I was pretty upset at that stage,” says her male victim, “I could feel something was there.”

The stripper allegedly attempted to mollify him: “Don’t worry, only you and I know.”

“She said it was just a joke, just a joke. I knew that there was something wrong down there.” A trip to the toilet did indeed reveal rectal bleeding, though he apparently escaped severe injury.

He demanded she leave, and return his money, but she merely threatened him with security. A scuffle ensued, and he would later press charges against her, alleging the anal violation constituted rape.

Her defence claimed the rape was “accidental”: “This is the case of the accidental rape, if there was one.” The jury apparently believed them, returning a verdict of not guilty after 90 minutes of deliberation.

The stripper wept for joy upon learning she had got wawy with it; her anonymous victim was not present.

Via Heaven.

It is not hard to imagine what the verdict would have been had the roles been reversed…



    Post Comment »
    306 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Pyrolight
    04:25 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What a lovely can-of-worms.

    Rapist: I accidentally raped her
    Prosecution: You gagged her and drug her kicking and screaming into a dark room.
    Rapist: I thought it was the way to the Police station. I get lost easily it was a accident taking her into that room.
    Prosecution: You tied her up.
    Rapist: I didn't mean for the knots to be so tight she couldn't undo them, it was an accident.
    Prosecution: You had sexual intercourse with her 5 times.
    Rapist: Just kept slipping in, what can I say? It was an accident.

    Comment by survivor
    03:32 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i wouldn't have mind to be in his place

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    it looks you dont even know what gay means

    Comment by survivor
    03:59 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    sure...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:56 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    IT MEANS A GUY WANTING TO TAKE IT IN THE ASS. AND NOTHING ELSE

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:47 03/03/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    No it doesn't-fool. Sex between a man and a women...how is that Gay?

    Comment by Lillith
    03:27 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hahahaha, she must have been one butch stripper to hold him down~
    A man being raped by a woman=comedy gold

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:40 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol. Maybe I should rape you XD ^____^

    Comment by survivor
    03:54 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    can i be a volunteer?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:35 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The stripper wept for joy upon learning she had got WAWY with it"

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:46 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i wouldn't have minded to be in his place

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by PunchMyballs
    04:41 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i guess this is how Jack the Ripper came to be, after been constantly raped by hookers, he decided to take no more...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:58 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is the only post so far that made me lol.

    *jack crying in corner* "Why...why why"
    *woman calls jack from the other room* "Oh Jack~"
    *zoom on his face* 0_0-> >_<# z'NO. FUCKING. MORE"

    The legend begins.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:15 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    AUSTRALIA!

    AUSTRALIA!

    AUSTRALIA!

    WE LOVE YOU!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:11 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm gonna go to Australia and rape, rape, rape and when
    the police finally catches me I'll just say I slipped...over and over again, it was an accident, come on, cut me some slack

    Comment by Azure Xuchilbara
    06:19 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder what the verdict would have been if she was

    futa...

    Comment by XSportSeeker
    07:53 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah... while we don't have enough information on this case to judge it, I'm also imagining the results if the roles were reversed.

    Or even if it was a lesbian thing. Only by placing a woman in the victim position would probably be enough to reverse the whole thing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:08 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is so much blanks in this "news" it's not even funny.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Cerenado
    05:40 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "It is not hard to imagine what the verdict would have been had the roles been reversed…"
    My thoughts exactingly!!
    "Accidental Rape", what a revolutionary notion imo.

    Comment by maxchain
    05:04 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You kidding? A guy tried that shit, they'd build a gallows in the courtroom specifically for his trial.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:52 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats pretty fucking funny.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:54 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol yeah, almost as funny as that story about men in the middle east using rape to get women killed. Hilarious lmfao

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:56 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How was that story funny?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:51 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    damnit can we get to the point, source of the OP plz!

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:30 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Australia: Land of Accidental Rape

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:24 23/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And horrible, horrible poisonous animals. Everything wants to kill you here. NO EXCEPTIONS.

    Comment by AnonymousFather
    03:15 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Source of the OP anyone?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:17 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wonder if she plays rapelay?

    Comment by Maid
    03:19 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What happened to the word "raep"? I thought this was a family oriented site with no naughty words?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:09 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This bitch needs to be locked up in Josef Fritzl's basement.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fucking double standards...

    Comment by sanimej2
    08:32 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She "accidentally" slip on a banana peel and it "accidentally" slip in his ass.

    Comment by Atma
    09:33 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As a girl, I says he should not have gotten away with it. Rape is rape.

    Though I have to admit the circumstances sound a little strange. No fighting back? Not even saying no? Sound slike he may have been butthurt (lol sorry pun) that he started bleeding. Girl should have used lube. Always use lube before going in anyone's ass.

    Either way, she should have accepted responsibility for what she did, whether it was full on rape or only the ass-injury.

    Practice safe sex, kids!

    Comment by sanimej2
    10:19 14/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And knowing is half the battle!

    Comment by hALOTOO
    15:27 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If the woman look anything like Demi moore she can strip me all she want...Oh wait maybe not

    Comment by Chainy
    17:01 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Every straight man's worse nightmare :(

    Comment by survivor
    02:16 25/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, what a stupid answer

    Comment by Orio94
    17:37 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Would a virgin technically lose his virginity if he got ass-raped?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:56 15/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    where's equality now when its needed?

    Comment by Exitium
    06:16 16/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Currently harassing the UN and Japan.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:16 06/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck that. Id wish that would've happened to me!!!

    Comment by ColorMeMad
    Comment by Anonymous
    02:09 01/08/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The biasty of Court fails to uphold true judgement of the situation... just becuase it's woman on man rape.

    Comment by SpikeTrigger
    12:31 23/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *GRRRRR* that pisses me off. women can get away with doing SO much in this society it's ridiculous. They can marry you and no matter who leaves , and no matter what reason , they get half YOUR money. Plus they don't really have to fu**ing work. all they have to do is push up on someone and there you go , now they have a place to stay and a spending account >_<" . now aparently they can rape too and get away with it? WTF?! if that was a man instead of a girl , he would have been in prison just as fast as she got acquitted.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:41 16/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know, if you're sick of the way that the legal system takes a soft view of women's offenses against men and a hard view of men's offenses against women, then you should understand that there's something you can do about it. If you don't like how courts will find a way to let women off even when guilty while still finding ways to convict men even when the evidence is quite lacking, then turn it around. What I mean is, if you're ever on a jury, just reverse these tendencies with your vote. If you're on a jury deciding a case where a woman is accused of committing a crime against a man, just assume she's guilty and try to find any way to rationalize convicting her. If you're on a jury deciding a case where a man is accused of committing a crime against a woman, do the opposite and try to find some way to rationalize letting him go. This is actually a very fair strategy when you consider the fact that the accused woman is certain to have gotten the benefit of every doubt by the police and court whereas the man is - like so many before him - certain to have been simply presumed guilty by default. By pursuing this strategy you'll just be leveling the playing field and helping to deliver a more gender blind version of justice. If you want to reverse the bias against men and the bias in favor of women in the justice system, this is one of the best and most direct ways you can do it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:04 16/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "deliver a more gender blind version of justice."
    "If you’re on a jury deciding a case where a woman is accused of committing a crime against a man, just assume she’s guilty and try to find any way to rationalize convicting her. If you’re on a jury deciding a case where a man is accused of committing a crime against a woman, do the opposite and try to find some way to rationalize letting him go."
    THIS IS WHAT MEN'S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE.

    Comment by triplehydra
    06:35 16/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder how a court would react if the stripper were later raped and brought charges against her rapist. "So when you did it it wasn't rape, but now it is, huh?"

    Comment by Metalbunny








    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments