Comments on: Queen’s Blade Second Season Announced

By: Black_Troll

Black_Troll — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:08:03 +0000

Maybe there is a God... *sniffle*...

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:01:24 +0000

no fuck u

By: Gradation

Gradation — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:38:13 +0000

So desperate to stay alive.

By: Lazydabear

Lazydabear — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:20:48 +0000

Considering it only focus on women not on men I guess Feminist would be glad there is not many men.

By: yaku

yaku — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:08:28 +0000

How about we stop going around circles and you guys just say that you wanted to see her panties?

I find it more funny when they trick the viewers like this. You wanted panties. Let's move on.

By: Lazydabear

Lazydabear — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:37:22 +0000

Here something you didn't know about Queenblade that published by Hobby Japan, based on the licensed works from Lost Worlds a Roleplaying game. First published in 2005, it features only female characters that was it said on wikipedia. This series I know is not made to be for children, I would continue to watch it because I want to see happens to Leina.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen's_Blade [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen]

By: sanimej2

sanimej2 — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:13:37 +0000

It's over 9000+!!!!

By: Hyu Zen

Hyu Zen — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:07:45 +0000

+unlimited+!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:04:41 +0000

Excellent news! :D

By: vesper_nova

vesper_nova — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:50:29 +0000

but wouldn't there be a copyright issue?

Well if there isn't I would like to see Dizzy too

By: vesper_nova

vesper_nova — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:25:21 +0000

I think the ricebowl/panties was more of a gag censor like they did in Hayate no Goukou. only that it's less funny and more disappointing

By: vesper_nova

vesper_nova — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:18:30 +0000

not to forget the fact that Queen's blade been arround longer then K-on

By: Desangel

Desangel — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:03:23 +0000

Already a second season? so fast O.o

By: Vegio

Vegio — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:45:20 +0000

Rice bowl =/= pantsu :(

reading the manga, seeing panchira, and then having it compared to a rice bowl is not provocative/erotic not even .. no.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:41:58 +0000

The prospect of more Cattleya is mouthwatering :D

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:16:14 +0000

You're right, the books are quality - I've just ordered the Echidna and Cattleya ones.
Not to play with, just as art books.

By: Narcotic-Nightmares

Narcotic-Nightmares — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:00:19 +0000

I haven't even watched the 1st yet xD

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:09:46 +0000

There are so many more characters left by, and that was to be expected in only one season, I guess this was to be expected.

By: Metalbunny

Metalbunny — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:38:23 +0000

ohhh those feminists would blow a fuse from their heads when they see QUEEN'S BLADES ERO POWERS...

By: Atma

Atma — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0000

This is the best news I've heard all week

By: CC

CC — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:50:27 +0000

Goodie, I'll be looking forward to it.

By: yaku

yaku — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:36:36 +0000

Just because it's not shown doesn't mean it's bad (as in "all censorship is bad"). It's a lot more provocative/erotic to suggest something than to outright show it. It might be a result of regulations, but I find it more tasteful (and damn funny) to show a rice bowl than to have the panties on the screen.

By: VZ

VZ — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:50:29 +0000

People who wonder why Kyoani isn't doing a K-On! S2 just yet need to remember that the company doesn't whore their properties unlike other studios and it shows as their stuff has been high quality and generally successful.

Anyway, bring on more Cattleya!

By: LunarSD

LunarSD — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:04:33 +0000

So true. Yet they could also be obscuring panty shots because the artists themselves originally intended the aesthetic/thematic focus of the show to be non-sexual (as unlikely as that scenario is ^_^). The only way to know for sure is to abolish political correctness censorship/obscenity completely and then see if we still have shows out there that obscure their panty shots if that's what they want to do. Which we would of course. If someone doesn't want sexualizable themes in what they create, they aren't going to put them in there. The censorship crowd's longest-running argument against obscenity is that it would spiral "out of control" if left unregulated. Like a narcotic addict searching for every increasing highs. But what they never realize is that's equating sexual chemistry with narcotics chemistry, which are completely different from each other. Sexuality is naturally regulated in our minds, just as it would be in our creative media. There's nothing artificial and narcotic about sexual experimentation. But that's pretty much all they've got as an argument against us. All hypothetical and more and more untestable the more they keeping banning things, as expected.