School Prints 2500 Lurid Nopan Schoolgirl Photos

schoolgirl-nopan.png

A schoolgirl who refrained from wearing any pantsu for her school yearbook photos, and was subsequently photographed in intimate detail sat immodestly in the front row, has caused consternation after it was revealed that the school printed thousands of copies of her indecent exposure and apparently did not bother recalling them.

The Florida school, Sickles High School, printed and distributed the yearbook normally, but soon after hundreds of students and parents had received it, they received reports of a dreadful mistake.

One female student had opted to attend the photography wearing a short skirt and no underwear, “because she didn’t want her panty lines to show”, but apparently the consequences of this decision eluded her when she sat in the front row of the class (or in this case, pottery club), with her exposure only being noticed by fellow students upon receiving the print:

sickles-high-school-yearbook-crotch-shot-picture-beako.jpg

She maintains resolutely that no exhibitionistic element motivated her act: “Absolutely not. It is ridiculously embarrassing.”

The girl apparently could not muster the courage to return to school in the face of her embarrassment:

“I started crying, I was freaking out and I didn’t know what to do. This is my junior year, it’s so important. I didn’t think I could go back to school knowing that everyone knew and had seen the picture.”

Her understanding mother was unwilling to force her back, so a transfer may be in the offing.

Her mother was not satisfied at the response of the school, and in particular the principal:

“He said he doesn’t want to exploit my daughter and here he is passing out yearbooks with her picture still in it and continuing to pass out pictures! It’s like don’t you get it?”

Curiously, the district school board denies there is anything amiss at all: “We don’t believe there is exposure in the yearbook…. It is a shadow.” It is not clear what they make of the girl’s admission to her fashion conscious pantsu-lessness.

Via WTSP.

Oddly, there is no talk of prosecuting the school or teenager concerned for this brazen publication of child pornography



    Post Comment »
    144 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    04:47 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I've never understood why some girls would rather potentially flash their vadge tahn have panty lines show.

    OH NOES, PANTY LINES. SOMEONE MIGHT NOTICE I AM WEARING UNDERWEAR LIKE A MODERN HUMAN BEING. FOR SHAME.

    Comment by shalala
    03:08 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thank you censorship for once you have done something right. But it is her own flant for not wear any pantys. Man i wish i could wear Pantys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:34 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What not to do when you're afraid that you've unwittingly turned your school yearbook into an upskirt photobook: go to the bloody press with a copy of the picture. I mean, she was mortified about having her school see it, but now people around the world are closely examining her undercarriage.

    Well handled, indeed.

    Comment by AMAYA
    02:30 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    as i commented on this story elsewhere - just a few people seeing her pantyline is a lot less embarassing than the whole school seeing her snatch.

    the school is not to blame for her humiliation, she has no one to blame but herself.

    Comment by Mike
    05:27 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is a lesson here, I can't think of it atm, somewhat distracted... what was I talking about?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:07 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Blue pubic hair? lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:46 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Definitely had it coming. But still, I'd be more worried about those photos of her having a crack smoking party in her house with her mom present.

    Comment by Blitz
    03:24 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't see the whole thing as a big deal; she's not even that good looking. At least imo.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:22 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, well, she can take comfort in the fact that her panty lines did not show

    Comment by MaidNiac
    23:33 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol, they should have done something like what my mid/highschool did. Everyone got a copy of the school yearbook and there's a ad of a resort with women in bikinis at the backcover. A day later, the school ordered everyone to return them back, telling us that they there was a major error. A couple of days later, we got them back and the bikini girls at the back have received some new extra clothings, (lol) drawn with marker pens..

    It's Malaysia,anyway..

    Comment by sleepy
    01:20 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol then what about the people that payed to advertise that particular piece?

    I'm pretty sure they weren't informed of the drastic change in appearance and quality of their ad.

    And imagine manual labour to "cloth" the bikini girls...

    Comment by MaidNiac
    06:19 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol, now that you have mentioned it.. Yea, wonder how.. Maybe they'll just make up excuses like "The bikinis aren't important! People just want to see the resort, not the girls." As for the censorship labour, i believe they were all done by the school Magazine Club members themselves. I dunno if i still have a copy of it.

    My sis cleverly decensored her copy by simply just wiped it out with a cotton of spirit..

    Comment by Waterfall Towers
    00:11 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Reminds me of that seen in Babel, where the schoolgirl comes back from the toilet minus her panties.

    Comment by liveevil
    00:24 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    3d jb idiot. Either she's an idiot or she's an exhibitionist idiot. Why wear a dress like that in the first place if you don't want your "panty lines" to show? She should've just worn some shorts or pants (not pantsu). Or she could've just stood up.

    Comment by A Zabber
    00:38 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lolz to the censorship
    How the hell are we supposed to tell?

    Comment by pervataru
    14:38 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think the school should have pulled all the year books back and had the rush reprint cost passed back to the family for the daughters stupid ass antics, I mean hell they must be saving a lot of money since the girl is not wearing panties, so on need to wash them double the savings lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:00 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I bet she's intenting. It was herself to stay her legs open.

    She wanted to print a significant page on her school yearbook and her life, expecting no one else would found it because maybe the photo would be too small to identify the details, it would be very exciting i know, but she stumbled.

    It was her mother to forced her to say such "embarrassing" words after many people have identified her amazon jungle.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:24 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Suck it up bitch, it's just a highly shaded picture of your pussy. Contrary to popular belief, you are not suddenly the skank and whore queen of your school now. Though you are still a dumbass, just a little more than the most of us are.

    Comment by Yhuingg
    23:00 26/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so where's teh vagina??

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:26 02/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So the pic is posted with a censor over the bits, but still showing her face? You'd think it'd be the other way around, like with all the 'Goddess' slut pics.

    Should be hiding her identity, not her cooch. Now anyone who's never met her but reads this site can embarrass her if they happen to meet her.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:43 23/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lately, he's had no shame in comparing the Obama Administration and the Democratically-controlled Congress to the Third Reich. ,

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:49 20/09/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    high res anyone???

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:33 28/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    need a higher res uncensored version!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:11 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But if it's true it's all her damn, slutty self's fault.

    Comment by Aeromax
    12:44 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder why the school can print almost-real-CP and sell it for cash against the will of the picture's subject - but private citizens can't have non-CP of people who aren't even real with consent of everyone involved

    Comment by Xzone
    08:18 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Check this out:

    http://abgefahrn.blogger.de/static/antville/abgefahrn/images/8628_0001.jpg

    Basically the same thing :)

    Comment by Mike J.
    16:56 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow. This issue has gone a long way. I read about this news last week, and it is everywhere the world wide web. And now, will you look at that, anime school girls. Just cute!

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:21 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    See, this is the kind of things that makes 3D guys think 3D girls are dumbasses in general. Just a little bit of foresight would have easily prevented such a stupid mistake. Hmm, let's see, no panty lines? Or go somewhere where you know your picture will be taken for sure with a short dress and no panties at all, then on top of that not even learning to cross her legs while wearing a dress, with or without panties (I thought that was Basics of a Lady 101?). Potential embarrassment, or potential crises of precious social life? She was asking for it.

    Even a thong would be better. And heck, any hint of panties being seen through a dress just makes the dress extra hot if you ask me. Definitely a lot hotter, and probably less potentially embarrassing, than flashing your distorted cookie around like the next Paris Hilton.

    Potential GGW victim written all over this one, lol.

    The human anon feels much a mix of great pity, anger, and sadness when people do stupid things, especially females. It only shortens the reach towards happiness anons so desire. Please, females, consider the anon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:35 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    to edit my first sentence:

    "See, this is the kind of things that makes 3D guys beleive that hot 3D girls are dumbasses in general."

    Though I feel a lot of the non-hot ones are also quite often dumbasses to a significant extent.

    Comment by Aldwin30
    23:02 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WHY do you need to censor it ??WHYYY lolz

    Comment by Algester
    22:54 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    and logically would'nt the school edit the photos to some extent?....

    Comment by Zomb1e13
    17:09 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Personally I think she should be charged with child pornography since it was her fault for not wearing panties knowing full well they were taking yearbook pictures and that she might sit in the front row.

    Comment by Hangmen
    17:10 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    “I started crying, I was freaking out and I didn’t know what to do. This is my junior year, it’s so important. I didn’t think I could go back to school knowing that everyone knew and had seen the picture.”

    LOL STUPID BITCH HAD IT COMING

    Comment by Dreamer
    22:19 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    because nothing in your life will be as important as your junior year in high school. right...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:58 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    we all know how some stupid people in the 13-18 age range can be. At that age they should truly be focused on learning stuff properly at school rather than worrying about panty lines and the size of their asses/boobs or their social status with other kids.
    Of course some of them actually balance it but too much from one side is what you usually get.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:19 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was actually reading the thing expecting something along the lines of "...and she later attempted suicide, not being able to handle her grief..."

    You know, teenage girls. I'll never understand you schoolgirl and lolicon fans, lol.

    Comment by maru
    17:11 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I expected Japan.. Damn

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Same
    I was expecting some innocent japanese schoolgirl but instead I get some skanky american schoolgirl.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:16 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ah, I see you've noticed that all non-Japanese girls are born with holes the size of their heads... except Japanese girls, of course. Which means all girls who aren't Japanese, do. Of course.

    They do.

    Japanese girls even fear silence, because they fear hearing the sound of a pindrop, because pins are too fearsomely big.

    Comment by GHS
    17:45 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What, it's nice to have a change of news ever so often. Least this time it's on the North American continent and not Europe or Russia again (not that they don't have interesting news either).

    Comment by Denshoni
    18:06 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like these articles cuz I read the title (but not the tags right away) and play a guessing game about which country it's from.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:09 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Either it is a shadow or she has a bigger bush down there than on her head.

    Comment by broken…
    17:02 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original, i don't want to see the original! I DON'T WANT TO SEE THE ORIGINAL!!!!

    Comment by Velox Nex
    17:05 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If she was a junior, wouldn't that most likely mean she was under 18 at the time of the photo, which would technically make that child porn. So shouldn't everyone in possession of one of those year books be arrested for purchasing child porn, and the school be in trouble for distributing child porn. Granted, she doesn't seem to be the brightest bulb in the pack, she may have been held back a few years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:01 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not depicted in a sexual manner nor act.

    So no.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:15 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uh, if you can in fact see her pussy then it is still child porn. I realize that is the argument, but if it is visible then they are in the wrong and it would be child porn.

    But still, try out that argument when they find your collection.

    Comment by Artefact

    You can buy collections of photographs of entirely naked young girls on Amazon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But this is basically voyeurism.

    She was dumb for not wearing underwear but I don't think it makes it okay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:13 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OK, besides the moral rants do we have a consensus of what the hell is it down there?

    Comment by basilio
    19:53 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is the thick underbrush of the tropic jungles. Due to the overhead canopy blocking out the solar radiation, little light is available at such a region. Consequently, moisture level is more easily maintained, allowing detritivores such as fungi and bacteria to grow, in addition to dense patches of moss and fern, which thrive easily in moist, shady regions.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:02 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    she's got thrush?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:18 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ahah, the same thing happened in my high school (except it wasn't on the news)

    Comment by GHS
    17:46 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe they should have mosaiced it just to be safe, hahaha.

    Comment by rockbottom
    17:21 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I bet the kind of action this girl expects the school to do is to recall all of the books, re-print a new set with the picture edited or removed, and have everyone go through the trouble of re-signing all of their books. All at the school's own expense of course.

    She only has herself to blame if no one wants to do anything about it. If she was so afraid of panty lines she could have worn pants/shorts or *gasp* a longer skirt. Lol.

    Comment by the other anon
    02:59 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anyway, it is clear to me that, while the damage cannot be undone, it is the responsibility of the school to take steps in order to prevent a similar scandal from occurring once again.

    From this point on, the photographer whom they will hire must also be tasked with the duty of checking every single female for the presence or absence of underwear prior to taking pictures.

    Comment by Kitsune9Tails
    06:11 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sounds like I just found a new line of work...

    Comment by the other anon
    17:41 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Other possible solutions would have been maebari or plain Band-Aid.

    Comment by Nandaka
    18:01 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    but you must shave 'it' first, not I dont like paipan tough XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:23 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No need waste money for retake/recall/resigning. In Soviet Russian we take old page and paste in new page of school books.

    Comment by ATMalicious
    Comment by Anonymous
    17:00 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    saw this on cnn or some other liberal media network like a week ago. Thought she was hot =3

    Comment by Athrun
    16:20 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    “He said he doesn’t want to exploit my daughter and here he is passing out yearbooks with her picture still in it and continuing to pass out pictures! It’s like don’t you get it?”

    School Principal: I'm sorry ma'm but I predict that this year our school year book will set a record sale. Now if you'll excuse me I have some personal business to attend to.

    fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap

    Comment by dzodzu
    23:38 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "School Principal: I’m sorry ma’m but I predict that this year our school year book will set a record sale. Now if you’ll excuse me I have some personal business to attend to.

    fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap"

    OMG maybe that's exactly the reason haha...
    I think it serves her right for not wearing pancira with such a short skirt ;P
    Btw the first pic greatly suits the situation XD

    Comment by Kitsune9Tails
    06:08 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You mean "pantsu" I think. "Panchira" would be impossible here, because, well... there ain't any to get a glimpse of. ;)

    And Artefact seems to ALWAYS have the right picture for the occasion (he could go into business making greeting cards for you know, birthdays, christmas, funerals, that time you get recorded on the news in your underwear...)

    Oh and +1 on the OP's theory. In America it's always about business! (and fapping apparently)

    Ciao!

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:06 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am expecting this to become a collector's item on ebay. That's a piece of history you can own.

    Comment by jakul
    17:44 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if the girl said she did it on purpose, the school would recall the books immediately and she'd be prosecuted for it, I'm betting. After reading her myspace though, she deserves it lol. She can probably still sue the school over it.

    Comment by basilio
    19:40 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good old America; everybody suing everybody. And she'll probably win, too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:46 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    訴える!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:39 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Power of women in good ol' America, mirite guys?

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:14 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uttaeruwayo!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:28 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well there is only one way to confirm...retake the photos with the exact same circumstances, post the high quality, lossless images online for comparison, and let the vast internet anon community decide whether it was in fact a "shadow" or not. Seems like the proper course of action...right?

    “because she didn’t wasn’t her panty lines to show”
    Why couldn't I have attended this high school where they took ass-shots of the female students? Now that would have warranted the rather hefty price tag on these yearbooks!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:15 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so...wheres the uncensored pic...show!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:58 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well you could've find it on google instead of complaining here....
    http://www.pokerfreerollpassword.com/forum-news/sickles-yearbook-photo

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:04 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hold on a sec:
    http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212231108.shtml

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:14 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Okay, here it is:
    http://www.fishki.net/comment.php?id=51775

    Comment by charlie
    10:38 23/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Bahh all that for nothing, nothing shows.

    Comment by maniac
    17:39 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    my words exactly .... I won't believe in any kind of propaganda without proper proof!!!!
    either we get to see her pussy-meat, OR IT NEVER FUCKING HAPPENED!!!!

    btw I really am a bit disappointed .... it might be just a shadow, but SC is usually of a much more ... revealing nature
    well, she is underage, I guess, so whatever

    Comment by Artefact

    If we just posted the picture, we would be spared all the complaints of those terribly interested to see it...

    Comment by Artefact

    If it is a shadow then I suppose nobody could object to it being posted...

    Comment by liveevil
    00:19 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shadow? Maybe it was a black forest? ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:29 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We wont be able to say if it's a shadow or not if we dont see it right?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:15 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I concurs. Objections?

    Comment by SyaoranLi
    20:41 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    XDDDDD pic censored

    Comment by tho
    16:13 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "It is a shadow."
    nice way to get around of it

    and.. lol @ censorship XD

    Comment by jennajack
    00:19 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/4337/1242493573483.jpg

    Comment by jennajack
    00:22 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    zoomed version

    http://funway.ru/page.php?id_n=6067

    Comment by King of Hentai Gods
    04:59 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the 1st "thx" i guess xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:39 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think he just raged real hard.

    And that's it? Maybe it's just the quality of the scan, but how the hell were most people so sure that was her pussy they were looking at and not just a peak at some apparent panties? It just looks like one of those things that look like they could go either way.

    Comment by Artefact
    Comment by IRAGEDSOHARD
    00:34 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    REALLY classy Artefact; this is like some fucking /b/ shit.

    But it's what I've come to expect by now.
    Gone are the days of true greatness, only cancer remains now.

    Comment by sanimej2
    09:43 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe they meant "5 o'clock shadow"?

    Comment by wtflolrolf
    Comment by Anonymous
    22:03 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    no way, i didnt remember double click the mature filtration.

    Comment by King of Hentai Gods
    04:58 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She's beautiful & sexy, I'd use this to blackmail her to fuck me LOLz!

    Comment by Kevin
    16:13 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I heard about this on my local news yesterday. Brittany Spears has a copycat!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:29 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No she doesn't, because I've never heard of a "Brittany" Spears.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:13 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    reminded me of fmp fumoffu when sagara thrashing the football team and one of the footballers named his ball, Brittany which is supposed to be Britney. well you know how japanese like to englesh the vocab.

    ROFL

    Comment by TQ
    16:30 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lets have a show of hands. Who wants to fap to that? No one? I thought so.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:21 27/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd fap to her even harder if she had her legs crossed. The less you know...

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:15 25/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *too busy fapping to raise hand...yes...both hands...*

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:24 26/05/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    xDDDDDDDDDDDDD good one

    why couldnt she just cross her legs like the girls beside her? dumb girl




    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments