Cop Busted Over Patrol Car Schoolgirl Sex

Cop Busted Over Patrol Car Schoolgirl Sex

A (now former) policeman who committed indecent acts upon no less than two schoolgirls, in one case actually in his very police car and abandoning his post guarding a nuclear power plant to do so, has been dismissed and found guilty of violating the very child protection laws he was sworn to uphold.

The ex-policeman (25), dismissed as soon as the case became known, was found guilty by the court, but has not yet been sentenced. For his part, he admits his crimes.

The prosecution’s closing statement was that of a hound on the heels of a hare: “Your outrageous criminal conduct is beyond belief! It is something subjected to the very greatest social opprobrium. We fear the possible ill effects on both mind and body to two young girls as a result of your actions.” The prosecution sought ten months imprisonment.

The defence’s closing statement was that of a whipped dog: “His actions stemmed from worries about his home and work, and were acts of desperation, not the acts of a man in a normal state of mind. He is still young, and there is still a great chance he can reform”. The defence begged for a stay of execution.

The indictment states that, one August afternoon, he eloped from his post guarding a nuclear power plant, and then joined a 17-year-old schoolgirl in his patrol car, where they engaged in indecent acts.

Then, in September, after work he met a 16-year-old schoolgirl, and they went to her house and engaged themselves in indiscrete acts in the garden.

It is not clear whether these were straightforward underage dalliances, or whether there was an element of coercion, but given that the charges make no mention of force it seems likely they were consensual.

Via ZakZak.

Expect him to become a teacher after he gets out…


    Post Comment »
    34 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Fonzer
    07:28 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    strange 16 and 17 should already be a legal age no matter how old the other one is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:29 08/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    17 and 16?

    Is this even a story? If he was in Hawaii, Nevada, etc., etc., he would have been fine..

    Avatar of metatron
    Comment by metatron
    10:44 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    the cop thinks he is above the law 'coz he upholds the law lol

    Comment by ???
    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    03:42 09/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That guy shouldn't abuse his position of authority like that. He should model after Akasaka and protect lolis from terrorists!

    Avatar of LifeCarrier
    Comment by LifeCarrier
    22:04 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    isn't 14 the age of consent in japan? he must have been charged for leaving his post or for using the police car for sex...

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    No, the effective age of consent is usually 18, when dealing with adults.

    Avatar of Bastille
    Comment by Bastille
    23:46 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    13 is the global age by law in Japan, but many, if not nearly all, of the individual regions have their own laws in place to bump it up higher and I'm pretty sure quite a few have 18 as the minimum.

    Comment by Toby
    06:34 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    So, you can actually *marry* a 16-year-old girl, but then you have to wait 2 years to consummate your marriage. Am I getting that right?
    I'd laugh, but we have similarly screwed up laws here in Germany...

    Comment by Bizzare Adventure
    08:55 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think another compounding factor here was that he was a police officer, which in Japan tends to carry a lot more unspoken social expectations than in other countries.

    Comment by Toby
    06:01 19/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Minimum age of marriage for females is 16 in Japan (as it is in many other places.) Parental consent is required though.
    So, as I understand it, it would be quite legal for, say, a 25-year-old man to marry a 17-year old girl - if everybody concerned is okay with it.
    But it wouldn't be legal for the newlyweds to consummate their marriage? This is screwed up.

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact
    06:38 18/12/2008 # ! Impenetrable

    I don't know about marriage, but juveniles are free to have sex with one another, the consent laws basically target only adults having sex with them...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:21 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    if he didnt rape them then i think he shouldnt be punished for have sex with 16and 17 years old girls.

    Comment by Darkyouck
    21:13 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lol, in France he wouldn't have been arrested, age of consent is 15 there. Personnaly, I don't think a 16 years girl can be considered as a child.

    Comment by Seravy
    21:10 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    16...17...aren't those old enough to know when they want to have sex themselves?
    Whats more of a problem here is not guarding the nuclear plant properly...
    Besides..treating a 16+ person as a "child" is a lot more harmful than them having sex when they want to.

    Comment by 152
    07:40 23/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree. It sounds like "He met with a 16 year old Girl" means that she was waiting for him... and they went to her HOUSE and did stuff in the Garden there... That sounds like the Girls were the ones who led the Officer to it.

    Though the 17 Year old in the Car might not... I think the Nuclear Plant was more important than 2 girls that most likely weren't Virgins as it was...

    Avatar of lerrymaru
    Comment by maru
    20:28 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh well, 16 and 17 years old schoolgirls are much more interesting than a nuclear powerplant...

    Comment by Trezaquets
    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of snakechimera
    Comment by snakechimera
    Comment by Anonymous
    20:34 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just goes to show, people in positions of "respectable" authority are more likely to violate child protection laws, rather than the oft-reviled social outcasts and misfits.

    Comment by math4origami
    07:11 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    How do you define "more likely"? Just one anecdote says nothing of the whole population. And, even if you had a large sample size, statistics still have a margin of error. Unless you want to check on all 6.7 billion people in the world and their sexual inclinations.

    Comment by Herb
    22:35 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Right...so if you are 25 years old, and you like 16~17 years old girls and get 'intimate with them', it makes you a lolicon?

    Then I guess there must be lots of young lolicons out there then...

    Comment by SnooSnoo
    23:38 17/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    So people aren't allowed to have girlfriends before they reach 18 anymore huh? Oh my I was a lolicon 2 years ago. ;_;

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:13 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, people below 18 aren't allowed to have sex with people above 18. If you are both under 18 it's okay.

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    11:23 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Which makes absolutely no sense, but what the hell.

    Comment by JockeII
    03:59 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid law, if you aren't retarded you know very well to choose for yourself after you are 15.

    On the other hand, 10 months is nothing compared to what you would get in Sweden. Stupid fucks made it so sex with a minor is automatically considered RAEP = many years.
    So, a 15 year girl having sex with a 14 year old boy in Sweden = at least around 3 years of prison for the girl.

    Comment by MaimeDaifuku
    06:12 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    wait... the girl and not the guy? So the guy gets off free for cryiny rape?

    Avatar of shockerz
    Comment by Tommy
    10:07 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    What a lucky guy

    Comment by JockeII
    09:06 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    And also like I said, in Sweden ALL sex involving minor is rape. So, the 15 year girl gets judged for rape even though she and the 14-year old boy both consented.

    Comment by JockeII
    09:03 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    In my example it is the girl "raping" the guy, since he is underage (14) and she is over the age of consent (15).

    Great law huh? >_>

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    11:27 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm sure UNICEF is happy.

    Comment by SFby
    00:23 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just 10 months imprisonment. I think its not fair enough for a crime that could lead to sucide of two young girls. Well good to know that if i commit a crime like this I will be free in just 10 months. That is 5 months for raping 1 girl GREAT.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 18/12/2008 # ! Neutral (0)

    It wasn't reap. Coercion maybe but definitely not reap. Didn't you read the article?




    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments