OWNED

you really sound either like a child or someone who has NO idea what's happening in the world, or even both.

trolls like you are just stupid. I'm a lolicon, I say this, in public and over the internet and yet: I haven't touched a single child in an inappropriate way and I won't. I don't fap to them as well.

you're just one of those moralic fags that try to sound mature, but yet you don't know what lolicons think. Same goes for UNICEF.

I don't even get why I'm raging about your trolling or why I'm trying to take you serious, but it's just so wrong to think that lolicons are bad.

thank you for being a troll, the world would appreciate it if you stopped for eternity.

To whom it may concern,

Recently, it has come to my attention that viewing cartoons representing crimes was a crime in and of itself. With that regard in mind, I wish to admit accomplice to murder because I watched an episode of the cartoon "The Simpsons" in which a character, one Milhouse, was killed by the school board faculty member during a "Halloween special". I wish to report this crime to you, and have copied a form sent to the police station, in accordance with the new local law set by (case and or constitutional amendment). I have heard in the United States a man has received 20 years in prison for not reporting a comparatively minor crime as pornography when depicted in a cartoon, and so for crimes of a more serious nature, such as murder, I will aim to keep you, and the police force, informed to make sure the sick bastards who watch this get their due. I expect a due diligance investigation to take place, my tax dollars are to be well spent protecting the integrity of fictional cartoon characters everywhere and to crucify the bastards who would dare try to kill them. After all, cartoon violence is just as linked to first degree murder as cartoon porn is to rape, so I hope to see everyone who aided in this crime put in the slammer.

PS: I know for a fact my neighbor is an accomplice to this murder, and there is likely to be vigilante justice for this sort of complacency, he was laughing as the murder took place. Laughing! I am willing to testify against him, check the records on his system, you will see the offending episode.

I will not rest until fictional violence, be it cartoon or movie, is completely removed! Or, of course, (court case/constitutional law) is overturned, since if it is allowed to be cruel to cartoon characters, there is no fault.

I leave this message Anonymous, in the spirit of the concerned average citizen.

~Anon

The truth is that there is as much grandma porn as there is loli porn on the internet, and by the femnazis logic, the grandma porn should have offsetted the loli porn, which it didn't.

Therefore banning Loli will NOT have any effect on what a man's inborn desires are. Femnazis FTL.

Japanese censorship rules, adult material is allowed under the condition it is properly censored and no genital areas are displayed uncensored, language is mild but uncencored in any case. This includes martial viewable by adults and children.

Further more, "loli" or "Lolicon" is not actually i type of adult material, but material in which a younger person under 16 is viewed as sexually attractive usually by obsessive innocence being the primary attraction. Semi adult "loli" scenes are newer but often follow similar restrictions.

The thing about Japans opponents in these debates, they heavily censor all material, but also have far higher crime rates.

My personal Verdict, Maybe The world needs to worry less about Japans ways, and try to understand why the looser nature of Japans ways are breeding generation less likely statistically to commit such crimes.

My theory, Younger more innocent people becoming aware of such things before they fully understand them, may help them to understand on a subconscious level, that they are wrong. This would effectively increase the morality of people, and leave less question on the morality of entertainment content.

This may in fact me very wrong, but is only a theory from an outsider. Regardless Stats have always placed Japan as one of the lowest crime rate countries in the world, and as having one of the highest average intelligence levels in the world.

My Suggestion, and I am happy to be quizzed on why,(lorddeville@yahoo.co.uk) Maybe countries should think less about making Japan like them, and more about being like Japan, as it is meeting the aims they continuously fail at.

While your at it, consider how their political campaigns were carried out! You'd think such an educated society would put more in their politician's policies than emotional appeals. It was like half of Obama's campaign, the half the touted "change" over and over again.

one thing i would have to mention is the fact that the first graph and the second set of statistics contradict each other, which means that somebody is lying.

"In fact, I like to avoid real children, regardless of gender or whatnot, because they tend to, in most cases, annoy the living hell out of me."

I love lolicon, but that doesn't make it a totally innocent thing. It depicts children being raped, for god's sake. Cartoons, yes, but kid cartoons, with kid bodies.

wudntuwannaknow's valid point that linking declining rape rates with lolicon distribution is incredibly simplistic, and unless you're ignorant or profoundly self-deluded, you'd agree with him. Even if lolicon played some minor role in such a trend, using this as ammunition in an argument is just being flippant to the issues.

I would hate to see lolicon banned (and may have my reservations about banning any content that doesn't harm anyone in the making), but would I disagree with the proponents of said ban, or fail to understand their repulsion of lolicon? Not in the least.

Why fight so hard to give animated characters(that never existed in the first place)human rights when the humans that actually exist are told to go fuck themselves if they ask for help?

Detailed data and reasoning:
The statistics used in the compilation is of poor quality, and somewhat misleading, for the following reasons:
1) It does not represent what people seem to be thinking. Going through the pdf from the UNODC (which is where the data is hosted...the UNSD link seems to be a mistake), it seems that the numbers in the table is the # of rapes reported, not the numbers convicted and is therefore extremely prone to variations in reporting rates (to put things in context, I especially recommend that you take a look at the grand total of reported crimes (rates) for all crimes: there are some obvious outliers that would be difficult to explain away...and also shifts of almost three orders of magnitude in the three years from 1998 to 2000 in a politically stable country). i.e. any data in the compilation needs to be taken with a grain of salt and an understanding of the context.
2) The rate of convictions for rape/10000 shows very different values for some countries (I'm looking at Canada: only about 10% of the reported cases end in convictions, compared to Japan's ~33% conviction rate for the same crime).
3) The number of cases reported and the number of rape convictions both depend on the social stigma associated with rape victims, if any exists. For that, I would like to shift your attention to a different survey aimed at assessing crime rates, also administered by an UN agency: in this case the UNCRI. According to the data from the ICVS survey, which seeks to gather information on victims, the disparity between Japan and other countries in question is greatly reduced (0.8% for Japan and Canada, 1.4 for USA, 1.3 for Norway, 0.3 for France, etc.).
4) In the ICVS survey mentioned in 3, the researchers noted that it is likely that the greater the equality for women in a country, the more likely they are to report incidents to the surveyors. Furthermore, that particular section is somewhat more unstable over the years than other crimes surveyed. I would like to further add to the latter point that Japan's 8-fold jump from 0.1% in 1999 to 0.8% in 2003-2004 is by far the largest jump in magnitude with one exception: Ireland's rate jumped from 0.1% to 1.2% in the same period.
5) More about the ICVS survey: if social stigma on the issue exists in Japan, as the large difference between the # reported to police, the # convicted, and the # reported to the surveyors seem to indicate, the methodology of ICVS is likely to promote under-reporting in Japan with respect to other industrialized countries. To be specific, Japan is unique among the developed countries surveyed in that the subjects are interviewed face to face, as opposed to through the telephone.

the reason why this stuff happens is because no one has a voice any more we have no organization.
And if we did the so called MORAL THAN THOU will make a bigger mess than what they do already.