Comments on: Mother Haet Raep: When Lolis Attack…

By: Yuri

Yuri — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:18:11 +0000

Ja, dar sta je dan in je blote kleine kontje

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:59:53 +0000

It wasn't much of an ass to need exposing of anyways. I thought the days of flat ass were over for the Japanese :(

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:33:45 +0000

That girl would grow up to be a legend at sharking...

By: ayu-kun

ayu-kun — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:49:04 +0000

I don't think it's a blur caused by focus, given my enough exposure to photography (we have a studio and we casually go on photo 'ventures.') The blur could be caused by the lens. Maybe he wiped some water on the lens or whatever, but I'm sure it aint natural focus or motion blur. I think it's shopped though, given the unusual curve (and violet parts) on the exposed butt cheek.

By: Bento

Bento — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:03:01 +0000

I would say that this picture is real. Kids do these type of actions. And if you're lucky to have a camera, you might catch it. lol

THOUGH... her ass crack does seem weird.

By: sof

sof — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:32:54 +0000

even if it's shopped I lol'd^^

By: T_H

T_H — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:34:26 +0000

Absolutely, positively shopped. By someone who couldn't draw a butt on a cigarette.

By: lordchair

lordchair — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:16:47 +0000

Absolutely shopped. The top of her ass crack is a complete mess. If you don't think so, look at where her left arm joins the shoulder, at her armpit-crack. The shadows and coloration of her ass crack should be very similar to that armpit area, but they are most definitely not.

Also, the girl's thumb on the pulled-down bikini bottom is a big clue, since it seems as if the notch between her thumb and first finger is deeper than it ought to be, and the hard line and strangle angularity of the edge of the mother's right buttock is another giveaway.

By: user

user — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:38:54 +0000

Definitely looks shopped. The person did an unconvincing job. If you look closely you can see the bikini and child's hand extending down to elbow has been altered. The child's hand especially looks awkward anatomically and that it has been painted in. They drew an outline around the child's hand and lower arm. But as the rest of the photo shows, there would be no hard shadow outlining the arm in that manner especially considering where the body parts are casting their shadows.

By: Artefact

Artefact — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:53:55 +0000

I put that in because it might be shopped, I'm afraid I have no evidence either way.

By: anon

anon — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:45:19 +0000

"photoshop" is even in the tags... i take that as shopped

By: mark

mark — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:53:29 +0000

Her tan lines seem right enough for me. It could be that she wears shorts more often.

By: Rimamashiro

Rimamashiro — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:34:57 +0000

No problem, I'm not really sure about it yet though. Doing a photographic education at the moment started it 2 weeks ago so I have still a lot to learn XD

By: Mk200114

Mk200114 — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:02:52 +0000

I wasn't sure at first. It looks real enough. But now I notice how jagged the right side of her ass is.

By: Shinryu

Shinryu — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:15:21 +0000

Oh, didn´t know about that, I don´t know near nothing about cams, thanks for the correction :D.

By: Rimamashiro

Rimamashiro — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:36:16 +0000

That could be a setting on the camera though, I have a Nikon D80 here who has a option for that. You can set where you want it to be focused. But if I look closer you only see the blur on her ass and the child. If the camera was set to what i mention above, It would have only be blurry on the downside of the photo if i'm right. So my guess goes to shopped or a photographer who didn't configure the camera correctly.

By: Shinryu

Shinryu — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:59:02 +0000

There is a blur on the kids AND her butt, on the top of her ass... can´t really be sure... but, I go for no.